TY - GEN
T1 - A survey of existing evaluation frameworks for service identification methods
T2 - 13th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, KMO 2018
AU - Bani-Ismail, Basel
AU - Baghdadi, Youcef
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Service identification is one of the main challenges in developing services for Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). A large number of Service Identification Methods (SIMs) have been proposed to simplify service identification. Therefore, many evaluation frameworks are available in the literature for comparing the existing SIMs. This paper aims to identify and analyze the existing evaluation frameworks for SIMs. Moreover, it aims to propose comprehensive evaluation criteria that address most aspects of the existing SIMs. A review of 23 evaluation frameworks for SIMs built the foundation for deriving a comprehensive set of 16 criteria, namely SOA lifecycle coverage, approach, input artifact, technique, types of services, service description, service quality attributes, service granularity, comprehensive, systematic, availability, tool support, adoption of existing practices, validation, configurability, and domain. The proposed criteria set can be used as a first step towards a comprehensive evaluation framework for SIMs.
AB - Service identification is one of the main challenges in developing services for Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). A large number of Service Identification Methods (SIMs) have been proposed to simplify service identification. Therefore, many evaluation frameworks are available in the literature for comparing the existing SIMs. This paper aims to identify and analyze the existing evaluation frameworks for SIMs. Moreover, it aims to propose comprehensive evaluation criteria that address most aspects of the existing SIMs. A review of 23 evaluation frameworks for SIMs built the foundation for deriving a comprehensive set of 16 criteria, namely SOA lifecycle coverage, approach, input artifact, technique, types of services, service description, service quality attributes, service granularity, comprehensive, systematic, availability, tool support, adoption of existing practices, validation, configurability, and domain. The proposed criteria set can be used as a first step towards a comprehensive evaluation framework for SIMs.
KW - Criteria
KW - Evaluation Framework
KW - Service Identification
KW - Service Identification Method
KW - Service-Oriented Architecture
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051968185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051968185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_17
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_17
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85051968185
SN - 9783319952031
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 191
EP - 202
BT - Knowledge Management in Organizations - 13th International Conference, KMO 2018, Proceedings
A2 - Hadzima, Branislav
A2 - Uden, Lorna
A2 - Ting, I-Hsien
PB - Springer Verlag
Y2 - 6 August 2018 through 10 August 2018
ER -