A comparative study of dates export supply chain performance

The case of Oman and Tunisia

Msafiri Mbaga, Mohammed Suleiman Rashid Al-Shabibi, Houcine Boughanmi, Slim Mohamed Zekri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, is to apply the benchmarking approach to the dates export supply chain (DESC) in Oman and Tunisia (taking Tunisia as a benchmark) to identify gaps in the organizational and operational structures of the DESC in the two countries. Second, is to utilize the information generated to put forward recommendations to improve Omani DESC. Design/methodology/approach: Four benchmarking dimensions are developed, each dimension with a number of key performance indicators (KPIs). The KPIs are then used in the benchmarking exercise. Findings: Results show that Tunisia is performing better than Oman in all the four dimensions. Originality/value: The study enables the readers and the stakeholders to gain some valuable insights in the subject matter. A careful analysis of the findings should enable Oman policy makers and stakeholders to produce an industry action plan to correct the gaps and take the lead.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-408
Number of pages23
JournalBenchmarking
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Comparative study
Supply chain performance
Oman
Benchmarking
Export supply
Tunisia
Supply chain
Key performance indicators
Stakeholders
Politicians
Design methodology
Benchmark
Exercise
Industry

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Exports
  • Performance criteria
  • Sultanate of Oman
  • Tunisia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management

Cite this

A comparative study of dates export supply chain performance : The case of Oman and Tunisia. / Mbaga, Msafiri; Al-Shabibi, Mohammed Suleiman Rashid; Boughanmi, Houcine; Zekri, Slim Mohamed.

In: Benchmarking, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 386-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f006d60bdce4e4a8a970897c8d64615,
title = "A comparative study of dates export supply chain performance: The case of Oman and Tunisia",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, is to apply the benchmarking approach to the dates export supply chain (DESC) in Oman and Tunisia (taking Tunisia as a benchmark) to identify gaps in the organizational and operational structures of the DESC in the two countries. Second, is to utilize the information generated to put forward recommendations to improve Omani DESC. Design/methodology/approach: Four benchmarking dimensions are developed, each dimension with a number of key performance indicators (KPIs). The KPIs are then used in the benchmarking exercise. Findings: Results show that Tunisia is performing better than Oman in all the four dimensions. Originality/value: The study enables the readers and the stakeholders to gain some valuable insights in the subject matter. A careful analysis of the findings should enable Oman policy makers and stakeholders to produce an industry action plan to correct the gaps and take the lead.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, Exports, Performance criteria, Sultanate of Oman, Tunisia",
author = "Msafiri Mbaga and Al-Shabibi, {Mohammed Suleiman Rashid} and Houcine Boughanmi and Zekri, {Slim Mohamed}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1108/14635771111137778",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "386--408",
journal = "Benchmarking",
issn = "1463-5771",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of dates export supply chain performance

T2 - The case of Oman and Tunisia

AU - Mbaga, Msafiri

AU - Al-Shabibi, Mohammed Suleiman Rashid

AU - Boughanmi, Houcine

AU - Zekri, Slim Mohamed

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, is to apply the benchmarking approach to the dates export supply chain (DESC) in Oman and Tunisia (taking Tunisia as a benchmark) to identify gaps in the organizational and operational structures of the DESC in the two countries. Second, is to utilize the information generated to put forward recommendations to improve Omani DESC. Design/methodology/approach: Four benchmarking dimensions are developed, each dimension with a number of key performance indicators (KPIs). The KPIs are then used in the benchmarking exercise. Findings: Results show that Tunisia is performing better than Oman in all the four dimensions. Originality/value: The study enables the readers and the stakeholders to gain some valuable insights in the subject matter. A careful analysis of the findings should enable Oman policy makers and stakeholders to produce an industry action plan to correct the gaps and take the lead.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, is to apply the benchmarking approach to the dates export supply chain (DESC) in Oman and Tunisia (taking Tunisia as a benchmark) to identify gaps in the organizational and operational structures of the DESC in the two countries. Second, is to utilize the information generated to put forward recommendations to improve Omani DESC. Design/methodology/approach: Four benchmarking dimensions are developed, each dimension with a number of key performance indicators (KPIs). The KPIs are then used in the benchmarking exercise. Findings: Results show that Tunisia is performing better than Oman in all the four dimensions. Originality/value: The study enables the readers and the stakeholders to gain some valuable insights in the subject matter. A careful analysis of the findings should enable Oman policy makers and stakeholders to produce an industry action plan to correct the gaps and take the lead.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Exports

KW - Performance criteria

KW - Sultanate of Oman

KW - Tunisia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959242320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959242320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14635771111137778

DO - 10.1108/14635771111137778

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 386

EP - 408

JO - Benchmarking

JF - Benchmarking

SN - 1463-5771

IS - 3

ER -