The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern

Nirosh Kuruppu, Peter Oyelere, Fawzi Laswad

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research questions whether bankruptcy is the best proxy for assessing going concern since filing for bankruptcy is not synonymous with the invalidity of the going concern assumption. Furthermore, in contrast to debtor-oriented countries such as the USA, liquidation is the most likely outcome of corporate insolvency in creditor-oriented countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand. This suggests that bankruptcy prediction models have limited use for assessing going concern in creditor-oriented countries. This study examines the efficacy of a corporate liquidation model and a benchmark bankruptcy prediction model for assessing company liquidation. It finds that the former is more accurate in predicting company liquidations in comparison with the latter. Most importantly, Type 1 errors for the liquidation prediction model are significantly lower than for the bankruptcy prediction model, which indicates its greater efficacy as an analytical tool for assessing going concern. The results also suggest that bankruptcy prediction models might not be appropriate for assessing going concern in countries where the insolvency code is creditor-oriented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-590
Number of pages14
JournalManagerial Auditing Journal
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2003

Fingerprint

Liquidation
Bankruptcy prediction
Efficacy
Prediction model
Going concern
Bankruptcy
Insolvency
Germany
Benchmark
New Zealand

Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Corporate finances
  • Going concern value
  • Insolvency
  • Liquidation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern. / Kuruppu, Nirosh; Oyelere, Peter; Laswad, Fawzi.

In: Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18, 01.08.2003, p. 577-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c6813d3687444e8cb252005ec33a270f,
title = "The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern",
abstract = "Recent research questions whether bankruptcy is the best proxy for assessing going concern since filing for bankruptcy is not synonymous with the invalidity of the going concern assumption. Furthermore, in contrast to debtor-oriented countries such as the USA, liquidation is the most likely outcome of corporate insolvency in creditor-oriented countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand. This suggests that bankruptcy prediction models have limited use for assessing going concern in creditor-oriented countries. This study examines the efficacy of a corporate liquidation model and a benchmark bankruptcy prediction model for assessing company liquidation. It finds that the former is more accurate in predicting company liquidations in comparison with the latter. Most importantly, Type 1 errors for the liquidation prediction model are significantly lower than for the bankruptcy prediction model, which indicates its greater efficacy as an analytical tool for assessing going concern. The results also suggest that bankruptcy prediction models might not be appropriate for assessing going concern in countries where the insolvency code is creditor-oriented.",
keywords = "Bankruptcy, Corporate finances, Going concern value, Insolvency, Liquidation",
author = "Nirosh Kuruppu and Peter Oyelere and Fawzi Laswad",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/02686900310482713",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "577--590",
journal = "Managerial Auditing Journal",
issn = "0268-6902",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern

AU - Kuruppu, Nirosh

AU - Oyelere, Peter

AU - Laswad, Fawzi

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Recent research questions whether bankruptcy is the best proxy for assessing going concern since filing for bankruptcy is not synonymous with the invalidity of the going concern assumption. Furthermore, in contrast to debtor-oriented countries such as the USA, liquidation is the most likely outcome of corporate insolvency in creditor-oriented countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand. This suggests that bankruptcy prediction models have limited use for assessing going concern in creditor-oriented countries. This study examines the efficacy of a corporate liquidation model and a benchmark bankruptcy prediction model for assessing company liquidation. It finds that the former is more accurate in predicting company liquidations in comparison with the latter. Most importantly, Type 1 errors for the liquidation prediction model are significantly lower than for the bankruptcy prediction model, which indicates its greater efficacy as an analytical tool for assessing going concern. The results also suggest that bankruptcy prediction models might not be appropriate for assessing going concern in countries where the insolvency code is creditor-oriented.

AB - Recent research questions whether bankruptcy is the best proxy for assessing going concern since filing for bankruptcy is not synonymous with the invalidity of the going concern assumption. Furthermore, in contrast to debtor-oriented countries such as the USA, liquidation is the most likely outcome of corporate insolvency in creditor-oriented countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand. This suggests that bankruptcy prediction models have limited use for assessing going concern in creditor-oriented countries. This study examines the efficacy of a corporate liquidation model and a benchmark bankruptcy prediction model for assessing company liquidation. It finds that the former is more accurate in predicting company liquidations in comparison with the latter. Most importantly, Type 1 errors for the liquidation prediction model are significantly lower than for the bankruptcy prediction model, which indicates its greater efficacy as an analytical tool for assessing going concern. The results also suggest that bankruptcy prediction models might not be appropriate for assessing going concern in countries where the insolvency code is creditor-oriented.

KW - Bankruptcy

KW - Corporate finances

KW - Going concern value

KW - Insolvency

KW - Liquidation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986136023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986136023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/02686900310482713

DO - 10.1108/02686900310482713

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84986136023

VL - 18

SP - 577

EP - 590

JO - Managerial Auditing Journal

JF - Managerial Auditing Journal

SN - 0268-6902

ER -