Transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation

A facies change coinciding with extensional, syndepositional faulting (Ediacaran, Jabal Akhdar Dome, Central Oman Mountains)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the core of the Jabal Akhdar Dome, an irregular horst composed of carbonates of the Hajir Formation is bounded by syndepositional extensional faults on either side. The western, SSW-dipping fault is an extensional growth fault associated with rollover anticline and syncline within syndepositional siliciclastic strata of the Muaydin Formation. Syndepositional extension is indicated by increasing thickness of the involved strata of the Muaydin Formation towards the fault. The eastern, ESE-dipping fault, exhibits a larger displacement than the western fault. Both the western and the eastern fault are blanketed by postdeformational Muaydin deposits. Taking into account that the strike of both faults differs significantly (see above), we suggest that the eastern fault represents the main fault of a relay ramp system whereas the western one is the fault of a breached relay ramp with a dip angle of 65°. Compaction is able to explain some particular stratal patterns of the Muaydin Formation. The eastern fault may provide insights as to possible similar Ediacaran movements along the NNE-striking Proto-Semail Gap (i.e. the Proterozoic Semail Gap). Ediacaran vertical block movements at the latter may explain why the Muaydin Formation is present in the Jabal Akhdar Dome in the west but absent in the easterly located Saih Hatat Dome. The tectonic setting is characterized by WNW-ESE-oriented extension. Immediately west of the irregular horst we found a seemingly complete stratigraphic transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation. On top of this structure is a minor stratigraphic hiatus at the contact between both formations. Although the observed features are all outcrop-scale phenomena, we suggest that they provide insights into the general Ediacaran tectonic and depositional setting. This setting is characterized by complete and incomplete stratigraphies and by syndepositional extension which may be held responsible for the abrupt change from carbonate to siliciclastic facies as well as common slumps in the lower part of the Muaydin Formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-244
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of African Earth Sciences
Volume152
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ediacaran
dome
faulting
mountain
horst
carbonate
growth fault
hiatus
syncline
anticline
tectonic setting
dip
compaction
Proterozoic
outcrop

Keywords

  • Compaction
  • Extensional faults
  • Growth fault
  • Relay ramp
  • Rollover anticline
  • Semail Gap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

@article{550cb3b4ff4b4163a8e5806c93e36e3d,
title = "Transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation: A facies change coinciding with extensional, syndepositional faulting (Ediacaran, Jabal Akhdar Dome, Central Oman Mountains)",
abstract = "In the core of the Jabal Akhdar Dome, an irregular horst composed of carbonates of the Hajir Formation is bounded by syndepositional extensional faults on either side. The western, SSW-dipping fault is an extensional growth fault associated with rollover anticline and syncline within syndepositional siliciclastic strata of the Muaydin Formation. Syndepositional extension is indicated by increasing thickness of the involved strata of the Muaydin Formation towards the fault. The eastern, ESE-dipping fault, exhibits a larger displacement than the western fault. Both the western and the eastern fault are blanketed by postdeformational Muaydin deposits. Taking into account that the strike of both faults differs significantly (see above), we suggest that the eastern fault represents the main fault of a relay ramp system whereas the western one is the fault of a breached relay ramp with a dip angle of 65°. Compaction is able to explain some particular stratal patterns of the Muaydin Formation. The eastern fault may provide insights as to possible similar Ediacaran movements along the NNE-striking Proto-Semail Gap (i.e. the Proterozoic Semail Gap). Ediacaran vertical block movements at the latter may explain why the Muaydin Formation is present in the Jabal Akhdar Dome in the west but absent in the easterly located Saih Hatat Dome. The tectonic setting is characterized by WNW-ESE-oriented extension. Immediately west of the irregular horst we found a seemingly complete stratigraphic transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation. On top of this structure is a minor stratigraphic hiatus at the contact between both formations. Although the observed features are all outcrop-scale phenomena, we suggest that they provide insights into the general Ediacaran tectonic and depositional setting. This setting is characterized by complete and incomplete stratigraphies and by syndepositional extension which may be held responsible for the abrupt change from carbonate to siliciclastic facies as well as common slumps in the lower part of the Muaydin Formation.",
keywords = "Compaction, Extensional faults, Growth fault, Relay ramp, Rollover anticline, Semail Gap",
author = "Frank Mattern and Andreas Scharf",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.02.016",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "237--244",
journal = "Journal of African Earth Sciences",
issn = "0899-5362",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation

