The effect of pressure gauge placement on well testing analysis accuracy

P. Pourafshary, A. L. Podio, K. Sepehrnoori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The main assumption in well test analysis is that the pressure at the perforation zone is known, although transient pressure data may often be recorded at points above the perforation zone in the wellbore. Conversion of recorded data to bottomhole pressure can be affected by wellbore-related phenomena. In this article we develop a nonisothermal transient multiphase wellbore simulator, coupled to a compositional reservoir simulator, to model fluid flow and pressure during well testing. We show that neglecting multiphase flow effects in wellbores for the calculation of bottomhole pressure may make well test results unreliable. We also develop a method to use our simulator to calculate bottomhole pressure from measured pressure data when gauges are placed far from the perforations due to downhole restrictions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-642
Number of pages18
JournalPetroleum Science and Technology
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Well testing
Pressure gages
well testing
gauge
perforation
simulator
Simulators
well
multiphase flow
fluid pressure
Multiphase flow
fluid flow
effect
analysis
Gages
Flow of fluids

Keywords

  • Gauge placement
  • Well testing
  • Wellbore simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Fuel Technology
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

The effect of pressure gauge placement on well testing analysis accuracy. / Pourafshary, P.; Podio, A. L.; Sepehrnoori, K.

In: Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 6, 04.2009, p. 625-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b57b5304f27d4dea98b52182c8e5c2b2,
title = "The effect of pressure gauge placement on well testing analysis accuracy",
abstract = "The main assumption in well test analysis is that the pressure at the perforation zone is known, although transient pressure data may often be recorded at points above the perforation zone in the wellbore. Conversion of recorded data to bottomhole pressure can be affected by wellbore-related phenomena. In this article we develop a nonisothermal transient multiphase wellbore simulator, coupled to a compositional reservoir simulator, to model fluid flow and pressure during well testing. We show that neglecting multiphase flow effects in wellbores for the calculation of bottomhole pressure may make well test results unreliable. We also develop a method to use our simulator to calculate bottomhole pressure from measured pressure data when gauges are placed far from the perforations due to downhole restrictions.",
keywords = "Gauge placement, Well testing, Wellbore simulation",
author = "P. Pourafshary and Podio, {A. L.} and K. Sepehrnoori",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10916460701857748",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "625--642",
journal = "Petroleum Science and Technology",
issn = "1091-6466",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of pressure gauge placement on well testing analysis accuracy

AU - Pourafshary, P.

AU - Podio, A. L.

AU - Sepehrnoori, K.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The main assumption in well test analysis is that the pressure at the perforation zone is known, although transient pressure data may often be recorded at points above the perforation zone in the wellbore. Conversion of recorded data to bottomhole pressure can be affected by wellbore-related phenomena. In this article we develop a nonisothermal transient multiphase wellbore simulator, coupled to a compositional reservoir simulator, to model fluid flow and pressure during well testing. We show that neglecting multiphase flow effects in wellbores for the calculation of bottomhole pressure may make well test results unreliable. We also develop a method to use our simulator to calculate bottomhole pressure from measured pressure data when gauges are placed far from the perforations due to downhole restrictions.

AB - The main assumption in well test analysis is that the pressure at the perforation zone is known, although transient pressure data may often be recorded at points above the perforation zone in the wellbore. Conversion of recorded data to bottomhole pressure can be affected by wellbore-related phenomena. In this article we develop a nonisothermal transient multiphase wellbore simulator, coupled to a compositional reservoir simulator, to model fluid flow and pressure during well testing. We show that neglecting multiphase flow effects in wellbores for the calculation of bottomhole pressure may make well test results unreliable. We also develop a method to use our simulator to calculate bottomhole pressure from measured pressure data when gauges are placed far from the perforations due to downhole restrictions.

KW - Gauge placement

KW - Well testing

KW - Wellbore simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68149172464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68149172464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10916460701857748

DO - 10.1080/10916460701857748

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 625

EP - 642

JO - Petroleum Science and Technology

JF - Petroleum Science and Technology

SN - 1091-6466

IS - 6

ER -