Surfactant-modified native soil in the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water

Mohamed Aoudia, Mohamed Al-Moqbali, Ameera Al-Sawaei, Mahfoodh Al-Shaaili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the possibility to use surfactant-modified and unmodified native sand (Oman) for the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. Dodecyltrimethylammonium (DDTMA) bromide was used to modify the sand properties. In our approach, surfactant was added to the contaminated water and the resulting aqueous surfactant solution was forced to percolate through the column packed with native soil. Thus, in this approach, soil modification by the surfactant molecules occurs during the water treatment process. Rejections of the crude oil aromatic components were estimated using a new and simple approach based on the measured total fluorescence emission ratio AP/A0, where AP is the total fluorescence area of the permeate and A0 the total fluorescence area of the untreated water. Our results from the packed column with unmodified native sand showed substantial rejection of aromatic hydrocarbons (~ 85%) only for the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected. As the cumulative volume of permeate increases up to 1000 mL, the rejection decreases to less than 10%. When surfactant was added to the feed (contaminated Nimr water) at 10-4 M (below the surfactant CMC), complete rejection occurred only with the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected, followed by a decrease in the rejection to about 45% rejection as the cumulative permeate volume reached 1000 mL On the other hand, when e surfactant was added above its CMC (5×10-4 M and 1×10-3 M), all individual 100 mL (10 separate individual 100 ml samples) were practically free of aromatics (~100% rejection). Thus, complete rejections occurred only at and above the surfactant critical micelle concentration. This concentration-dependent rejection of the aromatics was associated to the concentration-dependence of the surfactant onto the substrate surface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-209
Number of pages7
JournalDesalination and Water Treatment
Volume29
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Oil fields
oil field
surfactant
Surface active agents
Soils
soil
water
fluorescence
Sand
Fluorescence
sand
Produced Water
Water
Critical micelle concentration
Aromatic hydrocarbons
aromatic hydrocarbon
Water treatment
bromide
crude oil
water treatment

Keywords

  • Adsorption
  • Aromatic components
  • References
  • Rejection
  • Surfactant
  • Surfactant-modsified soil

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering

Cite this

Surfactant-modified native soil in the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. / Aoudia, Mohamed; Al-Moqbali, Mohamed; Al-Sawaei, Ameera; Al-Shaaili, Mahfoodh.

In: Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 29, No. 1-3, 2011, p. 203-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aoudia, Mohamed ; Al-Moqbali, Mohamed ; Al-Sawaei, Ameera ; Al-Shaaili, Mahfoodh. / Surfactant-modified native soil in the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. In: Desalination and Water Treatment. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 1-3. pp. 203-209.
@article{c32ce6ec611a44b3838f838cda65de74,
title = "Surfactant-modified native soil in the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water",
abstract = "In this study, we investigated the possibility to use surfactant-modified and unmodified native sand (Oman) for the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. Dodecyltrimethylammonium (DDTMA) bromide was used to modify the sand properties. In our approach, surfactant was added to the contaminated water and the resulting aqueous surfactant solution was forced to percolate through the column packed with native soil. Thus, in this approach, soil modification by the surfactant molecules occurs during the water treatment process. Rejections of the crude oil aromatic components were estimated using a new and simple approach based on the measured total fluorescence emission ratio AP/A0, where AP is the total fluorescence area of the permeate and A0 the total fluorescence area of the untreated water. Our results from the packed column with unmodified native sand showed substantial rejection of aromatic hydrocarbons (~ 85{\%}) only for the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected. As the cumulative volume of permeate increases up to 1000 mL, the rejection decreases to less than 10{\%}. When surfactant was added to the feed (contaminated Nimr water) at 10-4 M (below the surfactant CMC), complete rejection occurred only with the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected, followed by a decrease in the rejection to about 45{\%} rejection as the cumulative permeate volume reached 1000 mL On the other hand, when e surfactant was added above its CMC (5×10-4 M and 1×10-3 M), all individual 100 mL (10 separate individual 100 ml samples) were practically free of aromatics (~100{\%} rejection). Thus, complete rejections occurred only at and above the surfactant critical micelle concentration. This concentration-dependent rejection of the aromatics was associated to the concentration-dependence of the surfactant onto the substrate surface.",
keywords = "Adsorption, Aromatic components, References, Rejection, Surfactant, Surfactant-modsified soil",
author = "Mohamed Aoudia and Mohamed Al-Moqbali and Ameera Al-Sawaei and Mahfoodh Al-Shaaili",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.5004/dwt.2011.1424",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "203--209",
journal = "Desalination and Water Treatment",
issn = "1944-3994",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surfactant-modified native soil in the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water

