The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study

Ali S. Al-Bemani, Boyun Guo, Ali Ghalambor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reservoir engineers are frequently faced with a very difficult question, thought to be a simple one, when attempting to analyze pressure transient test data. Correct model identification that can be used to analyze test data is ought to be a very simple exercise due to numerous analytical models, which are published in the literature. However, dealing with almost a black box situation "Underground Reservoir," it is still difficult today to identify a reservoir model that represents a particular test. In fact, the pressure derivative technique in identifying flow regimes that pressure behavior undergoes during the well testing has introduced another dimension and is considered to be an important step in analyzing pressure transient tests. However, the non-uniqueness in model responses, which produces similar pressure derivatives, hinders the engineers, and most often causes in taking a wrong decision. This study looks into non-unique model response, introduces a simplistic method using numerical simulator and any reservoir information available in eliminating non-realistic solutions. Analysis of actual well test data, to obtain the very basic properties, and integrating any other available data, one can build different model realizations. An actual model was build by history matching the pressure derivative that helped reducing the problem of non-uniqueness response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-899
Number of pages21
JournalPetroleum Science and Technology
Volume21
Issue number5-6
Publication statusPublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Identification (control systems)
well
Derivatives
Underground reservoirs
Well testing
Engineers
well testing
test
analysis
Analytical models
Numerical methods
numerical method
Simulators
simulator
history

Keywords

  • Aquifer
  • Composite system
  • Dual permeability
  • Dual porosity
  • Identification
  • Interporosity
  • Multiple realizations
  • Partial sealing
  • Pressure derivative
  • Reservoir modeling
  • Transient
  • Well testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Fuel Technology
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study. / Al-Bemani, Ali S.; Guo, Boyun; Ghalambor, Ali.

In: Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 5-6, 05.2003, p. 879-899.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{572b5934a22f4c2d9e58f2137f17d265,
title = "The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study",
abstract = "Reservoir engineers are frequently faced with a very difficult question, thought to be a simple one, when attempting to analyze pressure transient test data. Correct model identification that can be used to analyze test data is ought to be a very simple exercise due to numerous analytical models, which are published in the literature. However, dealing with almost a black box situation {"}Underground Reservoir,{"} it is still difficult today to identify a reservoir model that represents a particular test. In fact, the pressure derivative technique in identifying flow regimes that pressure behavior undergoes during the well testing has introduced another dimension and is considered to be an important step in analyzing pressure transient tests. However, the non-uniqueness in model responses, which produces similar pressure derivatives, hinders the engineers, and most often causes in taking a wrong decision. This study looks into non-unique model response, introduces a simplistic method using numerical simulator and any reservoir information available in eliminating non-realistic solutions. Analysis of actual well test data, to obtain the very basic properties, and integrating any other available data, one can build different model realizations. An actual model was build by history matching the pressure derivative that helped reducing the problem of non-uniqueness response.",
keywords = "Aquifer, Composite system, Dual permeability, Dual porosity, Identification, Interporosity, Multiple realizations, Partial sealing, Pressure derivative, Reservoir modeling, Transient, Well testing",
author = "Al-Bemani, {Ali S.} and Boyun Guo and Ali Ghalambor",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "879--899",
journal = "Petroleum Science and Technology",
issn = "1091-6466",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study

AU - Al-Bemani, Ali S.

AU - Guo, Boyun

AU - Ghalambor, Ali

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - Reservoir engineers are frequently faced with a very difficult question, thought to be a simple one, when attempting to analyze pressure transient test data. Correct model identification that can be used to analyze test data is ought to be a very simple exercise due to numerous analytical models, which are published in the literature. However, dealing with almost a black box situation "Underground Reservoir," it is still difficult today to identify a reservoir model that represents a particular test. In fact, the pressure derivative technique in identifying flow regimes that pressure behavior undergoes during the well testing has introduced another dimension and is considered to be an important step in analyzing pressure transient tests. However, the non-uniqueness in model responses, which produces similar pressure derivatives, hinders the engineers, and most often causes in taking a wrong decision. This study looks into non-unique model response, introduces a simplistic method using numerical simulator and any reservoir information available in eliminating non-realistic solutions. Analysis of actual well test data, to obtain the very basic properties, and integrating any other available data, one can build different model realizations. An actual model was build by history matching the pressure derivative that helped reducing the problem of non-uniqueness response.

AB - Reservoir engineers are frequently faced with a very difficult question, thought to be a simple one, when attempting to analyze pressure transient test data. Correct model identification that can be used to analyze test data is ought to be a very simple exercise due to numerous analytical models, which are published in the literature. However, dealing with almost a black box situation "Underground Reservoir," it is still difficult today to identify a reservoir model that represents a particular test. In fact, the pressure derivative technique in identifying flow regimes that pressure behavior undergoes during the well testing has introduced another dimension and is considered to be an important step in analyzing pressure transient tests. However, the non-uniqueness in model responses, which produces similar pressure derivatives, hinders the engineers, and most often causes in taking a wrong decision. This study looks into non-unique model response, introduces a simplistic method using numerical simulator and any reservoir information available in eliminating non-realistic solutions. Analysis of actual well test data, to obtain the very basic properties, and integrating any other available data, one can build different model realizations. An actual model was build by history matching the pressure derivative that helped reducing the problem of non-uniqueness response.

KW - Aquifer

KW - Composite system

KW - Dual permeability

KW - Dual porosity

KW - Identification

KW - Interporosity

KW - Multiple realizations

KW - Partial sealing

KW - Pressure derivative

KW - Reservoir modeling

KW - Transient

KW - Well testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038002894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038002894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 879

EP - 899

JO - Petroleum Science and Technology

JF - Petroleum Science and Technology

SN - 1091-6466

IS - 5-6

ER -