The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings

Derek Thomson, Ammar Kaka, Laura Pronk, Chaham Alalouch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The process of elicitation and synthesis of the collective understanding of a cultural domain held by a group of stakeholders is challenging. This problem typifies the pre-project activity from which a coherent understanding of the benefits sought from infrastructure investment must emerge to inform the business case rationale. The anthropological freelisting method is evaluated as a solution by determining its ability to be operationalized in a practical form for project application. Using data from the stakeholders of a large NHS Scotland building project, the use of multidimensional scaling for data analysis is compared with participatory pilesorting to determine which freelisting protocol balances insight with practicality. Neither approach is found to offer an ideal method of characterizing sought benefits. The social construction of pilesorting promotes reliability while the analytical rigour of multidimensional scaling remains attractive to auditors. Their distinct insights suggest that both approaches should be combined in future and used alongside further post-elicitation devices from anthropology such as cultural consensus modelling or structured conceptualization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-323
Number of pages15
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Industry
Multidimensional scaling
Stakeholders
Healthcare
Infrastructure investment
Social construction
Auditors
Anthropology
Modeling
Scotland
Business case
Rationale
Conceptualization

Keywords

  • benefits realization
  • Freelisting
  • healthcare
  • stakeholder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Management Information Systems
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings. / Thomson, Derek; Kaka, Ammar; Pronk, Laura; Alalouch, Chaham.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 309-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4625140b6db4ccbbd50cbb278e13cef,
title = "The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings",
abstract = "The process of elicitation and synthesis of the collective understanding of a cultural domain held by a group of stakeholders is challenging. This problem typifies the pre-project activity from which a coherent understanding of the benefits sought from infrastructure investment must emerge to inform the business case rationale. The anthropological freelisting method is evaluated as a solution by determining its ability to be operationalized in a practical form for project application. Using data from the stakeholders of a large NHS Scotland building project, the use of multidimensional scaling for data analysis is compared with participatory pilesorting to determine which freelisting protocol balances insight with practicality. Neither approach is found to offer an ideal method of characterizing sought benefits. The social construction of pilesorting promotes reliability while the analytical rigour of multidimensional scaling remains attractive to auditors. Their distinct insights suggest that both approaches should be combined in future and used alongside further post-elicitation devices from anthropology such as cultural consensus modelling or structured conceptualization.",
keywords = "benefits realization, Freelisting, healthcare, stakeholder",
author = "Derek Thomson and Ammar Kaka and Laura Pronk and Chaham Alalouch",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/01446193.2012.658824",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "309--323",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings

AU - Thomson, Derek

AU - Kaka, Ammar

AU - Pronk, Laura

AU - Alalouch, Chaham

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - The process of elicitation and synthesis of the collective understanding of a cultural domain held by a group of stakeholders is challenging. This problem typifies the pre-project activity from which a coherent understanding of the benefits sought from infrastructure investment must emerge to inform the business case rationale. The anthropological freelisting method is evaluated as a solution by determining its ability to be operationalized in a practical form for project application. Using data from the stakeholders of a large NHS Scotland building project, the use of multidimensional scaling for data analysis is compared with participatory pilesorting to determine which freelisting protocol balances insight with practicality. Neither approach is found to offer an ideal method of characterizing sought benefits. The social construction of pilesorting promotes reliability while the analytical rigour of multidimensional scaling remains attractive to auditors. Their distinct insights suggest that both approaches should be combined in future and used alongside further post-elicitation devices from anthropology such as cultural consensus modelling or structured conceptualization.

AB - The process of elicitation and synthesis of the collective understanding of a cultural domain held by a group of stakeholders is challenging. This problem typifies the pre-project activity from which a coherent understanding of the benefits sought from infrastructure investment must emerge to inform the business case rationale. The anthropological freelisting method is evaluated as a solution by determining its ability to be operationalized in a practical form for project application. Using data from the stakeholders of a large NHS Scotland building project, the use of multidimensional scaling for data analysis is compared with participatory pilesorting to determine which freelisting protocol balances insight with practicality. Neither approach is found to offer an ideal method of characterizing sought benefits. The social construction of pilesorting promotes reliability while the analytical rigour of multidimensional scaling remains attractive to auditors. Their distinct insights suggest that both approaches should be combined in future and used alongside further post-elicitation devices from anthropology such as cultural consensus modelling or structured conceptualization.

KW - benefits realization

KW - Freelisting

KW - healthcare

KW - stakeholder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859823617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859823617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2012.658824

DO - 10.1080/01446193.2012.658824

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 309

EP - 323

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 4

ER -