Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: Our experience

D. Mutreja, Vijay S. Nijhawan, V. Srinivasa, R. Lakhtakia, H. Subramanya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The cytological diagnosis of poorly differentiated tumors is challenging because the tumor cells may have morphologically difficult presentations in materials obtained by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). With the application of FNAC in primary diagnosis of malignant lesions, there has been a significant increase in the use of ancillary studies in the aspirated material. Aims: We evaluated the value of ancillary studies, namely cell blocks, immunocytochemistry (ICC) and electron microscopy (EM), in the final interpretation of FNAC smears. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cases of neoplastic swellings were subjected to FNAC. Material acquired was divided for ICC, consisting of immunoperoxidase staining of direct smears, and/or cellblocks and EM, in addition to routine light microscopy (LM). Correlation with the available histological material with immunohistochemistry and/or pertinent clinical information was used as a "gold" standard. Results: Five (7.2%) cases were excluded from the study, the material being necrotic or insufficient. Cell blocks were available in 46/64 (71.8%) cases, ICC evaluation was performed in 41/64 cases (64%) and EM studies were done in 57/64 cases (89%). Diagnostic accuracy of LM alone was 32/64 (50%). Cell blocks improved the diagnoses in 8/46 (17%) cases. The ICC data were diagnostic in 18/41 (43.9%) cases, helpful in 8/41 (19.6%) cases and non-helpful in 15/41 (36.5%) cases. EM studies were diagnostic in 22/57 (38.5%) cases, helpful in 18/57 (31.5%) cases and non-helpful in 17/57 (30%) cases. In 34/64 (53.1%) cases, all ancillary techniques (cell blocks, ICC and EM) were applied and their diagnostic accuracy was compared. Conclusions: With appropriate case selection, ancillary studies performed on aspirated material can provide useful information in FNAC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-110
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cytology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Immunohistochemistry
Cell Biology
Electron Microscopy
Microscopy
Light
Gold
Neoplasms
Staining and Labeling

Keywords

  • Cell blocks
  • electron microscopy
  • fine-needle aspiration cytology
  • immunocytochemistry
  • poorly differentiated tumors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Histology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Mutreja, D., Nijhawan, V. S., Srinivasa, V., Lakhtakia, R., & Subramanya, H. (2012). Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: Our experience. Journal of Cytology, 29(2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.97148

Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens : Our experience. / Mutreja, D.; Nijhawan, Vijay S.; Srinivasa, V.; Lakhtakia, R.; Subramanya, H.

In: Journal of Cytology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 103-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mutreja, D, Nijhawan, VS, Srinivasa, V, Lakhtakia, R & Subramanya, H 2012, 'Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: Our experience', Journal of Cytology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 103-110. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.97148
Mutreja, D. ; Nijhawan, Vijay S. ; Srinivasa, V. ; Lakhtakia, R. ; Subramanya, H. / Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens : Our experience. In: Journal of Cytology. 2012 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 103-110.
@article{8a9c6da1142e416480b2f87f5800e9bd,
title = "Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: Our experience",
abstract = "Background: The cytological diagnosis of poorly differentiated tumors is challenging because the tumor cells may have morphologically difficult presentations in materials obtained by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). With the application of FNAC in primary diagnosis of malignant lesions, there has been a significant increase in the use of ancillary studies in the aspirated material. Aims: We evaluated the value of ancillary studies, namely cell blocks, immunocytochemistry (ICC) and electron microscopy (EM), in the final interpretation of FNAC smears. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cases of neoplastic swellings were subjected to FNAC. Material acquired was divided for ICC, consisting of immunoperoxidase staining of direct smears, and/or cellblocks and EM, in addition to routine light microscopy (LM). Correlation with the available histological material with immunohistochemistry and/or pertinent clinical information was used as a {"}gold{"} standard. Results: Five (7.2{\%}) cases were excluded from the study, the material being necrotic or insufficient. Cell blocks were available in 46/64 (71.8{\%}) cases, ICC evaluation was performed in 41/64 cases (64{\%}) and EM studies were done in 57/64 cases (89{\%}). Diagnostic accuracy of LM alone was 32/64 (50{\%}). Cell blocks improved the diagnoses in 8/46 (17{\%}) cases. The ICC data were diagnostic in 18/41 (43.9{\%}) cases, helpful in 8/41 (19.6{\%}) cases and non-helpful in 15/41 (36.5{\%}) cases. EM studies were diagnostic in 22/57 (38.5{\%}) cases, helpful in 18/57 (31.5{\%}) cases and non-helpful in 17/57 (30{\%}) cases. In 34/64 (53.1{\%}) cases, all ancillary techniques (cell blocks, ICC and EM) were applied and their diagnostic accuracy was compared. Conclusions: With appropriate case selection, ancillary studies performed on aspirated material can provide useful information in FNAC.",
keywords = "Cell blocks, electron microscopy, fine-needle aspiration cytology, immunocytochemistry, poorly differentiated tumors",
author = "D. Mutreja and Nijhawan, {Vijay S.} and V. Srinivasa and R. Lakhtakia and H. Subramanya",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.4103/0970-9371.97148",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "103--110",
journal = "Journal of Cytology",
issn = "0970-9371",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value of ancillary studies in the evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens

T2 - Our experience

AU - Mutreja, D.

