Sampling soil water in sandy soils

Comparative analysis of some common methods

M. Ahmed, M. L. Sharma, Q. D. Richards, M. S. Al-Kalbani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1677-1686
Number of pages10
JournalCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Volume32
Issue number11-12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

ceramics
sandy soil
sandy soils
soil water
Sampling
Soils
Water
Silicon Dioxide
silica
sampling
slurry
Sand
soil sampling
sand
Lysimeters
methodology
lysimeters
lysimeter
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
variance analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science
  • Soil Science
  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

Sampling soil water in sandy soils : Comparative analysis of some common methods. / Ahmed, M.; Sharma, M. L.; Richards, Q. D.; Al-Kalbani, M. S.

In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 11-12, 2001, p. 1677-1686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ahmed, M. ; Sharma, M. L. ; Richards, Q. D. ; Al-Kalbani, M. S. / Sampling soil water in sandy soils : Comparative analysis of some common methods. In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2001 ; Vol. 32, No. 11-12. pp. 1677-1686.
@article{5f5a8a13504541d28107787750b5de32,
title = "Sampling soil water in sandy soils: Comparative analysis of some common methods",
abstract = "A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.",
author = "M. Ahmed and Sharma, {M. L.} and Richards, {Q. D.} and Al-Kalbani, {M. S.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1081/CSS-120000242",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1677--1686",
journal = "Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis",
issn = "0010-3624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "11-12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sampling soil water in sandy soils

T2 - Comparative analysis of some common methods

AU - Ahmed, M.

AU - Sharma, M. L.

AU - Richards, Q. D.

AU - Al-Kalbani, M. S.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.

AB - A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034795655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034795655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1081/CSS-120000242

DO - 10.1081/CSS-120000242

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1677

EP - 1686

JO - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

JF - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

SN - 0010-3624

IS - 11-12

ER -