Impact of changing combustion chamber geometry on emissions, and combustion characteristics of a single cylinder SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with ethanol/gasoline blends

Ahmad O. Hasan, Hani Al-Rawashdeh, Ala Al-Muhtaseb, Ahmad Abu-jrai, Read Ahmad, Joseph Zeaiter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the range of opportunities and future prospects of presenting a blend of gasoline/ethanol fuel to run a gasoline engine. Biofuel's advantages involve emission of low quantities of contaminants to the atmosphere and its renewable character in order to trim down dependency on gasoline as a fuel. Analyses have been carried out to show the influence of compression ratio on engine performance and tailpipe emissions by using unleaded gasoline and gasoline blends with (10 and 20%) pure ethanol SI (spark ignition) engine having a variable compression ratio with the air-cooled single-cylinder engine. Experiments were conducted on five different compression ratios (CRs) of 4:1, 5.5:1, 7:1 8.5:1, and 10:1 with a wide-open throttle. Two combinations of blended fuels were compared to the unleaded gasoline. The results showed that the BMEP (brake mean effective pressure), BTE (brake thermal efficiency), and BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) obtained with the use of gasoline blends at all CRs were generally higher in comparison to those of pure gasoline. In general, gasoline blends provided a lower exhaust emission compared to gasoline's emissions at all CRs. Furthermore, NOx emissions were affected much more than other exhaust emissions when changing the compression ratios compared to unleaded gasoline.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-203
Number of pages7
JournalFuel
Volume231
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Engine cylinders
Combustion chambers
Internal combustion engines
Gasoline
Ethanol
Geometry
Brakes
Engines
Compression ratio (machinery)
Ethanol fuels
Biofuels
Fuel consumption
Impurities

Keywords

  • Combustion characteristics
  • Compression ratio
  • Ethanol/gasoline blends
  • Exhaust emissions
  • Spark ignition engine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Impact of changing combustion chamber geometry on emissions, and combustion characteristics of a single cylinder SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with ethanol/gasoline blends. / Hasan, Ahmad O.; Al-Rawashdeh, Hani; Al-Muhtaseb, Ala; Abu-jrai, Ahmad; Ahmad, Read; Zeaiter, Joseph.

In: Fuel, Vol. 231, 01.11.2018, p. 197-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b29e5ab2e284d0c8cb3db773ced9a16,
title = "Impact of changing combustion chamber geometry on emissions, and combustion characteristics of a single cylinder SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with ethanol/gasoline blends",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the range of opportunities and future prospects of presenting a blend of gasoline/ethanol fuel to run a gasoline engine. Biofuel's advantages involve emission of low quantities of contaminants to the atmosphere and its renewable character in order to trim down dependency on gasoline as a fuel. Analyses have been carried out to show the influence of compression ratio on engine performance and tailpipe emissions by using unleaded gasoline and gasoline blends with (10 and 20{\%}) pure ethanol SI (spark ignition) engine having a variable compression ratio with the air-cooled single-cylinder engine. Experiments were conducted on five different compression ratios (CRs) of 4:1, 5.5:1, 7:1 8.5:1, and 10:1 with a wide-open throttle. Two combinations of blended fuels were compared to the unleaded gasoline. The results showed that the BMEP (brake mean effective pressure), BTE (brake thermal efficiency), and BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) obtained with the use of gasoline blends at all CRs were generally higher in comparison to those of pure gasoline. In general, gasoline blends provided a lower exhaust emission compared to gasoline's emissions at all CRs. Furthermore, NOx emissions were affected much more than other exhaust emissions when changing the compression ratios compared to unleaded gasoline.",
keywords = "Combustion characteristics, Compression ratio, Ethanol/gasoline blends, Exhaust emissions, Spark ignition engine",
author = "Hasan, {Ahmad O.} and Hani Al-Rawashdeh and Ala Al-Muhtaseb and Ahmad Abu-jrai and Read Ahmad and Joseph Zeaiter",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.045",
language = "English",
volume = "231",
pages = "197--203",
journal = "Fuel",
issn = "0016-2361",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of changing combustion chamber geometry on emissions, and combustion characteristics of a single cylinder SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with ethanol/gasoline blends

AU - Hasan, Ahmad O.

AU - Al-Rawashdeh, Hani

AU - Al-Muhtaseb, Ala

AU - Abu-jrai, Ahmad

AU - Ahmad, Read

AU - Zeaiter, Joseph

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the range of opportunities and future prospects of presenting a blend of gasoline/ethanol fuel to run a gasoline engine. Biofuel's advantages involve emission of low quantities of contaminants to the atmosphere and its renewable character in order to trim down dependency on gasoline as a fuel. Analyses have been carried out to show the influence of compression ratio on engine performance and tailpipe emissions by using unleaded gasoline and gasoline blends with (10 and 20%) pure ethanol SI (spark ignition) engine having a variable compression ratio with the air-cooled single-cylinder engine. Experiments were conducted on five different compression ratios (CRs) of 4:1, 5.5:1, 7:1 8.5:1, and 10:1 with a wide-open throttle. Two combinations of blended fuels were compared to the unleaded gasoline. The results showed that the BMEP (brake mean effective pressure), BTE (brake thermal efficiency), and BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) obtained with the use of gasoline blends at all CRs were generally higher in comparison to those of pure gasoline. In general, gasoline blends provided a lower exhaust emission compared to gasoline's emissions at all CRs. Furthermore, NOx emissions were affected much more than other exhaust emissions when changing the compression ratios compared to unleaded gasoline.

AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the range of opportunities and future prospects of presenting a blend of gasoline/ethanol fuel to run a gasoline engine. Biofuel's advantages involve emission of low quantities of contaminants to the atmosphere and its renewable character in order to trim down dependency on gasoline as a fuel. Analyses have been carried out to show the influence of compression ratio on engine performance and tailpipe emissions by using unleaded gasoline and gasoline blends with (10 and 20%) pure ethanol SI (spark ignition) engine having a variable compression ratio with the air-cooled single-cylinder engine. Experiments were conducted on five different compression ratios (CRs) of 4:1, 5.5:1, 7:1 8.5:1, and 10:1 with a wide-open throttle. Two combinations of blended fuels were compared to the unleaded gasoline. The results showed that the BMEP (brake mean effective pressure), BTE (brake thermal efficiency), and BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) obtained with the use of gasoline blends at all CRs were generally higher in comparison to those of pure gasoline. In general, gasoline blends provided a lower exhaust emission compared to gasoline's emissions at all CRs. Furthermore, NOx emissions were affected much more than other exhaust emissions when changing the compression ratios compared to unleaded gasoline.

KW - Combustion characteristics

KW - Compression ratio

KW - Ethanol/gasoline blends

KW - Exhaust emissions

KW - Spark ignition engine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047245596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047245596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.045

DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.045

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047245596

VL - 231

SP - 197

EP - 203

JO - Fuel

JF - Fuel

SN - 0016-2361

ER -