Social facilitation of drinking of a partially satiated duckling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Water-deprived and nondeprived ducklings were reintroduced to a flock companion which had been allowed to partially satiate itself after 3 h of water deprivation. The drinking and sieving behavior of the partially satiated "reactor" bird was immediately increased above that of similar birds left on their own. However, whether or not the introduced "actor" ducklings were deprived had no consequences for the drinking response of the reactor above that obtained by their introduction. The number of companions introduced also failed to have any effect other than that obtained by their introduction. The increase in sieving was greater when deprived, rather than nondeprived, actors were introduced. These results were discussed in relation to the motivational aspects of sieving behavior and the mechanism of social facilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-395
Number of pages5
JournalAnimal Learning & Behavior
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1976

Fingerprint

Social Facilitation
social facilitation
ducklings
sieving
drinking
Drinking
Birds
Water Deprivation
Drinking Behavior
water deprivation
birds
Water
flocks
water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Social facilitation of drinking of a partially satiated duckling. / Clayton, David A.

In: Animal Learning & Behavior, Vol. 4, No. 4, 12.1976, p. 391-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1191e7f4d0340168b0c1e364596a66d,
title = "Social facilitation of drinking of a partially satiated duckling",
abstract = "Water-deprived and nondeprived ducklings were reintroduced to a flock companion which had been allowed to partially satiate itself after 3 h of water deprivation. The drinking and sieving behavior of the partially satiated {"}reactor{"} bird was immediately increased above that of similar birds left on their own. However, whether or not the introduced {"}actor{"} ducklings were deprived had no consequences for the drinking response of the reactor above that obtained by their introduction. The number of companions introduced also failed to have any effect other than that obtained by their introduction. The increase in sieving was greater when deprived, rather than nondeprived, actors were introduced. These results were discussed in relation to the motivational aspects of sieving behavior and the mechanism of social facilitation.",
author = "Clayton, {David A.}",
year = "1976",
month = "12",
doi = "10.3758/BF03214427",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "391--395",
journal = "Animal Learning and Behavior",
issn = "0090-4996",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social facilitation of drinking of a partially satiated duckling

AU - Clayton, David A.

PY - 1976/12

Y1 - 1976/12

N2 - Water-deprived and nondeprived ducklings were reintroduced to a flock companion which had been allowed to partially satiate itself after 3 h of water deprivation. The drinking and sieving behavior of the partially satiated "reactor" bird was immediately increased above that of similar birds left on their own. However, whether or not the introduced "actor" ducklings were deprived had no consequences for the drinking response of the reactor above that obtained by their introduction. The number of companions introduced also failed to have any effect other than that obtained by their introduction. The increase in sieving was greater when deprived, rather than nondeprived, actors were introduced. These results were discussed in relation to the motivational aspects of sieving behavior and the mechanism of social facilitation.

AB - Water-deprived and nondeprived ducklings were reintroduced to a flock companion which had been allowed to partially satiate itself after 3 h of water deprivation. The drinking and sieving behavior of the partially satiated "reactor" bird was immediately increased above that of similar birds left on their own. However, whether or not the introduced "actor" ducklings were deprived had no consequences for the drinking response of the reactor above that obtained by their introduction. The number of companions introduced also failed to have any effect other than that obtained by their introduction. The increase in sieving was greater when deprived, rather than nondeprived, actors were introduced. These results were discussed in relation to the motivational aspects of sieving behavior and the mechanism of social facilitation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017060611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017060611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03214427

DO - 10.3758/BF03214427

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 391

EP - 395

JO - Animal Learning and Behavior

JF - Animal Learning and Behavior

SN - 0090-4996

IS - 4

ER -