AU - Aoudia, Mohamed

AU - Al-Moqbali, Mohamed

AU - Al-Sawaei, Ameera

AU - Al-Shaaili, Mahfoodh

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this study, we investigated the possibility to use surfactant-modified and unmodified native sand (Oman) for the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. Dodecyltrimethylammonium (DDTMA) bromide was used to modify the sand properties. In our approach, surfactant was added to the contaminated water and the resulting aqueous surfactant solution was forced to percolate through the column packed with native soil. Thus, in this approach, soil modification by the surfactant molecules occurs during the water treatment process. Rejections of the crude oil aromatic components were estimated using a new and simple approach based on the measured total fluorescence emission ratio AP/A0, where AP is the total fluorescence area of the permeate and A0 the total fluorescence area of the untreated water. Our results from the packed column with unmodified native sand showed substantial rejection of aromatic hydrocarbons (~ 85%) only for the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected. As the cumulative volume of permeate increases up to 1000 mL, the rejection decreases to less than 10%. When surfactant was added to the feed (contaminated Nimr water) at 10-4 M (below the surfactant CMC), complete rejection occurred only with the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected, followed by a decrease in the rejection to about 45% rejection as the cumulative permeate volume reached 1000 mL On the other hand, when e surfactant was added above its CMC (5×10-4 M and 1×10-3 M), all individual 100 mL (10 separate individual 100 ml samples) were practically free of aromatics (~100% rejection). Thus, complete rejections occurred only at and above the surfactant critical micelle concentration. This concentration-dependent rejection of the aromatics was associated to the concentration-dependence of the surfactant onto the substrate surface.

AB - In this study, we investigated the possibility to use surfactant-modified and unmodified native sand (Oman) for the treatment of oil field (Nimr) produced water. Dodecyltrimethylammonium (DDTMA) bromide was used to modify the sand properties. In our approach, surfactant was added to the contaminated water and the resulting aqueous surfactant solution was forced to percolate through the column packed with native soil. Thus, in this approach, soil modification by the surfactant molecules occurs during the water treatment process. Rejections of the crude oil aromatic components were estimated using a new and simple approach based on the measured total fluorescence emission ratio AP/A0, where AP is the total fluorescence area of the permeate and A0 the total fluorescence area of the untreated water. Our results from the packed column with unmodified native sand showed substantial rejection of aromatic hydrocarbons (~ 85%) only for the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected. As the cumulative volume of permeate increases up to 1000 mL, the rejection decreases to less than 10%. When surfactant was added to the feed (contaminated Nimr water) at 10-4 M (below the surfactant CMC), complete rejection occurred only with the first individual 100 mL permeate sample collected, followed by a decrease in the rejection to about 45% rejection as the cumulative permeate volume reached 1000 mL On the other hand, when e surfactant was added above its CMC (5×10-4 M and 1×10-3 M), all individual 100 mL (10 separate individual 100 ml samples) were practically free of aromatics (~100% rejection). Thus, complete rejections occurred only at and above the surfactant critical micelle concentration. This concentration-dependent rejection of the aromatics was associated to the concentration-dependence of the surfactant onto the substrate surface.

KW - Adsorption

KW - Aromatic components

KW - References

KW - Rejection

KW - Surfactant

KW - Surfactant-modsified soil

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958724613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958724613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5004/dwt.2011.1424

DO - 10.5004/dwt.2011.1424

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958724613

VL - 29

SP - 203

EP - 209

JO - Desalination and Water Treatment

JF - Desalination and Water Treatment

SN - 1944-3994

IS - 1-3

ER -