TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of isothermal flow assumption on accuracy of pressure transient analysis results
AU - Dastkhan, Yaghoub
AU - Kazemi, Alireza
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Kappa Engineering for providing Saphir (well test analysis software) and Rubis (numerical reservoir simulation software) used in this study. Thanks also go to Zohrab Dastkhan of Zodan Solutions for useful discussions on the use of software packages.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Adiabatic expansion and viscous dissipation of fluid flow in porous media result in considerable heating or cooling of hydrocarbon fluids when pressure gradients are very large. Traditionally, fluid flow in porous media has been assumed isothermal in hydrocarbon reservoirs. While this assumption helps with simplifying the physics of fluid flow by neglecting the thermal effects, it imposes a dominant impact on fluid properties in situations where flow undergoes fast paced and abrupt changes in flow rate and or pressure. The analytical solutions of fluid flow for pressure transient analysis rely on the isothermal flow assumption. Since the variations of fluid properties are not accounted for in temperature fluctuations, there is an inherent error in standard methods of well test analysis. In this paper, the errors in pressure transient analysis as a consequence of the assumption of isothermal fluid flow are investigated. The magnitude of error is quantified as a function of flow rate and pressure drop. Error analysis shows that at higher flow rates, the thermal impacts are elevated such that the application of isothermal flow models becomes erroneous and invalid. It can be shown that oil well tests are more influenced by thermal effects compared to gas well tests in conventional dry gas reservoirs. This study highlights an important thermal impact that is often neglected and should be considered in the design, execution, and analysis stages of well testing. Also, it suggests that isothermal analytical models should be avoided for well test analysis with large flow rates.
AB - Adiabatic expansion and viscous dissipation of fluid flow in porous media result in considerable heating or cooling of hydrocarbon fluids when pressure gradients are very large. Traditionally, fluid flow in porous media has been assumed isothermal in hydrocarbon reservoirs. While this assumption helps with simplifying the physics of fluid flow by neglecting the thermal effects, it imposes a dominant impact on fluid properties in situations where flow undergoes fast paced and abrupt changes in flow rate and or pressure. The analytical solutions of fluid flow for pressure transient analysis rely on the isothermal flow assumption. Since the variations of fluid properties are not accounted for in temperature fluctuations, there is an inherent error in standard methods of well test analysis. In this paper, the errors in pressure transient analysis as a consequence of the assumption of isothermal fluid flow are investigated. The magnitude of error is quantified as a function of flow rate and pressure drop. Error analysis shows that at higher flow rates, the thermal impacts are elevated such that the application of isothermal flow models becomes erroneous and invalid. It can be shown that oil well tests are more influenced by thermal effects compared to gas well tests in conventional dry gas reservoirs. This study highlights an important thermal impact that is often neglected and should be considered in the design, execution, and analysis stages of well testing. Also, it suggests that isothermal analytical models should be avoided for well test analysis with large flow rates.
KW - interpretation error
KW - Joule-Thomson effect
KW - pressure transient analysis
KW - thermal flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109193252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109193252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cjce.24208
DO - 10.1002/cjce.24208
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109193252
SN - 0008-4034
VL - 100
SP - 1050
EP - 1060
JO - Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
JF - Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
IS - 5
ER -