Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks

Jose Arreola Hernandez, Khamis Al Yahyaee, Shawkat Hammoudeh, Walid Mensi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper undertakes a rolling window comparative analysis of risks for portfolios consisting of GCC Islamic and conventional bank indices. We draw our empirical results by employing canonical, drawable and regular vine copula models, as well as by implementing a portfolio optimization method with a conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We find evidence of higher riskiness in the group of Islamic banks relative to the group of conventional banks across each of the financial rolling window scenarios under consideration. Specifically, a greater negative (nonlinear) tail asymmetric dependence is observed in the pairs of Islamic banks’ relationships. The results also show that the optimal portfolio model supports a clear preference towards the group of conventional banks in regard to risk minimization and diversification benefits.

Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Economics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Tail dependence
Risk diversification
Risk exposure
Islamic financial institutions
Bank relationships
Risk minimization
Empirical results
Portfolio optimization
Riskiness
Comparative analysis
Diversification benefits
Asymmetric dependence
Portfolio model
Optimal portfolio
Conditional value at risk
Copula
Scenarios

Keywords

  • conditional Value-at-Risk
  • Islamic and conventional banks
  • nonlinear dependence risk
  • portfolio diversification
  • vine copulas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks. / Hernandez, Jose Arreola; Al Yahyaee, Khamis; Hammoudeh, Shawkat; Mensi, Walid.

In: Applied Economics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b562777fc9d45959a36141ab8f8959e,
title = "Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks",
abstract = "This paper undertakes a rolling window comparative analysis of risks for portfolios consisting of GCC Islamic and conventional bank indices. We draw our empirical results by employing canonical, drawable and regular vine copula models, as well as by implementing a portfolio optimization method with a conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We find evidence of higher riskiness in the group of Islamic banks relative to the group of conventional banks across each of the financial rolling window scenarios under consideration. Specifically, a greater negative (nonlinear) tail asymmetric dependence is observed in the pairs of Islamic banks’ relationships. The results also show that the optimal portfolio model supports a clear preference towards the group of conventional banks in regard to risk minimization and diversification benefits.",
keywords = "conditional Value-at-Risk, Islamic and conventional banks, nonlinear dependence risk, portfolio diversification, vine copulas",
author = "Hernandez, {Jose Arreola} and {Al Yahyaee}, Khamis and Shawkat Hammoudeh and Walid Mensi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00036846.2019.1602716",
language = "English",
journal = "Applied Economics",
issn = "0003-6846",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tail dependence risk exposure and diversification potential of Islamic and conventional banks

AU - Hernandez, Jose Arreola

AU - Al Yahyaee, Khamis

AU - Hammoudeh, Shawkat

AU - Mensi, Walid

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper undertakes a rolling window comparative analysis of risks for portfolios consisting of GCC Islamic and conventional bank indices. We draw our empirical results by employing canonical, drawable and regular vine copula models, as well as by implementing a portfolio optimization method with a conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We find evidence of higher riskiness in the group of Islamic banks relative to the group of conventional banks across each of the financial rolling window scenarios under consideration. Specifically, a greater negative (nonlinear) tail asymmetric dependence is observed in the pairs of Islamic banks’ relationships. The results also show that the optimal portfolio model supports a clear preference towards the group of conventional banks in regard to risk minimization and diversification benefits.

AB - This paper undertakes a rolling window comparative analysis of risks for portfolios consisting of GCC Islamic and conventional bank indices. We draw our empirical results by employing canonical, drawable and regular vine copula models, as well as by implementing a portfolio optimization method with a conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We find evidence of higher riskiness in the group of Islamic banks relative to the group of conventional banks across each of the financial rolling window scenarios under consideration. Specifically, a greater negative (nonlinear) tail asymmetric dependence is observed in the pairs of Islamic banks’ relationships. The results also show that the optimal portfolio model supports a clear preference towards the group of conventional banks in regard to risk minimization and diversification benefits.

KW - conditional Value-at-Risk

KW - Islamic and conventional banks

KW - nonlinear dependence risk

KW - portfolio diversification

KW - vine copulas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064516274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064516274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00036846.2019.1602716

DO - 10.1080/00036846.2019.1602716

M3 - Article

JO - Applied Economics

JF - Applied Economics

SN - 0003-6846

ER -