Modeling phase change materials embedded in building enclosure: A review

Saleh Nasser Al-Saadi, Zhiqiang Zhai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thermal energy storage (TES) has the capability to absorb, store and release heat based on dynamic surrounding environmental conditions. Sensible energy storage captures or releases heat with changes in material's temperature while latent heat is associated with a phase change at an isotherm or near isothermal temperature. Latent heat storage such as using a phase change material (PCM) gains growing attentions recently due to its ability of storing significant thermal energy within a small volume, making it one of most promising technologies for developing energy efficient buildings. To quantify their technical and economic feasibility for building's applications, computational models of TES that can be integrated into whole building energy simulations are highly demanded. This paper reviews the different modeling methods generally used for PCM simulations. A few numerical modeling methods are observed in literature for modeling PCMs including the enthalpy method, the heat capacity method, the temperature transforming model, and the heat source method. The study compares and highlights the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of these models and methods. It particularly explores the viability of these methods for building applications. The paper further reviews the PCM models that have been integrated into prevalent whole building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, TRNSYS, ESP-r etc. The study reveals that the heat capacity method is mostly used in programs, despite of its limitations on time and spatial resolutions. Further research is found necessary to identify the efficiency and accuracy of these methods in building applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)659-673
Number of pages15
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Phase change materials
Enclosures
Thermal energy
Energy storage
Latent heat
Specific heat
Heat storage
Pulse code modulation
Temperature
Isotherms
Enthalpy
Economics
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Building enclosure
  • Numerical models
  • Phase change material
  • Thermal energy storage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Modeling phase change materials embedded in building enclosure : A review. / Al-Saadi, Saleh Nasser; Zhai, Zhiqiang.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 21, 2013, p. 659-673.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{95ef55dfa3ae49d8a53c510ac43758f9,
title = "Modeling phase change materials embedded in building enclosure: A review",
abstract = "Thermal energy storage (TES) has the capability to absorb, store and release heat based on dynamic surrounding environmental conditions. Sensible energy storage captures or releases heat with changes in material's temperature while latent heat is associated with a phase change at an isotherm or near isothermal temperature. Latent heat storage such as using a phase change material (PCM) gains growing attentions recently due to its ability of storing significant thermal energy within a small volume, making it one of most promising technologies for developing energy efficient buildings. To quantify their technical and economic feasibility for building's applications, computational models of TES that can be integrated into whole building energy simulations are highly demanded. This paper reviews the different modeling methods generally used for PCM simulations. A few numerical modeling methods are observed in literature for modeling PCMs including the enthalpy method, the heat capacity method, the temperature transforming model, and the heat source method. The study compares and highlights the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of these models and methods. It particularly explores the viability of these methods for building applications. The paper further reviews the PCM models that have been integrated into prevalent whole building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, TRNSYS, ESP-r etc. The study reveals that the heat capacity method is mostly used in programs, despite of its limitations on time and spatial resolutions. Further research is found necessary to identify the efficiency and accuracy of these methods in building applications.",
keywords = "Building enclosure, Numerical models, Phase change material, Thermal energy storage",
author = "Al-Saadi, {Saleh Nasser} and Zhiqiang Zhai",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.024",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "659--673",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling phase change materials embedded in building enclosure

T2 - A review

AU - Al-Saadi, Saleh Nasser

AU - Zhai, Zhiqiang

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Thermal energy storage (TES) has the capability to absorb, store and release heat based on dynamic surrounding environmental conditions. Sensible energy storage captures or releases heat with changes in material's temperature while latent heat is associated with a phase change at an isotherm or near isothermal temperature. Latent heat storage such as using a phase change material (PCM) gains growing attentions recently due to its ability of storing significant thermal energy within a small volume, making it one of most promising technologies for developing energy efficient buildings. To quantify their technical and economic feasibility for building's applications, computational models of TES that can be integrated into whole building energy simulations are highly demanded. This paper reviews the different modeling methods generally used for PCM simulations. A few numerical modeling methods are observed in literature for modeling PCMs including the enthalpy method, the heat capacity method, the temperature transforming model, and the heat source method. The study compares and highlights the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of these models and methods. It particularly explores the viability of these methods for building applications. The paper further reviews the PCM models that have been integrated into prevalent whole building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, TRNSYS, ESP-r etc. The study reveals that the heat capacity method is mostly used in programs, despite of its limitations on time and spatial resolutions. Further research is found necessary to identify the efficiency and accuracy of these methods in building applications.

AB - Thermal energy storage (TES) has the capability to absorb, store and release heat based on dynamic surrounding environmental conditions. Sensible energy storage captures or releases heat with changes in material's temperature while latent heat is associated with a phase change at an isotherm or near isothermal temperature. Latent heat storage such as using a phase change material (PCM) gains growing attentions recently due to its ability of storing significant thermal energy within a small volume, making it one of most promising technologies for developing energy efficient buildings. To quantify their technical and economic feasibility for building's applications, computational models of TES that can be integrated into whole building energy simulations are highly demanded. This paper reviews the different modeling methods generally used for PCM simulations. A few numerical modeling methods are observed in literature for modeling PCMs including the enthalpy method, the heat capacity method, the temperature transforming model, and the heat source method. The study compares and highlights the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of these models and methods. It particularly explores the viability of these methods for building applications. The paper further reviews the PCM models that have been integrated into prevalent whole building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, TRNSYS, ESP-r etc. The study reveals that the heat capacity method is mostly used in programs, despite of its limitations on time and spatial resolutions. Further research is found necessary to identify the efficiency and accuracy of these methods in building applications.

KW - Building enclosure

KW - Numerical models

KW - Phase change material

KW - Thermal energy storage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874610709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874610709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.024

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.024

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84874610709

VL - 21

SP - 659

EP - 673

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -