Abstract
This paper investigates the licensing of subjects in Standard Arabic participial clauses. Unlike verbal clauses, whose subject may appear post-verbally, the subject of participial clauses must precede the participle, having properties of topics of verbal clauses. I claim that this is because the canonical subject position, [Spec, vP], is not available for subjects of participles, due to lack of Nom Case. It is shown that neither tense nor a copula is sufficient to license structural Nom Case on a subject in [Spec, vP]. I conclude that the licensing of Nom Case on post-verbal subjects is dependent on V-to-T raising; that is, Nom Case is licensed by the T-V complex. The present account has implications for the nature of pre-verbal subjects in Arabic as well as for the categorial status of copular elements like kāna.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 249-282 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 5 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Arabic
- Kāna
- Nom Case
- Participles
- V-to-T movement
- Verbal Case
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language