Rehabilitation outcomes of cardiac and non-cardiac anoxic brain injury

A single institution experience

D. T. Burke, M. K. Shah, A. S S Dorvlo, Samir Al-Adawi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with anoxic brain injury (ABI) due to cardiac and non-cardiac aetiologies. Design: Retrospective chart review over 4 years. Setting: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirteen patients with cardiac ABI and 13 patients with non-cardiac ABI. Intervention: Comprehensive, multi-disciplinary inpatient rehabilitation services. Main outcome measures: Rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and its various sub-sets on admission and discharge; FIM efficiency and change; and discharge disposition. Results: Patients with cardiac ABI were similar in gender and ethnicity when compared to patients with non-cardiac ABI but were older (average age 52 vs 42) with a higher percentage of cardiac patients married (77% vs 39%). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups on all sub-sets of the FIM on admission and discharge as well as the different FIM efficiencies. However, there was a trend for the cardiac ABI patients to have a greater efficiency in improving mobility during rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. The rehabilitation hospital LOS was ∼28 days less for patients with cardiac ABI (41.49 vs 69.84 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). The mean rehabilitation cost for patients with cardiac ABI was ∼ $14 000 less than that for those with non-cardiac ABI ($44 181 vs $58 187). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Cardiac ABI patients were more likely to be discharged directly to home from rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients (p = 0.06). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates some differences in the recovery patterns of patients with ABI who had a cardiac aetiology and those who had non-cardiac aetiologies. While both groups experienced similar progress during rehabilitation, those with cardiac ABI made gains with a shorter LOS and less rehabilitation costs when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. These data suggest a trend towards greater cost and length of stay for patients with ABI who had non-cardiac aetiologies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-680
Number of pages6
JournalBrain Injury
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 20 2005

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Rehabilitation
Length of Stay
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Costs
Inpatients

Keywords

  • Anoxia
  • Brain injury
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Rehabilitation outcomes of cardiac and non-cardiac anoxic brain injury : A single institution experience. / Burke, D. T.; Shah, M. K.; Dorvlo, A. S S; Al-Adawi, Samir.

In: Brain Injury, Vol. 19, No. 9, 20.08.2005, p. 675-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burke, D. T. ; Shah, M. K. ; Dorvlo, A. S S ; Al-Adawi, Samir. / Rehabilitation outcomes of cardiac and non-cardiac anoxic brain injury : A single institution experience. In: Brain Injury. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 9. pp. 675-680.
@article{994696c87d7343ae9abeb8ec9dee103d,
title = "Rehabilitation outcomes of cardiac and non-cardiac anoxic brain injury: A single institution experience",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with anoxic brain injury (ABI) due to cardiac and non-cardiac aetiologies. Design: Retrospective chart review over 4 years. Setting: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirteen patients with cardiac ABI and 13 patients with non-cardiac ABI. Intervention: Comprehensive, multi-disciplinary inpatient rehabilitation services. Main outcome measures: Rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and its various sub-sets on admission and discharge; FIM efficiency and change; and discharge disposition. Results: Patients with cardiac ABI were similar in gender and ethnicity when compared to patients with non-cardiac ABI but were older (average age 52 vs 42) with a higher percentage of cardiac patients married (77{\%} vs 39{\%}). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups on all sub-sets of the FIM on admission and discharge as well as the different FIM efficiencies. However, there was a trend for the cardiac ABI patients to have a greater efficiency in improving mobility during rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. The rehabilitation hospital LOS was ∼28 days less for patients with cardiac ABI (41.49 vs 69.84 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). The mean rehabilitation cost for patients with cardiac ABI was ∼ $14 000 less than that for those with non-cardiac ABI ($44 181 vs $58 187). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Cardiac ABI patients were more likely to be discharged directly to home from rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients (p = 0.06). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates some differences in the recovery patterns of patients with ABI who had a cardiac aetiology and those who had non-cardiac aetiologies. While both groups experienced similar progress during rehabilitation, those with cardiac ABI made gains with a shorter LOS and less rehabilitation costs when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. These data suggest a trend towards greater cost and length of stay for patients with ABI who had non-cardiac aetiologies.",
keywords = "Anoxia, Brain injury, Rehabilitation",
author = "Burke, {D. T.} and Shah, {M. K.} and Dorvlo, {A. S S} and Samir Al-Adawi",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/02699050400024953",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "675--680",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation outcomes of cardiac and non-cardiac anoxic brain injury

T2 - A single institution experience

AU - Burke, D. T.

