Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study

Ali Al-Aufi, Crystal Fulton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics' patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. Design/methodology/approach - A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. Findings - Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. Research limitations/implications - Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total-382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences' academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Originality/value - Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-241
Number of pages18
JournalElectronic Library
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 7 2015

Fingerprint

informal communication
networking
communication
Communication
Social sciences
social science
Oman
subject of study
response behavior
statistical significance
online survey
proliferation
Ireland
Developing countries
developing country
interpretation
questionnaire
university
methodology

Keywords

  • Informal scholarly communication
  • Scholarly communication
  • Social media
  • Social networking tools
  • Sultan qaboos university
  • University college Dublin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication : A cross-institutional study. / Al-Aufi, Ali; Fulton, Crystal.

In: Electronic Library, Vol. 33, No. 2, 07.04.2015, p. 224-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5c9c72f242842bca2d8b2c5a4076153,
title = "Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study",
abstract = "Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics' patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. Design/methodology/approach - A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. Findings - Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. Research limitations/implications - Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total-382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences' academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Originality/value - Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.",
keywords = "Informal scholarly communication, Scholarly communication, Social media, Social networking tools, Sultan qaboos university, University college Dublin",
author = "Ali Al-Aufi and Crystal Fulton",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "224--241",
journal = "Electronic Library",
issn = "0264-0473",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication

T2 - A cross-institutional study

AU - Al-Aufi, Ali

AU - Fulton, Crystal

PY - 2015/4/7

Y1 - 2015/4/7

N2 - Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics' patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. Design/methodology/approach - A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. Findings - Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. Research limitations/implications - Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total-382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences' academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Originality/value - Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.

AB - Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics' patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. Design/methodology/approach - A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. Findings - Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. Research limitations/implications - Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total-382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences' academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Originality/value - Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.

KW - Informal scholarly communication

KW - Scholarly communication

KW - Social media

KW - Social networking tools

KW - Sultan qaboos university

KW - University college Dublin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928720799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928720799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093

DO - 10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928720799

VL - 33

SP - 224

EP - 241

JO - Electronic Library

JF - Electronic Library

SN - 0264-0473

IS - 2

ER -