Thermal and magnetic analyses of gas-insulated lines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the factors affecting current rating "ampacity" of buried three-phase, naturally cooled isolated-phase gas-insulated lines (GIL) with flat formation and finite-element simulation of double-circuit, three-phase GIL inside a tunnel to calculate the magnetic-flux and current densities. In the former analysis, the depth of GIL burial, interspacing of phases and soil thermal resistivity are investigated to show their impacts on the GIL ampacity. In the latter analysis, the effects of electrical and physical arrangements of GIL phases on the magnetic-flux density inside and outside the tunnel, and the current density in few installed liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipelines, which run in parallel to the GIL inside the tunnel, are also studied. In any GIL configuration, the magnetic field impact is always extremely low. Localized hot spots along the periphery of the GIL enclosure are found and corrosion can be accelerated due to temperature gradient. Moreover, there is a possibility of galvanic corrosion of the enclosures when they are bonded together and with the gallery steel reinforcement at very short length intervals. The simulation results also give the best location of the LNG pipelines or any cables to have the lowest electromagnetic induction. The configuration that has the best "magnetic behavior" is distant-placed arrangement (DPA) with (abc-cba) phase arrangement. The induced eddy-current density in the LNG pipelines is very low and hence its thermal effects can be neglected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1255-1262
Number of pages8
JournalElectric Power Systems Research
Volume79
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Gases
Natural gas pipelines
Liquefied natural gas
Tunnels
Current density
Magnetic flux
Enclosures
Corrosion
Electromagnetic induction
Hot Temperature
Eddy currents
Thermal effects
Thermal gradients
Thermal conductivity
Reinforcement
Cables
Magnetic fields
Soils
Steel
Networks (circuits)

Keywords

  • Corrosion
  • Double circuit
  • Finite-element method
  • Gas-insulated lines
  • LNG pipelines
  • Magnetic analysis
  • Thermal analysis
  • Thermal resistance
  • Tunnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Thermal and magnetic analyses of gas-insulated lines. / Metwally, I. A.

In: Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 1255-1262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e2f2c2b093542bca177ebaa7ea45a9a,
title = "Thermal and magnetic analyses of gas-insulated lines",
abstract = "This paper presents the factors affecting current rating {"}ampacity{"} of buried three-phase, naturally cooled isolated-phase gas-insulated lines (GIL) with flat formation and finite-element simulation of double-circuit, three-phase GIL inside a tunnel to calculate the magnetic-flux and current densities. In the former analysis, the depth of GIL burial, interspacing of phases and soil thermal resistivity are investigated to show their impacts on the GIL ampacity. In the latter analysis, the effects of electrical and physical arrangements of GIL phases on the magnetic-flux density inside and outside the tunnel, and the current density in few installed liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipelines, which run in parallel to the GIL inside the tunnel, are also studied. In any GIL configuration, the magnetic field impact is always extremely low. Localized hot spots along the periphery of the GIL enclosure are found and corrosion can be accelerated due to temperature gradient. Moreover, there is a possibility of galvanic corrosion of the enclosures when they are bonded together and with the gallery steel reinforcement at very short length intervals. The simulation results also give the best location of the LNG pipelines or any cables to have the lowest electromagnetic induction. The configuration that has the best {"}magnetic behavior{"} is distant-placed arrangement (DPA) with (abc-cba) phase arrangement. The induced eddy-current density in the LNG pipelines is very low and hence its thermal effects can be neglected.",
keywords = "Corrosion, Double circuit, Finite-element method, Gas-insulated lines, LNG pipelines, Magnetic analysis, Thermal analysis, Thermal resistance, Tunnel",
author = "Metwally, {I. A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.epsr.2009.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1255--1262",
journal = "Electric Power Systems Research",
issn = "0378-7796",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermal and magnetic analyses of gas-insulated lines

AU - Metwally, I. A.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - This paper presents the factors affecting current rating "ampacity" of buried three-phase, naturally cooled isolated-phase gas-insulated lines (GIL) with flat formation and finite-element simulation of double-circuit, three-phase GIL inside a tunnel to calculate the magnetic-flux and current densities. In the former analysis, the depth of GIL burial, interspacing of phases and soil thermal resistivity are investigated to show their impacts on the GIL ampacity. In the latter analysis, the effects of electrical and physical arrangements of GIL phases on the magnetic-flux density inside and outside the tunnel, and the current density in few installed liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipelines, which run in parallel to the GIL inside the tunnel, are also studied. In any GIL configuration, the magnetic field impact is always extremely low. Localized hot spots along the periphery of the GIL enclosure are found and corrosion can be accelerated due to temperature gradient. Moreover, there is a possibility of galvanic corrosion of the enclosures when they are bonded together and with the gallery steel reinforcement at very short length intervals. The simulation results also give the best location of the LNG pipelines or any cables to have the lowest electromagnetic induction. The configuration that has the best "magnetic behavior" is distant-placed arrangement (DPA) with (abc-cba) phase arrangement. The induced eddy-current density in the LNG pipelines is very low and hence its thermal effects can be neglected.

AB - This paper presents the factors affecting current rating "ampacity" of buried three-phase, naturally cooled isolated-phase gas-insulated lines (GIL) with flat formation and finite-element simulation of double-circuit, three-phase GIL inside a tunnel to calculate the magnetic-flux and current densities. In the former analysis, the depth of GIL burial, interspacing of phases and soil thermal resistivity are investigated to show their impacts on the GIL ampacity. In the latter analysis, the effects of electrical and physical arrangements of GIL phases on the magnetic-flux density inside and outside the tunnel, and the current density in few installed liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipelines, which run in parallel to the GIL inside the tunnel, are also studied. In any GIL configuration, the magnetic field impact is always extremely low. Localized hot spots along the periphery of the GIL enclosure are found and corrosion can be accelerated due to temperature gradient. Moreover, there is a possibility of galvanic corrosion of the enclosures when they are bonded together and with the gallery steel reinforcement at very short length intervals. The simulation results also give the best location of the LNG pipelines or any cables to have the lowest electromagnetic induction. The configuration that has the best "magnetic behavior" is distant-placed arrangement (DPA) with (abc-cba) phase arrangement. The induced eddy-current density in the LNG pipelines is very low and hence its thermal effects can be neglected.

KW - Corrosion

KW - Double circuit

KW - Finite-element method

KW - Gas-insulated lines

KW - LNG pipelines

KW - Magnetic analysis

KW - Thermal analysis

KW - Thermal resistance

KW - Tunnel

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349185016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349185016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1255

EP - 1262

JO - Electric Power Systems Research

JF - Electric Power Systems Research

SN - 0378-7796

IS - 8

ER -