What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess?

Ahmed R. EL-Nahas, Raed Faisal, Tarek Mohsen, Mohammed S. AL-Marhoon, Hassan Abol-Enein

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of percutaneous and open drainage for perinephric abscess. Materials and Methods: The files of 86 patients who underwent drainage for perinephric abscesses from April 2001 through March 2008 were evaluated. The method of drainage for each patient was performed according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. Percutaneous tube drain (PCD) was used for drainage of the abscess in 43 patients (group 1), while the other 43 patients were managed with open drainage (group 2). Cure was defined as complete obliteration of the abscess cavity. The cure rates, complications, and hospital stay were compared between both groups. Results: The study included 50 males and 36 females with mean age 44.2 ± 17.3. The most common predisposing factors were diabetes mellitus and/or stones. Open drainage of perinephric abscesses resulted in a statistically significant higher cure rate (98% versus 69%, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay than PCD (3.6 versus 6 days, p < 0.001). Failure of complete drainage of multilocular abscess was observed in 8 of 13 cases (61.5%) in group 1 and one of 38 cases (2.6%) in group 2 (P < 0.001). Complications were observed in 7% of group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = 0.45). After mean follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 46 patients (19.6%) had recurrence; 7 of them were in group 1. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage of perinephric abscess is an effective minimally invasive treatment. However, PCD is not the optimal method for drainage of multilocular abscess because open surgical drainage provided higher cure rates and shorter hospitalization than PCD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Braz J Urol
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Abscess
Drainage
Length of Stay
Causality
Diabetes Mellitus
Hospitalization
Physicians
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Abscess
  • Infection
  • Kidney
  • Percutaneous
  • Perinephric
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess? / EL-Nahas, Ahmed R.; Faisal, Raed; Mohsen, Tarek; AL-Marhoon, Mohammed S.; Abol-Enein, Hassan.

In: International Braz J Urol, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 29-35.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

EL-Nahas, AR, Faisal, R, Mohsen, T, AL-Marhoon, MS & Abol-Enein, H 2010, 'What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess?', International Braz J Urol, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000100005
EL-Nahas AR, Faisal R, Mohsen T, AL-Marhoon MS, Abol-Enein H. What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess? International Braz J Urol. 2010 Jan;36(1):29-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000100005
EL-Nahas, Ahmed R. ; Faisal, Raed ; Mohsen, Tarek ; AL-Marhoon, Mohammed S. ; Abol-Enein, Hassan. / What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess?. In: International Braz J Urol. 2010 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 29-35.
@article{309439b34bf24296b04d3ec6c8f0beeb,
title = "What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess?",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the results of percutaneous and open drainage for perinephric abscess. Materials and Methods: The files of 86 patients who underwent drainage for perinephric abscesses from April 2001 through March 2008 were evaluated. The method of drainage for each patient was performed according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. Percutaneous tube drain (PCD) was used for drainage of the abscess in 43 patients (group 1), while the other 43 patients were managed with open drainage (group 2). Cure was defined as complete obliteration of the abscess cavity. The cure rates, complications, and hospital stay were compared between both groups. Results: The study included 50 males and 36 females with mean age 44.2 ± 17.3. The most common predisposing factors were diabetes mellitus and/or stones. Open drainage of perinephric abscesses resulted in a statistically significant higher cure rate (98{\%} versus 69{\%}, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay than PCD (3.6 versus 6 days, p < 0.001). Failure of complete drainage of multilocular abscess was observed in 8 of 13 cases (61.5{\%}) in group 1 and one of 38 cases (2.6{\%}) in group 2 (P < 0.001). Complications were observed in 7{\%} of group 1 and 11.5{\%} in group 2 (P = 0.45). After mean follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 46 patients (19.6{\%}) had recurrence; 7 of them were in group 1. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage of perinephric abscess is an effective minimally invasive treatment. However, PCD is not the optimal method for drainage of multilocular abscess because open surgical drainage provided higher cure rates and shorter hospitalization than PCD.",
keywords = "Abscess, Infection, Kidney, Percutaneous, Perinephric, Surgery",
author = "EL-Nahas, {Ahmed R.} and Raed Faisal and Tarek Mohsen and AL-Marhoon, {Mohammed S.} and Hassan Abol-Enein",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1590/S1677-55382010000100005",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "29--35",
journal = "International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology",
issn = "1677-5538",
publisher = "Brazilian Society of Urology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the best drainage method for a perinephric abscess?

AU - EL-Nahas, Ahmed R.

AU - Faisal, Raed

AU - Mohsen, Tarek

AU - AL-Marhoon, Mohammed S.

AU - Abol-Enein, Hassan

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the results of percutaneous and open drainage for perinephric abscess. Materials and Methods: The files of 86 patients who underwent drainage for perinephric abscesses from April 2001 through March 2008 were evaluated. The method of drainage for each patient was performed according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. Percutaneous tube drain (PCD) was used for drainage of the abscess in 43 patients (group 1), while the other 43 patients were managed with open drainage (group 2). Cure was defined as complete obliteration of the abscess cavity. The cure rates, complications, and hospital stay were compared between both groups. Results: The study included 50 males and 36 females with mean age 44.2 ± 17.3. The most common predisposing factors were diabetes mellitus and/or stones. Open drainage of perinephric abscesses resulted in a statistically significant higher cure rate (98% versus 69%, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay than PCD (3.6 versus 6 days, p < 0.001). Failure of complete drainage of multilocular abscess was observed in 8 of 13 cases (61.5%) in group 1 and one of 38 cases (2.6%) in group 2 (P < 0.001). Complications were observed in 7% of group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = 0.45). After mean follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 46 patients (19.6%) had recurrence; 7 of them were in group 1. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage of perinephric abscess is an effective minimally invasive treatment. However, PCD is not the optimal method for drainage of multilocular abscess because open surgical drainage provided higher cure rates and shorter hospitalization than PCD.

AB - Purpose: To compare the results of percutaneous and open drainage for perinephric abscess. Materials and Methods: The files of 86 patients who underwent drainage for perinephric abscesses from April 2001 through March 2008 were evaluated. The method of drainage for each patient was performed according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. Percutaneous tube drain (PCD) was used for drainage of the abscess in 43 patients (group 1), while the other 43 patients were managed with open drainage (group 2). Cure was defined as complete obliteration of the abscess cavity. The cure rates, complications, and hospital stay were compared between both groups. Results: The study included 50 males and 36 females with mean age 44.2 ± 17.3. The most common predisposing factors were diabetes mellitus and/or stones. Open drainage of perinephric abscesses resulted in a statistically significant higher cure rate (98% versus 69%, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay than PCD (3.6 versus 6 days, p < 0.001). Failure of complete drainage of multilocular abscess was observed in 8 of 13 cases (61.5%) in group 1 and one of 38 cases (2.6%) in group 2 (P < 0.001). Complications were observed in 7% of group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = 0.45). After mean follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 46 patients (19.6%) had recurrence; 7 of them were in group 1. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage of perinephric abscess is an effective minimally invasive treatment. However, PCD is not the optimal method for drainage of multilocular abscess because open surgical drainage provided higher cure rates and shorter hospitalization than PCD.

KW - Abscess

KW - Infection

KW - Kidney

KW - Percutaneous

KW - Perinephric

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953896207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953896207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1590/S1677-55382010000100005

DO - 10.1590/S1677-55382010000100005

M3 - Article

C2 - 20202232

AN - SCOPUS:77953896207

VL - 36

SP - 29

EP - 35

JO - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

JF - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

SN - 1677-5538

IS - 1

ER -

Access to Document