TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgeons’ interactions with and attitudes toward E-patients
T2 - Questionnaire study in Germany and Oman
AU - Masters, Ken
AU - Loda, Teresa
AU - Johannink, Jonas
AU - Al-Abri, Rashid
AU - Herrmann-Werner, Anne
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all the physicians who participated in this study. The authors also wish to thank reviewers of previous versions of this paper. This study had no external funding or sponsorships.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Background: Doctors’ interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients have an overall impact on health care delivery. Objective: This study aimed to gauge surgeons’ interactions with e-patients, their attitudes toward those e-patient activities, the possible impact on the delivery of health care, and the reasons behind those activities and attitudes. Methods: We created a paper-based and electronic survey form based on pertinent variables identified in the literature, and from March 2018 to July 2018 we surveyed 49 surgeons in Germany and 59 surgeons in Oman, asking them about their interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients. Data were stored in Microsoft Excel and SPSS, and descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and chi-square tests were performed on the data. Results: Of our sample, 71% (35/49) of the German surgeons and 56% (33/59) of the Omani surgeons communicated electronically with their patients. Although the German surgeons spent a greater percentage of Internet usage time on work-related activities (χ2 18=32.5; P=.02) than the Omani surgeons, there were many similarities in their activities. An outstanding difference was that the German surgeons used email with their patients more than the Omani surgeons (χ2 1=9.0; P=.003), and the Omani surgeons used social media, specifically WhatsApp, more than the German surgeons (χ2 1=18.6; P<.001). Overall, the surgeons were equally positive about the most common e-patient activities such as bringing material from the internet to the consultation (mean 4.11, SD 1.6), although the German surgeons (mean 3.43, SD 1.9) were more concerned (P=.001) than the Omani surgeons (mean 2.32, SD 1.3) about the potential loss of control and time consumption (German: mean 5.10, SD 1.4 and Omani: mean 3.92, SD 1.6; P<.001). Conclusions: The interactions show a high degree of engagement with e-patients. The differences between the German and the Omani surgeons in the preferred methods of communication are possibly closely linked to cultural differences and recent historical events. These differences may, moreover, indicate e-patients’ desired method of electronic communication to include social media. The low impact of surgeons’ attitudes on the activities may also result from a normalization of many e-patient activities, irrespective of the doctors’ attitudes and influences.
AB - Background: Doctors’ interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients have an overall impact on health care delivery. Objective: This study aimed to gauge surgeons’ interactions with e-patients, their attitudes toward those e-patient activities, the possible impact on the delivery of health care, and the reasons behind those activities and attitudes. Methods: We created a paper-based and electronic survey form based on pertinent variables identified in the literature, and from March 2018 to July 2018 we surveyed 49 surgeons in Germany and 59 surgeons in Oman, asking them about their interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients. Data were stored in Microsoft Excel and SPSS, and descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and chi-square tests were performed on the data. Results: Of our sample, 71% (35/49) of the German surgeons and 56% (33/59) of the Omani surgeons communicated electronically with their patients. Although the German surgeons spent a greater percentage of Internet usage time on work-related activities (χ2 18=32.5; P=.02) than the Omani surgeons, there were many similarities in their activities. An outstanding difference was that the German surgeons used email with their patients more than the Omani surgeons (χ2 1=9.0; P=.003), and the Omani surgeons used social media, specifically WhatsApp, more than the German surgeons (χ2 1=18.6; P<.001). Overall, the surgeons were equally positive about the most common e-patient activities such as bringing material from the internet to the consultation (mean 4.11, SD 1.6), although the German surgeons (mean 3.43, SD 1.9) were more concerned (P=.001) than the Omani surgeons (mean 2.32, SD 1.3) about the potential loss of control and time consumption (German: mean 5.10, SD 1.4 and Omani: mean 3.92, SD 1.6; P<.001). Conclusions: The interactions show a high degree of engagement with e-patients. The differences between the German and the Omani surgeons in the preferred methods of communication are possibly closely linked to cultural differences and recent historical events. These differences may, moreover, indicate e-patients’ desired method of electronic communication to include social media. The low impact of surgeons’ attitudes on the activities may also result from a normalization of many e-patient activities, irrespective of the doctors’ attitudes and influences.
KW - Attitude
KW - Communication
KW - Digital health
KW - Doctor-patient relationship
KW - E-patient
KW - E-physician
KW - Empowerment
KW - Internet
KW - Internet-informed patient
KW - Physician
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081594690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081594690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2196/14646
DO - 10.2196/14646
M3 - Article
C2 - 32149714
AN - SCOPUS:85081594690
SN - 1439-4456
VL - 22
JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research
JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research
IS - 3
M1 - e14646
ER -