AU - Shah, M. K.

AU - Dorvlo, A. S S

AU - Al-Adawi, Samir

PY - 2005/8/20

Y1 - 2005/8/20

N2 - Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with anoxic brain injury (ABI) due to cardiac and non-cardiac aetiologies. Design: Retrospective chart review over 4 years. Setting: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirteen patients with cardiac ABI and 13 patients with non-cardiac ABI. Intervention: Comprehensive, multi-disciplinary inpatient rehabilitation services. Main outcome measures: Rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and its various sub-sets on admission and discharge; FIM efficiency and change; and discharge disposition. Results: Patients with cardiac ABI were similar in gender and ethnicity when compared to patients with non-cardiac ABI but were older (average age 52 vs 42) with a higher percentage of cardiac patients married (77% vs 39%). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups on all sub-sets of the FIM on admission and discharge as well as the different FIM efficiencies. However, there was a trend for the cardiac ABI patients to have a greater efficiency in improving mobility during rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. The rehabilitation hospital LOS was ∼28 days less for patients with cardiac ABI (41.49 vs 69.84 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). The mean rehabilitation cost for patients with cardiac ABI was ∼ $14 000 less than that for those with non-cardiac ABI ($44 181 vs $58 187). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Cardiac ABI patients were more likely to be discharged directly to home from rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients (p = 0.06). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates some differences in the recovery patterns of patients with ABI who had a cardiac aetiology and those who had non-cardiac aetiologies. While both groups experienced similar progress during rehabilitation, those with cardiac ABI made gains with a shorter LOS and less rehabilitation costs when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. These data suggest a trend towards greater cost and length of stay for patients with ABI who had non-cardiac aetiologies.

AB - Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with anoxic brain injury (ABI) due to cardiac and non-cardiac aetiologies. Design: Retrospective chart review over 4 years. Setting: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirteen patients with cardiac ABI and 13 patients with non-cardiac ABI. Intervention: Comprehensive, multi-disciplinary inpatient rehabilitation services. Main outcome measures: Rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and its various sub-sets on admission and discharge; FIM efficiency and change; and discharge disposition. Results: Patients with cardiac ABI were similar in gender and ethnicity when compared to patients with non-cardiac ABI but were older (average age 52 vs 42) with a higher percentage of cardiac patients married (77% vs 39%). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups on all sub-sets of the FIM on admission and discharge as well as the different FIM efficiencies. However, there was a trend for the cardiac ABI patients to have a greater efficiency in improving mobility during rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. The rehabilitation hospital LOS was ∼28 days less for patients with cardiac ABI (41.49 vs 69.84 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). The mean rehabilitation cost for patients with cardiac ABI was ∼ $14 000 less than that for those with non-cardiac ABI ($44 181 vs $58 187). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Cardiac ABI patients were more likely to be discharged directly to home from rehabilitation when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients (p = 0.06). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates some differences in the recovery patterns of patients with ABI who had a cardiac aetiology and those who had non-cardiac aetiologies. While both groups experienced similar progress during rehabilitation, those with cardiac ABI made gains with a shorter LOS and less rehabilitation costs when compared to non-cardiac ABI patients. These data suggest a trend towards greater cost and length of stay for patients with ABI who had non-cardiac aetiologies.

KW - Anoxia

KW - Brain injury

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844453373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844453373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699050400024953

DO - 10.1080/02699050400024953

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 675

EP - 680

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

IS - 9

ER -