AU - Nijhawan, Vijay S.

AU - Srinivasa, V.

AU - Lakhtakia, R.

AU - Subramanya, H.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Background: The cytological diagnosis of poorly differentiated tumors is challenging because the tumor cells may have morphologically difficult presentations in materials obtained by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). With the application of FNAC in primary diagnosis of malignant lesions, there has been a significant increase in the use of ancillary studies in the aspirated material. Aims: We evaluated the value of ancillary studies, namely cell blocks, immunocytochemistry (ICC) and electron microscopy (EM), in the final interpretation of FNAC smears. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cases of neoplastic swellings were subjected to FNAC. Material acquired was divided for ICC, consisting of immunoperoxidase staining of direct smears, and/or cellblocks and EM, in addition to routine light microscopy (LM). Correlation with the available histological material with immunohistochemistry and/or pertinent clinical information was used as a "gold" standard. Results: Five (7.2%) cases were excluded from the study, the material being necrotic or insufficient. Cell blocks were available in 46/64 (71.8%) cases, ICC evaluation was performed in 41/64 cases (64%) and EM studies were done in 57/64 cases (89%). Diagnostic accuracy of LM alone was 32/64 (50%). Cell blocks improved the diagnoses in 8/46 (17%) cases. The ICC data were diagnostic in 18/41 (43.9%) cases, helpful in 8/41 (19.6%) cases and non-helpful in 15/41 (36.5%) cases. EM studies were diagnostic in 22/57 (38.5%) cases, helpful in 18/57 (31.5%) cases and non-helpful in 17/57 (30%) cases. In 34/64 (53.1%) cases, all ancillary techniques (cell blocks, ICC and EM) were applied and their diagnostic accuracy was compared. Conclusions: With appropriate case selection, ancillary studies performed on aspirated material can provide useful information in FNAC.

AB - Background: The cytological diagnosis of poorly differentiated tumors is challenging because the tumor cells may have morphologically difficult presentations in materials obtained by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). With the application of FNAC in primary diagnosis of malignant lesions, there has been a significant increase in the use of ancillary studies in the aspirated material. Aims: We evaluated the value of ancillary studies, namely cell blocks, immunocytochemistry (ICC) and electron microscopy (EM), in the final interpretation of FNAC smears. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cases of neoplastic swellings were subjected to FNAC. Material acquired was divided for ICC, consisting of immunoperoxidase staining of direct smears, and/or cellblocks and EM, in addition to routine light microscopy (LM). Correlation with the available histological material with immunohistochemistry and/or pertinent clinical information was used as a "gold" standard. Results: Five (7.2%) cases were excluded from the study, the material being necrotic or insufficient. Cell blocks were available in 46/64 (71.8%) cases, ICC evaluation was performed in 41/64 cases (64%) and EM studies were done in 57/64 cases (89%). Diagnostic accuracy of LM alone was 32/64 (50%). Cell blocks improved the diagnoses in 8/46 (17%) cases. The ICC data were diagnostic in 18/41 (43.9%) cases, helpful in 8/41 (19.6%) cases and non-helpful in 15/41 (36.5%) cases. EM studies were diagnostic in 22/57 (38.5%) cases, helpful in 18/57 (31.5%) cases and non-helpful in 17/57 (30%) cases. In 34/64 (53.1%) cases, all ancillary techniques (cell blocks, ICC and EM) were applied and their diagnostic accuracy was compared. Conclusions: With appropriate case selection, ancillary studies performed on aspirated material can provide useful information in FNAC.

KW - Cell blocks

KW - electron microscopy

KW - fine-needle aspiration cytology

KW - immunocytochemistry

KW - poorly differentiated tumors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862573930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862573930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0970-9371.97148

DO - 10.4103/0970-9371.97148

M3 - Article

C2 - 22787289

AN - SCOPUS:84862573930

VL - 29

SP - 103

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Cytology

JF - Journal of Cytology

SN - 0970-9371

IS - 2

ER -