Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons: Comparison and application

Mohammed Farfour, Said Gaci

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Hydrocarbon-saturated hydrocarbon formations are proved to have their own characteristic frequency at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This is because of their unique solid and fluid properties discriminating them from their surroundings. This has provided great support to interpretation of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in different parts of the world. Likewise, early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that these geological formations have their own amplitude with which they respond to seismic excitation; these seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has provided supportive interpretation to strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in worldwide basins. In this study spectral decomposition approaches are used to decompose the spectra of seismic traces into individual frequencies; whereas, AVO equations are invoked to decompose seismic amplitude in stack sections into its constituent components recorded at different offsets. From the angle gathers or from intercept and gradient amplitude, sections are produced at different angles. Results demonstrated that decomposing amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help in the discrimination of different lithologies and fluid types. Furthermore, the decomposition showed that if the intercept and gradient are properly scaled, they can help predict amplitude responses at offsets where the data is not of good presence (very near offset) or poor quality (very-far offsets) or in case only angle-stacks are available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages144-147
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
EventSEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018 - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Duration: May 9 2018May 10 2018

Other

OtherSEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018
CountryUnited Arab Emirates
CityAbu Dhabi
Period5/9/185/10/18

Fingerprint

Hydrocarbons
decomposition
hydrocarbon
Decomposition
Lithology
Fluids
Seismic response
fluid
seismic data
lithology
comparison
seismic response
pore space
anomaly
basin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Fuel Technology

Cite this

Farfour, M., & Gaci, S. (2018). Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons: Comparison and application. 144-147. Paper presented at SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. https://doi.org/10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1

Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons : Comparison and application. / Farfour, Mohammed; Gaci, Said.

2018. 144-147 Paper presented at SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Farfour, M & Gaci, S 2018, 'Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons: Comparison and application' Paper presented at SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 5/9/18 - 5/10/18, pp. 144-147. https://doi.org/10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1
Farfour M, Gaci S. Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons: Comparison and application. 2018. Paper presented at SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. https://doi.org/10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1
Farfour, Mohammed ; Gaci, Said. / Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons : Comparison and application. Paper presented at SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.4 p.
@conference{4247c607b6fd4281b01bb5670dc28743,
title = "Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons: Comparison and application",
abstract = "Hydrocarbon-saturated hydrocarbon formations are proved to have their own characteristic frequency at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This is because of their unique solid and fluid properties discriminating them from their surroundings. This has provided great support to interpretation of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in different parts of the world. Likewise, early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that these geological formations have their own amplitude with which they respond to seismic excitation; these seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has provided supportive interpretation to strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in worldwide basins. In this study spectral decomposition approaches are used to decompose the spectra of seismic traces into individual frequencies; whereas, AVO equations are invoked to decompose seismic amplitude in stack sections into its constituent components recorded at different offsets. From the angle gathers or from intercept and gradient amplitude, sections are produced at different angles. Results demonstrated that decomposing amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help in the discrimination of different lithologies and fluid types. Furthermore, the decomposition showed that if the intercept and gradient are properly scaled, they can help predict amplitude responses at offsets where the data is not of good presence (very near offset) or poor quality (very-far offsets) or in case only angle-stacks are available.",
author = "Mohammed Farfour and Said Gaci",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1",
language = "English",
pages = "144--147",
note = "SEG/AAPG/EAGE/SPE Research and Development Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2018, RDP 2018 ; Conference date: 09-05-2018 Through 10-05-2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to detect hydrocarbons

T2 - Comparison and application

AU - Farfour, Mohammed

AU - Gaci, Said

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Hydrocarbon-saturated hydrocarbon formations are proved to have their own characteristic frequency at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This is because of their unique solid and fluid properties discriminating them from their surroundings. This has provided great support to interpretation of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in different parts of the world. Likewise, early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that these geological formations have their own amplitude with which they respond to seismic excitation; these seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has provided supportive interpretation to strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in worldwide basins. In this study spectral decomposition approaches are used to decompose the spectra of seismic traces into individual frequencies; whereas, AVO equations are invoked to decompose seismic amplitude in stack sections into its constituent components recorded at different offsets. From the angle gathers or from intercept and gradient amplitude, sections are produced at different angles. Results demonstrated that decomposing amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help in the discrimination of different lithologies and fluid types. Furthermore, the decomposition showed that if the intercept and gradient are properly scaled, they can help predict amplitude responses at offsets where the data is not of good presence (very near offset) or poor quality (very-far offsets) or in case only angle-stacks are available.

AB - Hydrocarbon-saturated hydrocarbon formations are proved to have their own characteristic frequency at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This is because of their unique solid and fluid properties discriminating them from their surroundings. This has provided great support to interpretation of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in different parts of the world. Likewise, early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that these geological formations have their own amplitude with which they respond to seismic excitation; these seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has provided supportive interpretation to strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in worldwide basins. In this study spectral decomposition approaches are used to decompose the spectra of seismic traces into individual frequencies; whereas, AVO equations are invoked to decompose seismic amplitude in stack sections into its constituent components recorded at different offsets. From the angle gathers or from intercept and gradient amplitude, sections are produced at different angles. Results demonstrated that decomposing amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help in the discrimination of different lithologies and fluid types. Furthermore, the decomposition showed that if the intercept and gradient are properly scaled, they can help predict amplitude responses at offsets where the data is not of good presence (very near offset) or poor quality (very-far offsets) or in case only angle-stacks are available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053689616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053689616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1

DO - 10.1190/RDP2018-40021380.1

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85053689616

SP - 144

EP - 147

ER -