Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power

Radhouane Haj-Sassi, Wajdi Dardouri, Zied Gharbi, Anis Chaouachi, Hamda Mansour, Ahmed Rabhi, Mohamed Elhedi Mahfoudhi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a repeated modified agility test (RMAT) to assess anaerobic power and explosiveness. Twenty-seven subjects (age: 20.2 ± 0.9 years, body mass: 66.1 6.0 kg, height: 176 ± 6 cm, and body fat: 11.4 ± 2.6%) participated in this study. After familiarization, subjects completed the RMAT consisting of 10 × 20-m maximal running performances (moving in forward, lateral, and backward) with ∼25-second recovery between each run. Ten subjects performed the RMAT twice separated by at least 48 hours to evaluate relative and absolute reliability and usefulness of the test. The criterion validity of the RMAT was determined by examining the relationship between RMAT indices and the Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) performances and both vertical and horizontal jumps. Reliability of the total time (TT) and peak time (PT) of the RMAT was very good, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90 and SEM < 5% and low bias. The usefulness of TT and PT of the RMAT was rated as ''good'' and ''OK,'' respectively. The TT of the RMAT had significant correlations with the WAT (peak power: r = 20.44; mean power: r =20.72), vertical jumps (squat jump: r = 20.50; countermovement jump: r = 20.61; drop jump (DJ): r = 20.55; DJ with dominant leg: r = 20.72; DJ with nondominant leg: r = 20.53) and 5 jump test (r = 20.56). These findings suggest that the RMAT is a reliable and valid test for assessing anaerobic power and explosiveness in multisprint sport athletes. Consequently, the RMAT is an easily applied, inexpensive field test and can provide coaches and strength and conditioning professionals with relevant information concerning the choice and the efficacy of training programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-480
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Leg
Running
Athletes
Sports
Adipose Tissue
Education

Keywords

  • Anaerobic performance
  • Intermittent exercise
  • Sprinting
  • Usefulness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power. / Haj-Sassi, Radhouane; Dardouri, Wajdi; Gharbi, Zied; Chaouachi, Anis; Mansour, Hamda; Rabhi, Ahmed; Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 472-480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haj-Sassi, Radhouane ; Dardouri, Wajdi ; Gharbi, Zied ; Chaouachi, Anis ; Mansour, Hamda ; Rabhi, Ahmed ; Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi. / Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 472-480.
@article{038a6f74be5e49988ad43fd89715d02d,
title = "Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a repeated modified agility test (RMAT) to assess anaerobic power and explosiveness. Twenty-seven subjects (age: 20.2 ± 0.9 years, body mass: 66.1 6.0 kg, height: 176 ± 6 cm, and body fat: 11.4 ± 2.6{\%}) participated in this study. After familiarization, subjects completed the RMAT consisting of 10 × 20-m maximal running performances (moving in forward, lateral, and backward) with ∼25-second recovery between each run. Ten subjects performed the RMAT twice separated by at least 48 hours to evaluate relative and absolute reliability and usefulness of the test. The criterion validity of the RMAT was determined by examining the relationship between RMAT indices and the Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) performances and both vertical and horizontal jumps. Reliability of the total time (TT) and peak time (PT) of the RMAT was very good, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90 and SEM < 5{\%} and low bias. The usefulness of TT and PT of the RMAT was rated as ''good'' and ''OK,'' respectively. The TT of the RMAT had significant correlations with the WAT (peak power: r = 20.44; mean power: r =20.72), vertical jumps (squat jump: r = 20.50; countermovement jump: r = 20.61; drop jump (DJ): r = 20.55; DJ with dominant leg: r = 20.72; DJ with nondominant leg: r = 20.53) and 5 jump test (r = 20.56). These findings suggest that the RMAT is a reliable and valid test for assessing anaerobic power and explosiveness in multisprint sport athletes. Consequently, the RMAT is an easily applied, inexpensive field test and can provide coaches and strength and conditioning professionals with relevant information concerning the choice and the efficacy of training programs.",
keywords = "Anaerobic performance, Intermittent exercise, Sprinting, Usefulness",
author = "Radhouane Haj-Sassi and Wajdi Dardouri and Zied Gharbi and Anis Chaouachi and Hamda Mansour and Ahmed Rabhi and Mahfoudhi, {Mohamed Elhedi}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182018186",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "472--480",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power

