Anatomy practical examinations: How does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?

Ibrahim Muhammad Inuwa, Varna Taranikanti, Maimouna Al-Rawahy, Omar Habbal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Practical examinations in anatomy are usually conducted on specimens in the anatomy laboratory (referred to here as the "traditional" method). Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™. In this study, we compare student scores between two assessment environments viz. online and traditional environments. We hypothesized that regardless of the examination medium (traditional or online) overall student performance would not be significantly different. For the online medium, radiological images, prosected specimens, and short video clips demonstrating muscle action were first acquired from resources used for teaching during anatomy practical classes. These were optimized for online viewing and then uploaded onto Moodle learning management software. With regards to the traditional format, actual specimens were usually laid out in a circular stream. Identification tags were then attached to specific spots on the specimens and questions asked regarding those identified spots. A cohort of students taking practical examinations in six courses was studied. The courses were divided into three pairs with each pair credit-weight matched. Each pair consisted of a course where the practical examination was conducted online and the other in the traditional format. There was no significant difference in the mean scores within each course pair. In addition, a significant positive correlation between score in traditional and online formats was found. We conclude that mean grades in anatomy practical examination conducted either online or in the traditional format were comparable. These findings should reassure teachers intending to use either format for their practical examinations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-32
Number of pages6
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Students
Surgical Instruments
Teaching
Software
Learning
Weights and Measures
Muscles

Keywords

  • Anatomy education
  • Computer examination
  • Gross anatomy practical examination
  • Medical education
  • Online examination
  • Paper-and-pencil examination
  • Students' assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Embryology

Cite this

Anatomy practical examinations : How does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format? / Inuwa, Ibrahim Muhammad; Taranikanti, Varna; Al-Rawahy, Maimouna; Habbal, Omar.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 27-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbeee37062914343a074a01b96e0c0ce,
title = "Anatomy practical examinations: How does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?",
abstract = "Practical examinations in anatomy are usually conducted on specimens in the anatomy laboratory (referred to here as the {"}traditional{"} method). Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™. In this study, we compare student scores between two assessment environments viz. online and traditional environments. We hypothesized that regardless of the examination medium (traditional or online) overall student performance would not be significantly different. For the online medium, radiological images, prosected specimens, and short video clips demonstrating muscle action were first acquired from resources used for teaching during anatomy practical classes. These were optimized for online viewing and then uploaded onto Moodle learning management software. With regards to the traditional format, actual specimens were usually laid out in a circular stream. Identification tags were then attached to specific spots on the specimens and questions asked regarding those identified spots. A cohort of students taking practical examinations in six courses was studied. The courses were divided into three pairs with each pair credit-weight matched. Each pair consisted of a course where the practical examination was conducted online and the other in the traditional format. There was no significant difference in the mean scores within each course pair. In addition, a significant positive correlation between score in traditional and online formats was found. We conclude that mean grades in anatomy practical examination conducted either online or in the traditional format were comparable. These findings should reassure teachers intending to use either format for their practical examinations.",
keywords = "Anatomy education, Computer examination, Gross anatomy practical examination, Medical education, Online examination, Paper-and-pencil examination, Students' assessment",
author = "Inuwa, {Ibrahim Muhammad} and Varna Taranikanti and Maimouna Al-Rawahy and Omar Habbal",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ase.254",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "27--32",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomy practical examinations

T2 - How does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?

AU - Inuwa, Ibrahim Muhammad

AU - Taranikanti, Varna

AU - Al-Rawahy, Maimouna

AU - Habbal, Omar

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Practical examinations in anatomy are usually conducted on specimens in the anatomy laboratory (referred to here as the "traditional" method). Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™. In this study, we compare student scores between two assessment environments viz. online and traditional environments. We hypothesized that regardless of the examination medium (traditional or online) overall student performance would not be significantly different. For the online medium, radiological images, prosected specimens, and short video clips demonstrating muscle action were first acquired from resources used for teaching during anatomy practical classes. These were optimized for online viewing and then uploaded onto Moodle learning management software. With regards to the traditional format, actual specimens were usually laid out in a circular stream. Identification tags were then attached to specific spots on the specimens and questions asked regarding those identified spots. A cohort of students taking practical examinations in six courses was studied. The courses were divided into three pairs with each pair credit-weight matched. Each pair consisted of a course where the practical examination was conducted online and the other in the traditional format. There was no significant difference in the mean scores within each course pair. In addition, a significant positive correlation between score in traditional and online formats was found. We conclude that mean grades in anatomy practical examination conducted either online or in the traditional format were comparable. These findings should reassure teachers intending to use either format for their practical examinations.

AB - Practical examinations in anatomy are usually conducted on specimens in the anatomy laboratory (referred to here as the "traditional" method). Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™. In this study, we compare student scores between two assessment environments viz. online and traditional environments. We hypothesized that regardless of the examination medium (traditional or online) overall student performance would not be significantly different. For the online medium, radiological images, prosected specimens, and short video clips demonstrating muscle action were first acquired from resources used for teaching during anatomy practical classes. These were optimized for online viewing and then uploaded onto Moodle learning management software. With regards to the traditional format, actual specimens were usually laid out in a circular stream. Identification tags were then attached to specific spots on the specimens and questions asked regarding those identified spots. A cohort of students taking practical examinations in six courses was studied. The courses were divided into three pairs with each pair credit-weight matched. Each pair consisted of a course where the practical examination was conducted online and the other in the traditional format. There was no significant difference in the mean scores within each course pair. In addition, a significant positive correlation between score in traditional and online formats was found. We conclude that mean grades in anatomy practical examination conducted either online or in the traditional format were comparable. These findings should reassure teachers intending to use either format for their practical examinations.

KW - Anatomy education

KW - Computer examination

KW - Gross anatomy practical examination

KW - Medical education

KW - Online examination

KW - Paper-and-pencil examination

KW - Students' assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855766709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855766709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.254

DO - 10.1002/ase.254

M3 - Article

C2 - 21916021

AN - SCOPUS:84855766709

VL - 5

SP - 27

EP - 32

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 1

ER -