Key performance indicators for excellent teachers in Malaysia

A measurement model for excellent teaching practices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to create a key performance indicator (KPI) that can be used as the benchmark tool for teaching performance and practices of both excellent teachers (ETs) and non-ETs and to investigate the possible interrelationships between the five thinking domains (teachers’ teaching philosophy, teaching objective, pedagogical content knowledge, teachers’ expectations and management style). Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a quantitative approach with a sample of 306 ETs from eight states including the Federal Territory. Exploratory factor analysis was used to validate the instrument and confirmatory factor analysis for model fit. Findings: The findings showed that an excellent classroom management style was the most significant domain for KPI with the highest factor loading, followed by ETs’ teaching philosophy and objectives. It revealed that there was no significant relationship between ETs’ expectations and their classroom management style and that the relationships between the other domains were weak. Originality/value: With this research creating a KPI model for excellent teaching practices, it is suggested that an in-depth review should be conducted concerning the standardization of the classroom management and the national teaching objectives in Malaysia. Perhaps representatives from the Ministry of Education and the school principals could go into the field to determine whether the excellent and non-ETs are fulfilling the national education objectives and meeting the expectations. This could lead to setting KPIs for achieving teaching objectives among the ETs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-319
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Key performance indicators
Malaysia
Measurement model
Management styles
Education
School principals
Factor loadings
Design methodology
Exploratory factor analysis
Confirmatory factor analysis
Interrelationship
Benchmark
Standardization

Keywords

  • Continuous improvement
  • Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{08e7bcd579124a30b32d9efe01b921ca,
title = "Key performance indicators for excellent teachers in Malaysia: A measurement model for excellent teaching practices",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to create a key performance indicator (KPI) that can be used as the benchmark tool for teaching performance and practices of both excellent teachers (ETs) and non-ETs and to investigate the possible interrelationships between the five thinking domains (teachers’ teaching philosophy, teaching objective, pedagogical content knowledge, teachers’ expectations and management style). Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a quantitative approach with a sample of 306 ETs from eight states including the Federal Territory. Exploratory factor analysis was used to validate the instrument and confirmatory factor analysis for model fit. Findings: The findings showed that an excellent classroom management style was the most significant domain for KPI with the highest factor loading, followed by ETs’ teaching philosophy and objectives. It revealed that there was no significant relationship between ETs’ expectations and their classroom management style and that the relationships between the other domains were weak. Originality/value: With this research creating a KPI model for excellent teaching practices, it is suggested that an in-depth review should be conducted concerning the standardization of the classroom management and the national teaching objectives in Malaysia. Perhaps representatives from the Ministry of Education and the school principals could go into the field to determine whether the excellent and non-ETs are fulfilling the national education objectives and meeting the expectations. This could lead to setting KPIs for achieving teaching objectives among the ETs.",
keywords = "Continuous improvement, Education",
author = "Amzat, {Ismail Hussein}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0094",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "298--319",
journal = "International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management",
issn = "1741-0401",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key performance indicators for excellent teachers in Malaysia

T2 - A measurement model for excellent teaching practices

AU - Amzat, Ismail Hussein

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to create a key performance indicator (KPI) that can be used as the benchmark tool for teaching performance and practices of both excellent teachers (ETs) and non-ETs and to investigate the possible interrelationships between the five thinking domains (teachers’ teaching philosophy, teaching objective, pedagogical content knowledge, teachers’ expectations and management style). Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a quantitative approach with a sample of 306 ETs from eight states including the Federal Territory. Exploratory factor analysis was used to validate the instrument and confirmatory factor analysis for model fit. Findings: The findings showed that an excellent classroom management style was the most significant domain for KPI with the highest factor loading, followed by ETs’ teaching philosophy and objectives. It revealed that there was no significant relationship between ETs’ expectations and their classroom management style and that the relationships between the other domains were weak. Originality/value: With this research creating a KPI model for excellent teaching practices, it is suggested that an in-depth review should be conducted concerning the standardization of the classroom management and the national teaching objectives in Malaysia. Perhaps representatives from the Ministry of Education and the school principals could go into the field to determine whether the excellent and non-ETs are fulfilling the national education objectives and meeting the expectations. This could lead to setting KPIs for achieving teaching objectives among the ETs.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to create a key performance indicator (KPI) that can be used as the benchmark tool for teaching performance and practices of both excellent teachers (ETs) and non-ETs and to investigate the possible interrelationships between the five thinking domains (teachers’ teaching philosophy, teaching objective, pedagogical content knowledge, teachers’ expectations and management style). Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a quantitative approach with a sample of 306 ETs from eight states including the Federal Territory. Exploratory factor analysis was used to validate the instrument and confirmatory factor analysis for model fit. Findings: The findings showed that an excellent classroom management style was the most significant domain for KPI with the highest factor loading, followed by ETs’ teaching philosophy and objectives. It revealed that there was no significant relationship between ETs’ expectations and their classroom management style and that the relationships between the other domains were weak. Originality/value: With this research creating a KPI model for excellent teaching practices, it is suggested that an in-depth review should be conducted concerning the standardization of the classroom management and the national teaching objectives in Malaysia. Perhaps representatives from the Ministry of Education and the school principals could go into the field to determine whether the excellent and non-ETs are fulfilling the national education objectives and meeting the expectations. This could lead to setting KPIs for achieving teaching objectives among the ETs.

KW - Continuous improvement

KW - Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011579674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011579674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0094

DO - 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0094

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 298

EP - 319

JO - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

JF - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

SN - 1741-0401

IS - 3

ER -