Reliability and validity of a new maximal anaerobic shuttle running test

W. Dardouri*, Z. Gharbi, M. A. Selmi, R. H. Sassi, W. Moalla, K. Chamari, N. Souissi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: first to assess the relative and absolute reliability of a new Maximal Anaerobic Shuttle Running Test (MASRT), and second to evaluate the criterion validity of the MASRT. 16 team sport players participated in this study. The velocity (VMASRT) and the number of shuttles achieved at volitional exhaustion were measured. To assess the reliability of the MASRT, each player performed the MASRT twice, on separate days. The criterion validity of the MASRT was determined by examining the relationship between MASRT indices and the Wingate test (WingT) performances. Results showed no difference between test-retest MASRT scores for V MASRT and the number of shuttles (P>0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values for VMASRT and Shuttle number were 0.84 and 0.80, respectively. The coefficients of variation (CV) and the mean difference (bias)±the 95% limits of agreement for the same variables were 3.6 and 12.9%, and 0.02±0.37m·s-1 and 0.3±6.7, respectively. The strongest correlation was found between mean power output relative to body mass (MPO) measured during the WingT and V MASRT (r=0.77, P<0.001). The MASRT constitutes a reliable and valid field tool for assessing short term repeated running capacity of team sport players.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-315
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • anaerobic performance
  • intermittent sports
  • velocity running
  • Wingate test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of a new maximal anaerobic shuttle running test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this