Systematic methods for measuring outcomes: How they may be used to improve outcomes after radical cystectomy

Khurram M. Siddiqui, Jonathan I. Izawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract In the era of managed healthcare, the measuring and reporting of surgical outcomes is a universal mandate. The outcomes should be monitored and reported in a timely manner. Methods for measuring surgical outcomes should be continuous, free of bias and accommodate variations in patient factors. The traditional methods of surgical audits are periodic, resource-intensive and have a potential for bias. These audits are typically annual and therefore there is a long time lag before any effective remedial action could be taken. To reduce this delay the manufacturing industry has long used statistical control-chart monitoring systems, as they offer continuous monitoring and are better suited to monitoring outcomes systematically and promptly. The healthcare industry is now embracing such systematic methods. Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex surgical procedures. Systematic methods for measuring outcomes after RC can identify areas of improvements on an ongoing basis, which can be used to initiate timely corrective measures. We review the available methods to improve the outcomes. Cumulative summation charts have the potential to be a robust method which can prompt early warnings and thus initiate an analysis of root causes. This early-warning system might help to resolve the issue promptly with no need to wait for the report of annual audits. This system can also be helpful for monitoring learning curves for individuals, both in training or when learning a new technology.

Original languageEnglish
Article number294
Pages (from-to)122-127
Number of pages6
JournalArab Journal of Urology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cystectomy
Root Cause Analysis
Annual Reports
Health Care Sector
Learning Curve
Learning
Technology
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Charts
  • Cumulative summation
  • Quality assurance
  • Systematic methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Systematic methods for measuring outcomes : How they may be used to improve outcomes after radical cystectomy. / Siddiqui, Khurram M.; Izawa, Jonathan I.

In: Arab Journal of Urology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 294, 01.06.2015, p. 122-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{227753de2916414caad75da5f7a79ee2,
title = "Systematic methods for measuring outcomes: How they may be used to improve outcomes after radical cystectomy",
abstract = "Abstract In the era of managed healthcare, the measuring and reporting of surgical outcomes is a universal mandate. The outcomes should be monitored and reported in a timely manner. Methods for measuring surgical outcomes should be continuous, free of bias and accommodate variations in patient factors. The traditional methods of surgical audits are periodic, resource-intensive and have a potential for bias. These audits are typically annual and therefore there is a long time lag before any effective remedial action could be taken. To reduce this delay the manufacturing industry has long used statistical control-chart monitoring systems, as they offer continuous monitoring and are better suited to monitoring outcomes systematically and promptly. The healthcare industry is now embracing such systematic methods. Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex surgical procedures. Systematic methods for measuring outcomes after RC can identify areas of improvements on an ongoing basis, which can be used to initiate timely corrective measures. We review the available methods to improve the outcomes. Cumulative summation charts have the potential to be a robust method which can prompt early warnings and thus initiate an analysis of root causes. This early-warning system might help to resolve the issue promptly with no need to wait for the report of annual audits. This system can also be helpful for monitoring learning curves for individuals, both in training or when learning a new technology.",
keywords = "Charts, Cumulative summation, Quality assurance, Systematic methods",
author = "Siddiqui, {Khurram M.} and Izawa, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aju.2015.02.008",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "122--127",
journal = "Arab Journal of Urology",
issn = "2090-598X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic methods for measuring outcomes

T2 - How they may be used to improve outcomes after radical cystectomy

AU - Siddiqui, Khurram M.

AU - Izawa, Jonathan I.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Abstract In the era of managed healthcare, the measuring and reporting of surgical outcomes is a universal mandate. The outcomes should be monitored and reported in a timely manner. Methods for measuring surgical outcomes should be continuous, free of bias and accommodate variations in patient factors. The traditional methods of surgical audits are periodic, resource-intensive and have a potential for bias. These audits are typically annual and therefore there is a long time lag before any effective remedial action could be taken. To reduce this delay the manufacturing industry has long used statistical control-chart monitoring systems, as they offer continuous monitoring and are better suited to monitoring outcomes systematically and promptly. The healthcare industry is now embracing such systematic methods. Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex surgical procedures. Systematic methods for measuring outcomes after RC can identify areas of improvements on an ongoing basis, which can be used to initiate timely corrective measures. We review the available methods to improve the outcomes. Cumulative summation charts have the potential to be a robust method which can prompt early warnings and thus initiate an analysis of root causes. This early-warning system might help to resolve the issue promptly with no need to wait for the report of annual audits. This system can also be helpful for monitoring learning curves for individuals, both in training or when learning a new technology.

AB - Abstract In the era of managed healthcare, the measuring and reporting of surgical outcomes is a universal mandate. The outcomes should be monitored and reported in a timely manner. Methods for measuring surgical outcomes should be continuous, free of bias and accommodate variations in patient factors. The traditional methods of surgical audits are periodic, resource-intensive and have a potential for bias. These audits are typically annual and therefore there is a long time lag before any effective remedial action could be taken. To reduce this delay the manufacturing industry has long used statistical control-chart monitoring systems, as they offer continuous monitoring and are better suited to monitoring outcomes systematically and promptly. The healthcare industry is now embracing such systematic methods. Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex surgical procedures. Systematic methods for measuring outcomes after RC can identify areas of improvements on an ongoing basis, which can be used to initiate timely corrective measures. We review the available methods to improve the outcomes. Cumulative summation charts have the potential to be a robust method which can prompt early warnings and thus initiate an analysis of root causes. This early-warning system might help to resolve the issue promptly with no need to wait for the report of annual audits. This system can also be helpful for monitoring learning curves for individuals, both in training or when learning a new technology.

KW - Charts

KW - Cumulative summation

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Systematic methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930042256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930042256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aju.2015.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.aju.2015.02.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930042256

VL - 13

SP - 122

EP - 127

JO - Arab Journal of Urology

JF - Arab Journal of Urology

SN - 2090-598X

IS - 2

M1 - 294

ER -