Reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts

Zainab S. Al-Hosni, Murtadha Al-Khabori, Sahimah Al-Mamari, Jamal Al-Qasabi, Hiedi Davis, Hatim Al-Lawati, Arwa Z. Al-Riyami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Manual platelet estimation is one of the methods used when automated platelet estimates are very low. However, the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation has not been adequately studied. We sought to assess the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts and to evaluate the impact of the level of experience of the person counting on the reproducibility of manual platelet estimates. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood films of patients with platelet counts less than 100 × 109/L were retrieved and given to four raters to perform manual platelet estimation independently using a predefined method (average of platelet counts in 10 fields using 100× objective multiplied by 20). Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a method of reproducibility assessment. Results: The ICC across the four raters was 0.840, indicating excellent agreement. The median difference of the two most experienced raters was 0 (range: -64 to 78). The level of platelet estimate by the least-experienced rater predicted the disagreement (p = 0.037). When assessing the difference between pairs of raters, there was no significant difference in the ICC (p = 0.420). Conclusions: The agreement between different raters using manual platelet estimation was excellent. Further confirmation is necessary, with a prospective study using a gold standard method of platelet counts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-413
Number of pages5
JournalOman Medical Journal
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Platelet Count
Blood Platelets
Cross-Sectional Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Blood platelets
  • Examination
  • Interpretation
  • Peripheral blood smear
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts. / Al-Hosni, Zainab S.; Al-Khabori, Murtadha; Al-Mamari, Sahimah; Al-Qasabi, Jamal; Davis, Hiedi; Al-Lawati, Hatim; Al-Riyami, Arwa Z.

In: Oman Medical Journal, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 409-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Hosni, Zainab S. ; Al-Khabori, Murtadha ; Al-Mamari, Sahimah ; Al-Qasabi, Jamal ; Davis, Hiedi ; Al-Lawati, Hatim ; Al-Riyami, Arwa Z. / Reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts. In: Oman Medical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 409-413.
@article{ce1bcdb69eba4367b42222cb255a298d,
title = "Reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts",
abstract = "Objectives: Manual platelet estimation is one of the methods used when automated platelet estimates are very low. However, the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation has not been adequately studied. We sought to assess the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts and to evaluate the impact of the level of experience of the person counting on the reproducibility of manual platelet estimates. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood films of patients with platelet counts less than 100 × 109/L were retrieved and given to four raters to perform manual platelet estimation independently using a predefined method (average of platelet counts in 10 fields using 100× objective multiplied by 20). Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a method of reproducibility assessment. Results: The ICC across the four raters was 0.840, indicating excellent agreement. The median difference of the two most experienced raters was 0 (range: -64 to 78). The level of platelet estimate by the least-experienced rater predicted the disagreement (p = 0.037). When assessing the difference between pairs of raters, there was no significant difference in the ICC (p = 0.420). Conclusions: The agreement between different raters using manual platelet estimation was excellent. Further confirmation is necessary, with a prospective study using a gold standard method of platelet counts.",
keywords = "Blood platelets, Examination, Interpretation, Peripheral blood smear, Reliability",
author = "Al-Hosni, {Zainab S.} and Murtadha Al-Khabori and Sahimah Al-Mamari and Jamal Al-Qasabi and Hiedi Davis and Hatim Al-Lawati and Al-Riyami, {Arwa Z.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5001/omj.2016.83",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "409--413",
journal = "Oman Medical Journal",
issn = "1999-768X",
publisher = "Oman Medical Specialty Board",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts

AU - Al-Hosni, Zainab S.

AU - Al-Khabori, Murtadha

AU - Al-Mamari, Sahimah

AU - Al-Qasabi, Jamal

AU - Davis, Hiedi

AU - Al-Lawati, Hatim

AU - Al-Riyami, Arwa Z.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objectives: Manual platelet estimation is one of the methods used when automated platelet estimates are very low. However, the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation has not been adequately studied. We sought to assess the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts and to evaluate the impact of the level of experience of the person counting on the reproducibility of manual platelet estimates. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood films of patients with platelet counts less than 100 × 109/L were retrieved and given to four raters to perform manual platelet estimation independently using a predefined method (average of platelet counts in 10 fields using 100× objective multiplied by 20). Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a method of reproducibility assessment. Results: The ICC across the four raters was 0.840, indicating excellent agreement. The median difference of the two most experienced raters was 0 (range: -64 to 78). The level of platelet estimate by the least-experienced rater predicted the disagreement (p = 0.037). When assessing the difference between pairs of raters, there was no significant difference in the ICC (p = 0.420). Conclusions: The agreement between different raters using manual platelet estimation was excellent. Further confirmation is necessary, with a prospective study using a gold standard method of platelet counts.

AB - Objectives: Manual platelet estimation is one of the methods used when automated platelet estimates are very low. However, the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation has not been adequately studied. We sought to assess the reproducibility of manual platelet estimation following automated low platelet counts and to evaluate the impact of the level of experience of the person counting on the reproducibility of manual platelet estimates. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood films of patients with platelet counts less than 100 × 109/L were retrieved and given to four raters to perform manual platelet estimation independently using a predefined method (average of platelet counts in 10 fields using 100× objective multiplied by 20). Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a method of reproducibility assessment. Results: The ICC across the four raters was 0.840, indicating excellent agreement. The median difference of the two most experienced raters was 0 (range: -64 to 78). The level of platelet estimate by the least-experienced rater predicted the disagreement (p = 0.037). When assessing the difference between pairs of raters, there was no significant difference in the ICC (p = 0.420). Conclusions: The agreement between different raters using manual platelet estimation was excellent. Further confirmation is necessary, with a prospective study using a gold standard method of platelet counts.

KW - Blood platelets

KW - Examination

KW - Interpretation

KW - Peripheral blood smear

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994559368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994559368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5001/omj.2016.83

DO - 10.5001/omj.2016.83

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 409

EP - 413

JO - Oman Medical Journal

JF - Oman Medical Journal

SN - 1999-768X

IS - 6

ER -