Transfusion consent in Oman

Physicians’ perception at a tertiary care university hospital

Arwa Z. Al-Riyami, Ibrahim Al-Marshoodi, Fehmida Zia, Mohammed Al-Huneini, Abdul Hakim Al-Rawas, Sachin Jose, Shahina Daar, Murtadha Al-Khabori, Hilal Al-Sabti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Transfusion is a common intervention that mandates the discussion of benefits, risks, and alternatives to planned transfusions. In Oman, transfusion consent was first introduced at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in March 2014. We sought to evaluate our physicians’ opinions, attitudes, and perception of the transfusion consent process. Methods: Attending physicians of different specialties were invited to complete an anonymous survey on transfusion consent. Results: A total of 114 physicians responded to the survey. Transfusion benefits and risks were explained regularly by 91% and 87% of the surveyed physicians, respectively. On the other hand, alternatives were declared by only 38%. Discomfort with the consent process was admitted by 10% of the physicians. There was no statistically significant association between discomfort in obtaining the consent and the physician seniority (p = 0.801), nor their specialties (p = 0.623). The importance of the consent process was acknowledged by 80% of surveyed physicians, who supported its implementation in other hospitals. Conclusion: This survey reflects positive attitudes of the surveyed physicians on the importance of transfusion consent. However, actions are required to achieve physicians’ full ease with the process and to ensure that transfusion alternatives are discussed. We advocate implementation of transfusion consent in other hospitals in Oman.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-257
Number of pages5
JournalOman Medical Journal
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Oman
Tertiary Healthcare
Physicians

Keywords

  • Blood transfusion
  • Health plan implementation
  • Informed consent
  • Surveys and questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Transfusion consent in Oman : Physicians’ perception at a tertiary care university hospital. / Al-Riyami, Arwa Z.; Al-Marshoodi, Ibrahim; Zia, Fehmida; Al-Huneini, Mohammed; Al-Rawas, Abdul Hakim; Jose, Sachin; Daar, Shahina; Al-Khabori, Murtadha; Al-Sabti, Hilal.

In: Oman Medical Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 253-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Riyami, Arwa Z. ; Al-Marshoodi, Ibrahim ; Zia, Fehmida ; Al-Huneini, Mohammed ; Al-Rawas, Abdul Hakim ; Jose, Sachin ; Daar, Shahina ; Al-Khabori, Murtadha ; Al-Sabti, Hilal. / Transfusion consent in Oman : Physicians’ perception at a tertiary care university hospital. In: Oman Medical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 253-257.
@article{b197773e41d041c8b3fc263a97426778,
title = "Transfusion consent in Oman: Physicians’ perception at a tertiary care university hospital",
abstract = "Objectives: Transfusion is a common intervention that mandates the discussion of benefits, risks, and alternatives to planned transfusions. In Oman, transfusion consent was first introduced at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in March 2014. We sought to evaluate our physicians’ opinions, attitudes, and perception of the transfusion consent process. Methods: Attending physicians of different specialties were invited to complete an anonymous survey on transfusion consent. Results: A total of 114 physicians responded to the survey. Transfusion benefits and risks were explained regularly by 91{\%} and 87{\%} of the surveyed physicians, respectively. On the other hand, alternatives were declared by only 38{\%}. Discomfort with the consent process was admitted by 10{\%} of the physicians. There was no statistically significant association between discomfort in obtaining the consent and the physician seniority (p = 0.801), nor their specialties (p = 0.623). The importance of the consent process was acknowledged by 80{\%} of surveyed physicians, who supported its implementation in other hospitals. Conclusion: This survey reflects positive attitudes of the surveyed physicians on the importance of transfusion consent. However, actions are required to achieve physicians’ full ease with the process and to ensure that transfusion alternatives are discussed. We advocate implementation of transfusion consent in other hospitals in Oman.",
keywords = "Blood transfusion, Health plan implementation, Informed consent, Surveys and questionnaires",
author = "Al-Riyami, {Arwa Z.} and Ibrahim Al-Marshoodi and Fehmida Zia and Mohammed Al-Huneini and Al-Rawas, {Abdul Hakim} and Sachin Jose and Shahina Daar and Murtadha Al-Khabori and Hilal Al-Sabti",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5001/omj.2016.50",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "253--257",
journal = "Oman Medical Journal",
issn = "1999-768X",
publisher = "Oman Medical Specialty Board",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transfusion consent in Oman

T2 - Physicians’ perception at a tertiary care university hospital

AU - Al-Riyami, Arwa Z.

AU - Al-Marshoodi, Ibrahim

AU - Zia, Fehmida

AU - Al-Huneini, Mohammed

AU - Al-Rawas, Abdul Hakim

AU - Jose, Sachin

AU - Daar, Shahina

AU - Al-Khabori, Murtadha

AU - Al-Sabti, Hilal

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Objectives: Transfusion is a common intervention that mandates the discussion of benefits, risks, and alternatives to planned transfusions. In Oman, transfusion consent was first introduced at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in March 2014. We sought to evaluate our physicians’ opinions, attitudes, and perception of the transfusion consent process. Methods: Attending physicians of different specialties were invited to complete an anonymous survey on transfusion consent. Results: A total of 114 physicians responded to the survey. Transfusion benefits and risks were explained regularly by 91% and 87% of the surveyed physicians, respectively. On the other hand, alternatives were declared by only 38%. Discomfort with the consent process was admitted by 10% of the physicians. There was no statistically significant association between discomfort in obtaining the consent and the physician seniority (p = 0.801), nor their specialties (p = 0.623). The importance of the consent process was acknowledged by 80% of surveyed physicians, who supported its implementation in other hospitals. Conclusion: This survey reflects positive attitudes of the surveyed physicians on the importance of transfusion consent. However, actions are required to achieve physicians’ full ease with the process and to ensure that transfusion alternatives are discussed. We advocate implementation of transfusion consent in other hospitals in Oman.

AB - Objectives: Transfusion is a common intervention that mandates the discussion of benefits, risks, and alternatives to planned transfusions. In Oman, transfusion consent was first introduced at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in March 2014. We sought to evaluate our physicians’ opinions, attitudes, and perception of the transfusion consent process. Methods: Attending physicians of different specialties were invited to complete an anonymous survey on transfusion consent. Results: A total of 114 physicians responded to the survey. Transfusion benefits and risks were explained regularly by 91% and 87% of the surveyed physicians, respectively. On the other hand, alternatives were declared by only 38%. Discomfort with the consent process was admitted by 10% of the physicians. There was no statistically significant association between discomfort in obtaining the consent and the physician seniority (p = 0.801), nor their specialties (p = 0.623). The importance of the consent process was acknowledged by 80% of surveyed physicians, who supported its implementation in other hospitals. Conclusion: This survey reflects positive attitudes of the surveyed physicians on the importance of transfusion consent. However, actions are required to achieve physicians’ full ease with the process and to ensure that transfusion alternatives are discussed. We advocate implementation of transfusion consent in other hospitals in Oman.

KW - Blood transfusion

KW - Health plan implementation

KW - Informed consent

KW - Surveys and questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983077469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983077469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5001/omj.2016.50

DO - 10.5001/omj.2016.50

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 253

EP - 257

JO - Oman Medical Journal

JF - Oman Medical Journal

SN - 1999-768X

IS - 4

ER -