The use of brackish and oil-contaminated water in road construction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of non-freshwater, including brackish groundwater and oily production water, in road construction. Non-freshwater was obtained from four major oil production fields in Oman. First, chemical analyses were carried out on nine non-freshwater types, including tap water, obtained from the four sites. These water types were then used with well-graded sand (WGS), high-plasticity silt (HPS), and a road base material to evaluate water effect on material properties. Atterberg limits, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), swell percentage, swell pressure, and direct shear tests were performed. Results show that there is a slight decrease in the liquid limit when non-freshwater is used. Non-freshwater resulted in a slight decrease in optimum moisture content and a slight increase in maximum dry density in WGS, whereas with HPS it caused slight decreases in optimum moisture content and maximum dry density values. There was an increase in CBR when non-freshwater was used with WGS and HPS soils. However, the use of production water caused a decrease in CBR values for WGS. For the road base material, the use of non-freshwater generally caused a decrease in CBR. The swell pressure tends to increase when non-freshwater is used with HPS. For the road base material, there is a decrease in cohesion and an increase in friction angle when non-freshwater is used in lieu of tap water. Promising laboratory results indicate the potential use of brackish and oily water types in road construction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-169
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental and Engineering Geoscience
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Road construction
road construction
Bearings (structural)
Silt
oil
Plasticity
plasticity
silt
Sand
swell
Water
sand
dry density
water
road
moisture content
Moisture
Atterberg limit
liquid limit
shear test

Keywords

  • Atterberg limits
  • Brackish water
  • California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
  • Compaction
  • Oily water
  • Road construction
  • Shear strength
  • Soils
  • Swelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{99c2cd602b0c490085ac12fa33413ac9,
title = "The use of brackish and oil-contaminated water in road construction",
abstract = "This paper discusses the use of non-freshwater, including brackish groundwater and oily production water, in road construction. Non-freshwater was obtained from four major oil production fields in Oman. First, chemical analyses were carried out on nine non-freshwater types, including tap water, obtained from the four sites. These water types were then used with well-graded sand (WGS), high-plasticity silt (HPS), and a road base material to evaluate water effect on material properties. Atterberg limits, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), swell percentage, swell pressure, and direct shear tests were performed. Results show that there is a slight decrease in the liquid limit when non-freshwater is used. Non-freshwater resulted in a slight decrease in optimum moisture content and a slight increase in maximum dry density in WGS, whereas with HPS it caused slight decreases in optimum moisture content and maximum dry density values. There was an increase in CBR when non-freshwater was used with WGS and HPS soils. However, the use of production water caused a decrease in CBR values for WGS. For the road base material, the use of non-freshwater generally caused a decrease in CBR. The swell pressure tends to increase when non-freshwater is used with HPS. For the road base material, there is a decrease in cohesion and an increase in friction angle when non-freshwater is used in lieu of tap water. Promising laboratory results indicate the potential use of brackish and oily water types in road construction.",
keywords = "Atterberg limits, Brackish water, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Compaction, Oily water, Road construction, Shear strength, Soils, Swelling",
author = "Ramzi Taha and Amer Al-Rawas and Salim Al-Oraimi and Hossam Hassan and Mohammed Al-Aghbari",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2113/11.2.163",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "163--169",
journal = "Environmental and Engineering Geoscience",
issn = "1078-7275",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of brackish and oil-contaminated water in road construction

AU - Taha, Ramzi

AU - Al-Rawas, Amer

AU - Al-Oraimi, Salim

AU - Hassan, Hossam

AU - Al-Aghbari, Mohammed

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - This paper discusses the use of non-freshwater, including brackish groundwater and oily production water, in road construction. Non-freshwater was obtained from four major oil production fields in Oman. First, chemical analyses were carried out on nine non-freshwater types, including tap water, obtained from the four sites. These water types were then used with well-graded sand (WGS), high-plasticity silt (HPS), and a road base material to evaluate water effect on material properties. Atterberg limits, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), swell percentage, swell pressure, and direct shear tests were performed. Results show that there is a slight decrease in the liquid limit when non-freshwater is used. Non-freshwater resulted in a slight decrease in optimum moisture content and a slight increase in maximum dry density in WGS, whereas with HPS it caused slight decreases in optimum moisture content and maximum dry density values. There was an increase in CBR when non-freshwater was used with WGS and HPS soils. However, the use of production water caused a decrease in CBR values for WGS. For the road base material, the use of non-freshwater generally caused a decrease in CBR. The swell pressure tends to increase when non-freshwater is used with HPS. For the road base material, there is a decrease in cohesion and an increase in friction angle when non-freshwater is used in lieu of tap water. Promising laboratory results indicate the potential use of brackish and oily water types in road construction.

AB - This paper discusses the use of non-freshwater, including brackish groundwater and oily production water, in road construction. Non-freshwater was obtained from four major oil production fields in Oman. First, chemical analyses were carried out on nine non-freshwater types, including tap water, obtained from the four sites. These water types were then used with well-graded sand (WGS), high-plasticity silt (HPS), and a road base material to evaluate water effect on material properties. Atterberg limits, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), swell percentage, swell pressure, and direct shear tests were performed. Results show that there is a slight decrease in the liquid limit when non-freshwater is used. Non-freshwater resulted in a slight decrease in optimum moisture content and a slight increase in maximum dry density in WGS, whereas with HPS it caused slight decreases in optimum moisture content and maximum dry density values. There was an increase in CBR when non-freshwater was used with WGS and HPS soils. However, the use of production water caused a decrease in CBR values for WGS. For the road base material, the use of non-freshwater generally caused a decrease in CBR. The swell pressure tends to increase when non-freshwater is used with HPS. For the road base material, there is a decrease in cohesion and an increase in friction angle when non-freshwater is used in lieu of tap water. Promising laboratory results indicate the potential use of brackish and oily water types in road construction.

KW - Atterberg limits

KW - Brackish water

KW - California Bearing Ratio (CBR)

KW - Compaction

KW - Oily water

KW - Road construction

KW - Shear strength

KW - Soils

KW - Swelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744597804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744597804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2113/11.2.163

DO - 10.2113/11.2.163

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27744597804

VL - 11

SP - 163

EP - 169

JO - Environmental and Engineering Geoscience

JF - Environmental and Engineering Geoscience

SN - 1078-7275

IS - 2

ER -