TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards better understanding and narrowing of the science–practice gap
T2 - A practitioner-centered approach to management knowledge creation
AU - Božič, Katerina
AU - Bachkirov, Alexandre Anatolievich
AU - Černe, Matej
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - The lack of mutual communication and collaboration between academic research and management practice, and the limited implementation of the research findings in strategic and tactical decision-making in practice settings, known as the science-practice ‘gap’, remains an essential issue in management research. We challenge the primary focus on academics for the possibilities of bridging the gap by arguing that the picture remains incomplete without a closer look at the positions, perceptions, and attitudes of practicing managers toward the joint production of relevant management knowledge. Based on the inductive, grounded theory approach, we conducted a qualitative study of 47 practicing managers with different organizational and functional responsibilities across various industry sectors. Although practitioners perceived practice-engaged research design and execution, relevant management research, and benefits from complementary knowledge as enablers of fruitful science-practice collaboration, our emerging findings revealed limited trust, limited cognition, coping strategies, and heuristic information processing to be important barriers for practitioners that hamper the collaboration process. Relying on the cognitive and information processing framework and theory of the conservation of resources, we aimed to explain the antecedent of (un)successful collaboration on the practitioners' side, thus extending our understanding of the scholarship of integration.
AB - The lack of mutual communication and collaboration between academic research and management practice, and the limited implementation of the research findings in strategic and tactical decision-making in practice settings, known as the science-practice ‘gap’, remains an essential issue in management research. We challenge the primary focus on academics for the possibilities of bridging the gap by arguing that the picture remains incomplete without a closer look at the positions, perceptions, and attitudes of practicing managers toward the joint production of relevant management knowledge. Based on the inductive, grounded theory approach, we conducted a qualitative study of 47 practicing managers with different organizational and functional responsibilities across various industry sectors. Although practitioners perceived practice-engaged research design and execution, relevant management research, and benefits from complementary knowledge as enablers of fruitful science-practice collaboration, our emerging findings revealed limited trust, limited cognition, coping strategies, and heuristic information processing to be important barriers for practitioners that hamper the collaboration process. Relying on the cognitive and information processing framework and theory of the conservation of resources, we aimed to explain the antecedent of (un)successful collaboration on the practitioners' side, thus extending our understanding of the scholarship of integration.
KW - Collaboration challenges
KW - Grounded theory
KW - Knowledge creation
KW - Practitioners' voice
KW - Rigor-relevance debate
KW - Science-practice gap
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114788117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114788117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114788117
SN - 0263-2373
VL - 40
SP - 632
EP - 644
JO - European Management Journal
JF - European Management Journal
IS - 4
ER -