Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation

B. Poonkuzhali, J. Victoria, R. Selvakumar, D. Dennison, A. Srivastava, L. Jeyaseelan, M. Chandy, A. S. Kanagasabapathy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cyclosporine (CsA) analysis in blood from patients who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for various haematological disorders was done both by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and the results were compared. HPLC kit from Biorad Laboratories, USA, and EMIT kit from SYVA, UK, were used. The procedure for EMIT was slightly modified in-house to suit the Hitachi 704 discrete selective analyser. The CsA values obtained by these two methods correlated well within the therapeutic range (r value 0.96), HPLC method being most suitable outside the therapeutic range. Although HPLC is the ideal method for CsA, EMIT is quite suitable and can be adopted by any laboratory with an autoanalyser incorporating our modified procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-41
Number of pages3
JournalIndian Journal of Medical Research
Volume102
Issue numberJULY
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique
High performance liquid chromatography
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Cyclosporine
Assays
Bone
Blood
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography
Enzymes
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cyclosporine A
  • Enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique
  • High performance liquid chromatography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Poonkuzhali, B., Victoria, J., Selvakumar, R., Dennison, D., Srivastava, A., Jeyaseelan, L., ... Kanagasabapathy, A. S. (1995). Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 102(JULY), 39-41.

Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation. / Poonkuzhali, B.; Victoria, J.; Selvakumar, R.; Dennison, D.; Srivastava, A.; Jeyaseelan, L.; Chandy, M.; Kanagasabapathy, A. S.

In: Indian Journal of Medical Research, Vol. 102, No. JULY, 1995, p. 39-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poonkuzhali, B, Victoria, J, Selvakumar, R, Dennison, D, Srivastava, A, Jeyaseelan, L, Chandy, M & Kanagasabapathy, AS 1995, 'Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation', Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 102, no. JULY, pp. 39-41.
Poonkuzhali B, Victoria J, Selvakumar R, Dennison D, Srivastava A, Jeyaseelan L et al. Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 1995;102(JULY):39-41.
Poonkuzhali, B. ; Victoria, J. ; Selvakumar, R. ; Dennison, D. ; Srivastava, A. ; Jeyaseelan, L. ; Chandy, M. ; Kanagasabapathy, A. S. / Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation. In: Indian Journal of Medical Research. 1995 ; Vol. 102, No. JULY. pp. 39-41.
@article{129b33bbdf93452f84a91835c57dcb7e,
title = "Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation",
abstract = "Cyclosporine (CsA) analysis in blood from patients who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for various haematological disorders was done both by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and the results were compared. HPLC kit from Biorad Laboratories, USA, and EMIT kit from SYVA, UK, were used. The procedure for EMIT was slightly modified in-house to suit the Hitachi 704 discrete selective analyser. The CsA values obtained by these two methods correlated well within the therapeutic range (r value 0.96), HPLC method being most suitable outside the therapeutic range. Although HPLC is the ideal method for CsA, EMIT is quite suitable and can be adopted by any laboratory with an autoanalyser incorporating our modified procedure.",
keywords = "Cyclosporine A, Enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique, High performance liquid chromatography",
author = "B. Poonkuzhali and J. Victoria and R. Selvakumar and D. Dennison and A. Srivastava and L. Jeyaseelan and M. Chandy and Kanagasabapathy, {A. S.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "39--41",
journal = "Indian Journal of Medical Research",
issn = "0971-5916",
publisher = "Indian Council of Medical Research",
number = "JULY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of HPLC and EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation

AU - Poonkuzhali, B.

AU - Victoria, J.

AU - Selvakumar, R.

AU - Dennison, D.

AU - Srivastava, A.

AU - Jeyaseelan, L.

AU - Chandy, M.

AU - Kanagasabapathy, A. S.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Cyclosporine (CsA) analysis in blood from patients who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for various haematological disorders was done both by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and the results were compared. HPLC kit from Biorad Laboratories, USA, and EMIT kit from SYVA, UK, were used. The procedure for EMIT was slightly modified in-house to suit the Hitachi 704 discrete selective analyser. The CsA values obtained by these two methods correlated well within the therapeutic range (r value 0.96), HPLC method being most suitable outside the therapeutic range. Although HPLC is the ideal method for CsA, EMIT is quite suitable and can be adopted by any laboratory with an autoanalyser incorporating our modified procedure.

AB - Cyclosporine (CsA) analysis in blood from patients who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for various haematological disorders was done both by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and the results were compared. HPLC kit from Biorad Laboratories, USA, and EMIT kit from SYVA, UK, were used. The procedure for EMIT was slightly modified in-house to suit the Hitachi 704 discrete selective analyser. The CsA values obtained by these two methods correlated well within the therapeutic range (r value 0.96), HPLC method being most suitable outside the therapeutic range. Although HPLC is the ideal method for CsA, EMIT is quite suitable and can be adopted by any laboratory with an autoanalyser incorporating our modified procedure.

KW - Cyclosporine A

KW - Enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique

KW - High performance liquid chromatography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029088819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029088819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 39

EP - 41

JO - Indian Journal of Medical Research

JF - Indian Journal of Medical Research

SN - 0971-5916

IS - JULY

ER -