T2 - A facies change coinciding with extensional, syndepositional faulting (Ediacaran, Jabal Akhdar Dome, Central Oman Mountains)

AU - Mattern, Frank

AU - Scharf, Andreas

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - In the core of the Jabal Akhdar Dome, an irregular horst composed of carbonates of the Hajir Formation is bounded by syndepositional extensional faults on either side. The western, SSW-dipping fault is an extensional growth fault associated with rollover anticline and syncline within syndepositional siliciclastic strata of the Muaydin Formation. Syndepositional extension is indicated by increasing thickness of the involved strata of the Muaydin Formation towards the fault. The eastern, ESE-dipping fault, exhibits a larger displacement than the western fault. Both the western and the eastern fault are blanketed by postdeformational Muaydin deposits. Taking into account that the strike of both faults differs significantly (see above), we suggest that the eastern fault represents the main fault of a relay ramp system whereas the western one is the fault of a breached relay ramp with a dip angle of 65°. Compaction is able to explain some particular stratal patterns of the Muaydin Formation. The eastern fault may provide insights as to possible similar Ediacaran movements along the NNE-striking Proto-Semail Gap (i.e. the Proterozoic Semail Gap). Ediacaran vertical block movements at the latter may explain why the Muaydin Formation is present in the Jabal Akhdar Dome in the west but absent in the easterly located Saih Hatat Dome. The tectonic setting is characterized by WNW-ESE-oriented extension. Immediately west of the irregular horst we found a seemingly complete stratigraphic transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation. On top of this structure is a minor stratigraphic hiatus at the contact between both formations. Although the observed features are all outcrop-scale phenomena, we suggest that they provide insights into the general Ediacaran tectonic and depositional setting. This setting is characterized by complete and incomplete stratigraphies and by syndepositional extension which may be held responsible for the abrupt change from carbonate to siliciclastic facies as well as common slumps in the lower part of the Muaydin Formation.

AB - In the core of the Jabal Akhdar Dome, an irregular horst composed of carbonates of the Hajir Formation is bounded by syndepositional extensional faults on either side. The western, SSW-dipping fault is an extensional growth fault associated with rollover anticline and syncline within syndepositional siliciclastic strata of the Muaydin Formation. Syndepositional extension is indicated by increasing thickness of the involved strata of the Muaydin Formation towards the fault. The eastern, ESE-dipping fault, exhibits a larger displacement than the western fault. Both the western and the eastern fault are blanketed by postdeformational Muaydin deposits. Taking into account that the strike of both faults differs significantly (see above), we suggest that the eastern fault represents the main fault of a relay ramp system whereas the western one is the fault of a breached relay ramp with a dip angle of 65°. Compaction is able to explain some particular stratal patterns of the Muaydin Formation. The eastern fault may provide insights as to possible similar Ediacaran movements along the NNE-striking Proto-Semail Gap (i.e. the Proterozoic Semail Gap). Ediacaran vertical block movements at the latter may explain why the Muaydin Formation is present in the Jabal Akhdar Dome in the west but absent in the easterly located Saih Hatat Dome. The tectonic setting is characterized by WNW-ESE-oriented extension. Immediately west of the irregular horst we found a seemingly complete stratigraphic transition from the Hajir Formation to the Muaydin Formation. On top of this structure is a minor stratigraphic hiatus at the contact between both formations. Although the observed features are all outcrop-scale phenomena, we suggest that they provide insights into the general Ediacaran tectonic and depositional setting. This setting is characterized by complete and incomplete stratigraphies and by syndepositional extension which may be held responsible for the abrupt change from carbonate to siliciclastic facies as well as common slumps in the lower part of the Muaydin Formation.

KW - Compaction

KW - Extensional faults

KW - Growth fault

KW - Relay ramp

KW - Rollover anticline

KW - Semail Gap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062236052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062236052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.02.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.02.016

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 237

EP - 244

JO - Journal of African Earth Sciences

JF - Journal of African Earth Sciences

SN - 0899-5362

ER -