TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of different fertilization strategies on the grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum l.) under conventional and conservation tillage
AU - Macák, Milan
AU - Candráková, Eva
AU - Ðalović, Ivica
AU - Prasad, P. V.Vara
AU - Farooq, Muhammad
AU - Korczyk-Szabó, Joanna
AU - Kováčik, Peter
AU - Šimanský, Vladimír
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, project VEGA 1/0218/20 and VEGA 1/0530/18.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Weather, tillage, and fertilization are the major factors affecting the grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). However, the impact of tillage and fertilization on yield is not well understood. Therefore, this experiment was initiated in 1999. In this manuscript, we report the data recorded during the period of 2011–2015 to quantify the impacts on yield. Field peas were planted in seedbeds prepared through conventional tillage (CT)—moldboard ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; and minimum tillage (MT)—disking to the depth of 0.12 m. The crop received three fertilization treatments, including zero fertilization (control); nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) mineral fertilization treatment; and NPK mineral fertilization plus the incorporation of pre-crop biomass. Five years’ average data indicated the highest yield on fertilized treatments (2.85–2.98 t ha−1 vs. 2.66 t ha−1) regardless of the tillage. When comparing the yield of fertilized treatments, the yield under CT (2.98 t ha−1) was significantly higher than that of MT (2.85 t ha−1). However, on non-fertilized treatments (less fertile plots), a higher yield was recorded under MT (2.71 t ha−1) compared with CT (2.40 t ha−1). Overall, the results of this study suggest that fertilizer application together with incorporation of the above-ground biomass of the previous crop may help sustain pea grain yield.
AB - Weather, tillage, and fertilization are the major factors affecting the grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). However, the impact of tillage and fertilization on yield is not well understood. Therefore, this experiment was initiated in 1999. In this manuscript, we report the data recorded during the period of 2011–2015 to quantify the impacts on yield. Field peas were planted in seedbeds prepared through conventional tillage (CT)—moldboard ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; and minimum tillage (MT)—disking to the depth of 0.12 m. The crop received three fertilization treatments, including zero fertilization (control); nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) mineral fertilization treatment; and NPK mineral fertilization plus the incorporation of pre-crop biomass. Five years’ average data indicated the highest yield on fertilized treatments (2.85–2.98 t ha−1 vs. 2.66 t ha−1) regardless of the tillage. When comparing the yield of fertilized treatments, the yield under CT (2.98 t ha−1) was significantly higher than that of MT (2.85 t ha−1). However, on non-fertilized treatments (less fertile plots), a higher yield was recorded under MT (2.71 t ha−1) compared with CT (2.40 t ha−1). Overall, the results of this study suggest that fertilizer application together with incorporation of the above-ground biomass of the previous crop may help sustain pea grain yield.
KW - Conventional tillage
KW - Fertilization
KW - Field pea
KW - Minimum tillage
KW - Soil quality
KW - Yield
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101139616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101139616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/agronomy10111728
DO - 10.3390/agronomy10111728
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101139616
SN - 2073-4395
VL - 10
JO - Agronomy
JF - Agronomy
IS - 11
M1 - 1728
ER -