Development of Arabic library and information science

An analysis utilizing Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of sciences

Ali Saif Al-Aufi, Peter Johan Lor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to utilize Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of the sciences and build on research carried on by Aarek et al., Vakkari, Rochester and Vakkari, and Åström, to analyze both intellectual and institutional characteristics of Arabic library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach: Data derived from a content analysis of sampled research articles published in seven core peer-reviewed Arabic LIS journals and from an inventory of the currently identified Arabic LIS educational institutions, professional associations, and scholarly communication channels were analyzed in terms of Whitley's theory and relevant LIS research. Findings: The social organization of Arabic LIS has highly influenced its intellectual organization. An analysis of types and diversity of institutional affiliations, determination of terminology, resources and fund accessibility, scholarly communication of intellectual productivity, and research collaboration point to high levels of "tasks uncertainty", low levels of "mutual dependency" and uncontrolled "reputational autonomy". Research limitations/implications: Because Arabic LIS institutions, associations, and research channels are poorly represented on the internet or in accessible literature, it was difficult to collect data comprehensively. While the findings are suggestive and are in agreement with views from the Arabic LIS literature, the results cannot be generalized to regions beyond the Arab world. This investigation is not primarily intended as a contribution to the philosophy of LIS, but to describe the development of LIS in the Arab States within a broad social and intellectual framework. Originality/value: While there is a considerable body of theoretically-oriented interpretations for bibliometric findings, no research has been conducted to analyze the social and intellectual dimensions of LIS in the Arab world. This paper also fills a gap for this type of the research in Arabic LIS and creates awareness of Arabic LIS for English-speaking readers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-491
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Documentation
Volume68
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

organization of science
Information science
information science
organization
Arab
communication
professional association
Terminology
educational institution

Keywords

  • Communication process
  • Information management
  • Intellectual and social organization of sciences
  • Library and information networks
  • LIS research
  • Scholarly communication
  • The Arab world

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{738a64e4fc3743988dd29a050340ff66,
title = "Development of Arabic library and information science: An analysis utilizing Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of sciences",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to utilize Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of the sciences and build on research carried on by Aarek et al., Vakkari, Rochester and Vakkari, and {\AA}str{\"o}m, to analyze both intellectual and institutional characteristics of Arabic library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach: Data derived from a content analysis of sampled research articles published in seven core peer-reviewed Arabic LIS journals and from an inventory of the currently identified Arabic LIS educational institutions, professional associations, and scholarly communication channels were analyzed in terms of Whitley's theory and relevant LIS research. Findings: The social organization of Arabic LIS has highly influenced its intellectual organization. An analysis of types and diversity of institutional affiliations, determination of terminology, resources and fund accessibility, scholarly communication of intellectual productivity, and research collaboration point to high levels of {"}tasks uncertainty{"}, low levels of {"}mutual dependency{"} and uncontrolled {"}reputational autonomy{"}. Research limitations/implications: Because Arabic LIS institutions, associations, and research channels are poorly represented on the internet or in accessible literature, it was difficult to collect data comprehensively. While the findings are suggestive and are in agreement with views from the Arabic LIS literature, the results cannot be generalized to regions beyond the Arab world. This investigation is not primarily intended as a contribution to the philosophy of LIS, but to describe the development of LIS in the Arab States within a broad social and intellectual framework. Originality/value: While there is a considerable body of theoretically-oriented interpretations for bibliometric findings, no research has been conducted to analyze the social and intellectual dimensions of LIS in the Arab world. This paper also fills a gap for this type of the research in Arabic LIS and creates awareness of Arabic LIS for English-speaking readers.",
keywords = "Communication process, Information management, Intellectual and social organization of sciences, Library and information networks, LIS research, Scholarly communication, The Arab world",
author = "Al-Aufi, {Ali Saif} and Lor, {Peter Johan}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1108/00220411211239066",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "460--491",
journal = "Journal of Documentation",
issn = "0022-0418",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of Arabic library and information science

T2 - An analysis utilizing Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of sciences

AU - Al-Aufi, Ali Saif

AU - Lor, Peter Johan

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to utilize Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of the sciences and build on research carried on by Aarek et al., Vakkari, Rochester and Vakkari, and Åström, to analyze both intellectual and institutional characteristics of Arabic library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach: Data derived from a content analysis of sampled research articles published in seven core peer-reviewed Arabic LIS journals and from an inventory of the currently identified Arabic LIS educational institutions, professional associations, and scholarly communication channels were analyzed in terms of Whitley's theory and relevant LIS research. Findings: The social organization of Arabic LIS has highly influenced its intellectual organization. An analysis of types and diversity of institutional affiliations, determination of terminology, resources and fund accessibility, scholarly communication of intellectual productivity, and research collaboration point to high levels of "tasks uncertainty", low levels of "mutual dependency" and uncontrolled "reputational autonomy". Research limitations/implications: Because Arabic LIS institutions, associations, and research channels are poorly represented on the internet or in accessible literature, it was difficult to collect data comprehensively. While the findings are suggestive and are in agreement with views from the Arabic LIS literature, the results cannot be generalized to regions beyond the Arab world. This investigation is not primarily intended as a contribution to the philosophy of LIS, but to describe the development of LIS in the Arab States within a broad social and intellectual framework. Originality/value: While there is a considerable body of theoretically-oriented interpretations for bibliometric findings, no research has been conducted to analyze the social and intellectual dimensions of LIS in the Arab world. This paper also fills a gap for this type of the research in Arabic LIS and creates awareness of Arabic LIS for English-speaking readers.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to utilize Whitley's theory of the intellectual and social organization of the sciences and build on research carried on by Aarek et al., Vakkari, Rochester and Vakkari, and Åström, to analyze both intellectual and institutional characteristics of Arabic library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach: Data derived from a content analysis of sampled research articles published in seven core peer-reviewed Arabic LIS journals and from an inventory of the currently identified Arabic LIS educational institutions, professional associations, and scholarly communication channels were analyzed in terms of Whitley's theory and relevant LIS research. Findings: The social organization of Arabic LIS has highly influenced its intellectual organization. An analysis of types and diversity of institutional affiliations, determination of terminology, resources and fund accessibility, scholarly communication of intellectual productivity, and research collaboration point to high levels of "tasks uncertainty", low levels of "mutual dependency" and uncontrolled "reputational autonomy". Research limitations/implications: Because Arabic LIS institutions, associations, and research channels are poorly represented on the internet or in accessible literature, it was difficult to collect data comprehensively. While the findings are suggestive and are in agreement with views from the Arabic LIS literature, the results cannot be generalized to regions beyond the Arab world. This investigation is not primarily intended as a contribution to the philosophy of LIS, but to describe the development of LIS in the Arab States within a broad social and intellectual framework. Originality/value: While there is a considerable body of theoretically-oriented interpretations for bibliometric findings, no research has been conducted to analyze the social and intellectual dimensions of LIS in the Arab world. This paper also fills a gap for this type of the research in Arabic LIS and creates awareness of Arabic LIS for English-speaking readers.

KW - Communication process

KW - Information management

KW - Intellectual and social organization of sciences

KW - Library and information networks

KW - LIS research

KW - Scholarly communication

KW - The Arab world

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863787038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863787038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/00220411211239066

DO - 10.1108/00220411211239066

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 460

EP - 491

JO - Journal of Documentation

JF - Journal of Documentation

SN - 0022-0418

IS - 4

ER -