Reward allocation decision making in Arab-Islamic business organizations

An empirical examination through an emic lens

Alexandre Anatolievich Bachkirov, Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate monetary reward allocation decision-making in an Arab-Islamic business environment. Design/methodology/approach: In this mixed-method (quantitative/qualitative) study, data were obtained from a sample of 342 practicing managers of different genders and educational levels working in different industries at different organizational levels in Oman. Findings: The more individualistic personal orientation, the more likely the decision makers are to allocate the biggest reward to the best performer and to believe that the equity principle is best for distributing rewards. In the context of a society transitioning from collectivistic to individualistic cultural values, the level of education is associated with preference for the equity principle in reward allocations. Research limitations/implications: The reported findings advance the theoretical understanding of how an emic perspective can explain reward allocation decision-making in Arab-Islamic environment. Practical implications: Practical implications of this study lie in the guidance that global managers can draw regarding which allocation principle to use in which cultural context: the principle of equity – not equality, need or seniority – is embraced by organizations in the Arabian Gulf. Originality/value: The study examines reward allocation decision-making behavior in the under-researched context of the Arabian Gulf and adds to the body of knowledge based on data obtained from practicing managers rather than college students.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-553
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Reward
Business organization
Decision making
Equity
Managers
Mixed methods
Industry
Educational level
Business environment
Education
Body of knowledge
Equality
Qualitative study
College students
Cultural context
Cultural values
Oman
Guidance
Decision maker
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Arab-Islamic
  • Collectivism versus individualism
  • Decision making beliefs and behaviours
  • Emic perspective
  • Reward allocation decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{621df68001494a8d92da17c336ba5fe1,
title = "Reward allocation decision making in Arab-Islamic business organizations: An empirical examination through an emic lens",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate monetary reward allocation decision-making in an Arab-Islamic business environment. Design/methodology/approach: In this mixed-method (quantitative/qualitative) study, data were obtained from a sample of 342 practicing managers of different genders and educational levels working in different industries at different organizational levels in Oman. Findings: The more individualistic personal orientation, the more likely the decision makers are to allocate the biggest reward to the best performer and to believe that the equity principle is best for distributing rewards. In the context of a society transitioning from collectivistic to individualistic cultural values, the level of education is associated with preference for the equity principle in reward allocations. Research limitations/implications: The reported findings advance the theoretical understanding of how an emic perspective can explain reward allocation decision-making in Arab-Islamic environment. Practical implications: Practical implications of this study lie in the guidance that global managers can draw regarding which allocation principle to use in which cultural context: the principle of equity – not equality, need or seniority – is embraced by organizations in the Arabian Gulf. Originality/value: The study examines reward allocation decision-making behavior in the under-researched context of the Arabian Gulf and adds to the body of knowledge based on data obtained from practicing managers rather than college students.",
keywords = "Arab-Islamic, Collectivism versus individualism, Decision making beliefs and behaviours, Emic perspective, Reward allocation decision making",
author = "Bachkirov, {Alexandre Anatolievich} and Shamsudin, {Faridahwati Mohd}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/IMEFM-12-2016-0177",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "536--553",
journal = "International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management",
issn = "1753-8394",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reward allocation decision making in Arab-Islamic business organizations

T2 - An empirical examination through an emic lens

AU - Bachkirov, Alexandre Anatolievich

AU - Shamsudin, Faridahwati Mohd

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate monetary reward allocation decision-making in an Arab-Islamic business environment. Design/methodology/approach: In this mixed-method (quantitative/qualitative) study, data were obtained from a sample of 342 practicing managers of different genders and educational levels working in different industries at different organizational levels in Oman. Findings: The more individualistic personal orientation, the more likely the decision makers are to allocate the biggest reward to the best performer and to believe that the equity principle is best for distributing rewards. In the context of a society transitioning from collectivistic to individualistic cultural values, the level of education is associated with preference for the equity principle in reward allocations. Research limitations/implications: The reported findings advance the theoretical understanding of how an emic perspective can explain reward allocation decision-making in Arab-Islamic environment. Practical implications: Practical implications of this study lie in the guidance that global managers can draw regarding which allocation principle to use in which cultural context: the principle of equity – not equality, need or seniority – is embraced by organizations in the Arabian Gulf. Originality/value: The study examines reward allocation decision-making behavior in the under-researched context of the Arabian Gulf and adds to the body of knowledge based on data obtained from practicing managers rather than college students.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate monetary reward allocation decision-making in an Arab-Islamic business environment. Design/methodology/approach: In this mixed-method (quantitative/qualitative) study, data were obtained from a sample of 342 practicing managers of different genders and educational levels working in different industries at different organizational levels in Oman. Findings: The more individualistic personal orientation, the more likely the decision makers are to allocate the biggest reward to the best performer and to believe that the equity principle is best for distributing rewards. In the context of a society transitioning from collectivistic to individualistic cultural values, the level of education is associated with preference for the equity principle in reward allocations. Research limitations/implications: The reported findings advance the theoretical understanding of how an emic perspective can explain reward allocation decision-making in Arab-Islamic environment. Practical implications: Practical implications of this study lie in the guidance that global managers can draw regarding which allocation principle to use in which cultural context: the principle of equity – not equality, need or seniority – is embraced by organizations in the Arabian Gulf. Originality/value: The study examines reward allocation decision-making behavior in the under-researched context of the Arabian Gulf and adds to the body of knowledge based on data obtained from practicing managers rather than college students.

KW - Arab-Islamic

KW - Collectivism versus individualism

KW - Decision making beliefs and behaviours

KW - Emic perspective

KW - Reward allocation decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031811102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031811102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IMEFM-12-2016-0177

DO - 10.1108/IMEFM-12-2016-0177

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 536

EP - 553

JO - International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management

JF - International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management

SN - 1753-8394

IS - 4

ER -