Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury

Michael O. Kelleher, Rashid K. Al-Abri, David V. Lenihan, Michael A. Glasby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. While pulsed electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, the effect of a static magnetic field on nerve repair is less clear. The aim of this study was to establish what effect an imposed exogenous static magnetic field has on peripheral nerve regeneration after transection and repair. Methods. Three groups of six adult sheep were used. The first group acted as normal controls. In the second group, the median nerve was divided and immediately repaired by entubulation within a "controlled-release" biodegradable glass tube. In the third group, small magnets were applied to the sides of the biodegradable glass tubes before the median nerve was repaired using these magnetic tubes. The sheep were allowed to recover and were reexamined 10 months later. The animals underwent comprehensive morphometric (cross-sectional morphometry and measurement of internodal lengths), electrophysiological (determinations of stimulated jitter, maximum conduction velocity, refractory period, and F waves), and isometric tension (isometric twitch and tetanic tension) assessments. Conclusions. Exogenously applied static electromagnetic fields do not enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)610-615
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume105
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Peripheral Nerve Injuries
Nerve Regeneration
Magnetic Fields
Peripheral Nerves
Median Nerve
Glass
Sheep
Electromagnetic Fields
Magnets
Electromagnetic Phenomena

Keywords

  • Electromagnetic field
  • Nerve regeneration
  • Sheep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury. / Kelleher, Michael O.; Al-Abri, Rashid K.; Lenihan, David V.; Glasby, Michael A.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 105, No. 4, 2006, p. 610-615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelleher, Michael O. ; Al-Abri, Rashid K. ; Lenihan, David V. ; Glasby, Michael A. / Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury. In: Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006 ; Vol. 105, No. 4. pp. 610-615.
@article{3abbbba1c8994e0cba07d14f856b5e88,
title = "Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury",
abstract = "Object. While pulsed electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, the effect of a static magnetic field on nerve repair is less clear. The aim of this study was to establish what effect an imposed exogenous static magnetic field has on peripheral nerve regeneration after transection and repair. Methods. Three groups of six adult sheep were used. The first group acted as normal controls. In the second group, the median nerve was divided and immediately repaired by entubulation within a {"}controlled-release{"} biodegradable glass tube. In the third group, small magnets were applied to the sides of the biodegradable glass tubes before the median nerve was repaired using these magnetic tubes. The sheep were allowed to recover and were reexamined 10 months later. The animals underwent comprehensive morphometric (cross-sectional morphometry and measurement of internodal lengths), electrophysiological (determinations of stimulated jitter, maximum conduction velocity, refractory period, and F waves), and isometric tension (isometric twitch and tetanic tension) assessments. Conclusions. Exogenously applied static electromagnetic fields do not enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.",
keywords = "Electromagnetic field, Nerve regeneration, Sheep",
author = "Kelleher, {Michael O.} and Al-Abri, {Rashid K.} and Lenihan, {David V.} and Glasby, {Michael A.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.3171/jns.2006.105.4.610",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "610--615",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury

AU - Kelleher, Michael O.

AU - Al-Abri, Rashid K.

AU - Lenihan, David V.

AU - Glasby, Michael A.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Object. While pulsed electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, the effect of a static magnetic field on nerve repair is less clear. The aim of this study was to establish what effect an imposed exogenous static magnetic field has on peripheral nerve regeneration after transection and repair. Methods. Three groups of six adult sheep were used. The first group acted as normal controls. In the second group, the median nerve was divided and immediately repaired by entubulation within a "controlled-release" biodegradable glass tube. In the third group, small magnets were applied to the sides of the biodegradable glass tubes before the median nerve was repaired using these magnetic tubes. The sheep were allowed to recover and were reexamined 10 months later. The animals underwent comprehensive morphometric (cross-sectional morphometry and measurement of internodal lengths), electrophysiological (determinations of stimulated jitter, maximum conduction velocity, refractory period, and F waves), and isometric tension (isometric twitch and tetanic tension) assessments. Conclusions. Exogenously applied static electromagnetic fields do not enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.

AB - Object. While pulsed electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, the effect of a static magnetic field on nerve repair is less clear. The aim of this study was to establish what effect an imposed exogenous static magnetic field has on peripheral nerve regeneration after transection and repair. Methods. Three groups of six adult sheep were used. The first group acted as normal controls. In the second group, the median nerve was divided and immediately repaired by entubulation within a "controlled-release" biodegradable glass tube. In the third group, small magnets were applied to the sides of the biodegradable glass tubes before the median nerve was repaired using these magnetic tubes. The sheep were allowed to recover and were reexamined 10 months later. The animals underwent comprehensive morphometric (cross-sectional morphometry and measurement of internodal lengths), electrophysiological (determinations of stimulated jitter, maximum conduction velocity, refractory period, and F waves), and isometric tension (isometric twitch and tetanic tension) assessments. Conclusions. Exogenously applied static electromagnetic fields do not enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.

KW - Electromagnetic field

KW - Nerve regeneration

KW - Sheep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749525002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749525002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/jns.2006.105.4.610

DO - 10.3171/jns.2006.105.4.610

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 610

EP - 615

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 4

ER -