Abstract
A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1677-1686 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 11-12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Plant Science
- Soil Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Cite this
Sampling soil water in sandy soils : Comparative analysis of some common methods. / Ahmed, M.; Sharma, M. L.; Richards, Q. D.; Al-Kalbani, M. S.
In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 11-12, 2001, p. 1677-1686.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sampling soil water in sandy soils
T2 - Comparative analysis of some common methods
AU - Ahmed, M.
AU - Sharma, M. L.
AU - Richards, Q. D.
AU - Al-Kalbani, M. S.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.
AB - A field study was conducted to compare and evaluate chemical composition of soil water collected in sandy soils by three common methods: (i) ceramic suction cup sampling, (ii) drainage lysimetry, and (iii) gravimetric soil sampling. The ceramic cups were installed either by surrounding the cup with silica slurry or sand. The experiment was arranged as a nested factorial design where the three factors were: (i) sampling method, (ii) location, and (iii) time of sampling. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis of data. The study shows that the method of installation (use of silica slurry vs. sand) of ceramic cups had a negligible effect on the mean values, but it appears that by using silica the uncertainty associated with the mean was reduced considerably. The average concentration of NO 3 and Cl were higher for soil sampling than those measured by ceramic cups. The mean values of NO 3, PO 4, and Cl were higher for ceramic cups than for lysimeter although differences proved statistically insignificant.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034795655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034795655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1081/CSS-120000242
DO - 10.1081/CSS-120000242
M3 - Article
VL - 32
SP - 1677
EP - 1686
JO - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
JF - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
SN - 0010-3624
IS - 11-12
ER -