AU - Haj-Sassi, Radhouane

AU - Dardouri, Wajdi

AU - Gharbi, Zied

AU - Chaouachi, Anis

AU - Mansour, Hamda

AU - Rabhi, Ahmed

AU - Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a repeated modified agility test (RMAT) to assess anaerobic power and explosiveness. Twenty-seven subjects (age: 20.2 ± 0.9 years, body mass: 66.1 6.0 kg, height: 176 ± 6 cm, and body fat: 11.4 ± 2.6%) participated in this study. After familiarization, subjects completed the RMAT consisting of 10 × 20-m maximal running performances (moving in forward, lateral, and backward) with ∼25-second recovery between each run. Ten subjects performed the RMAT twice separated by at least 48 hours to evaluate relative and absolute reliability and usefulness of the test. The criterion validity of the RMAT was determined by examining the relationship between RMAT indices and the Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) performances and both vertical and horizontal jumps. Reliability of the total time (TT) and peak time (PT) of the RMAT was very good, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90 and SEM < 5% and low bias. The usefulness of TT and PT of the RMAT was rated as ''good'' and ''OK,'' respectively. The TT of the RMAT had significant correlations with the WAT (peak power: r = 20.44; mean power: r =20.72), vertical jumps (squat jump: r = 20.50; countermovement jump: r = 20.61; drop jump (DJ): r = 20.55; DJ with dominant leg: r = 20.72; DJ with nondominant leg: r = 20.53) and 5 jump test (r = 20.56). These findings suggest that the RMAT is a reliable and valid test for assessing anaerobic power and explosiveness in multisprint sport athletes. Consequently, the RMAT is an easily applied, inexpensive field test and can provide coaches and strength and conditioning professionals with relevant information concerning the choice and the efficacy of training programs.

AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a repeated modified agility test (RMAT) to assess anaerobic power and explosiveness. Twenty-seven subjects (age: 20.2 ± 0.9 years, body mass: 66.1 6.0 kg, height: 176 ± 6 cm, and body fat: 11.4 ± 2.6%) participated in this study. After familiarization, subjects completed the RMAT consisting of 10 × 20-m maximal running performances (moving in forward, lateral, and backward) with ∼25-second recovery between each run. Ten subjects performed the RMAT twice separated by at least 48 hours to evaluate relative and absolute reliability and usefulness of the test. The criterion validity of the RMAT was determined by examining the relationship between RMAT indices and the Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) performances and both vertical and horizontal jumps. Reliability of the total time (TT) and peak time (PT) of the RMAT was very good, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90 and SEM < 5% and low bias. The usefulness of TT and PT of the RMAT was rated as ''good'' and ''OK,'' respectively. The TT of the RMAT had significant correlations with the WAT (peak power: r = 20.44; mean power: r =20.72), vertical jumps (squat jump: r = 20.50; countermovement jump: r = 20.61; drop jump (DJ): r = 20.55; DJ with dominant leg: r = 20.72; DJ with nondominant leg: r = 20.53) and 5 jump test (r = 20.56). These findings suggest that the RMAT is a reliable and valid test for assessing anaerobic power and explosiveness in multisprint sport athletes. Consequently, the RMAT is an easily applied, inexpensive field test and can provide coaches and strength and conditioning professionals with relevant information concerning the choice and the efficacy of training programs.

KW - Anaerobic performance

KW - Intermittent exercise

KW - Sprinting

KW - Usefulness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953838427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953838427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182018186

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182018186

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 472

EP - 480

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 2

ER -