Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint

Radhouane Haj Sassi, Wajdi Dardouri, Mohamed Haj Yahmed, Nabil Gmada, Mohamed Elhedi Mahfoudhi, Zied Gharbi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a modified agility T-test (MAT) and to examine its relationship to the free countermovement jump (FCMJ) and the 10-m straight sprint (10mSS). In this new version, we preserved the same nature of displacement of the T-test but we reduced the total distance to cover. A total of 86 subjects (34 women: age = 22.6 ± 1.4 years; weight = 63.7 ± 10.2 kg; height =1.65 ± 0.05 m; body mass index = 23.3 ± 3.3 kg-m-2 and 52 men: age = 22.4 ± 1.5 years; weight = 68.7 ± 8.0 kg; height = 1.77 ± 0.06 m; body mass index = 22.0 ± 2.0 kg-m-2) performed MAT, T-test, FCMJ, and 10mSS. Our results showed no difference between test-retest MAT scores. Intraclass reliability of the MAT was greater than 0.90 across the trials (0.92 and 0.95 for women and men, respectively). The mean difference (bias) ± the 95% limits of agreement was 0.03 ± 0.37 seconds for women and 0.03 ± 0.33 seconds for men. MAT was correlated to the T-test (r = 0.79, p < 0.001 and r = 0.75, p < 0.001 for women and men, respectively). Significant correlations were found between both MAT and FCMJ, and MAT and 10mSS for women (r = -0.47, p < 0.01 and r = 0.34, p < 0.05, respectively). No significant correlations were found between MAT and all other tests for men. These results indicate that MAT is a reliable test to assess agility. The weak relationship between MAT and strength and straight speed suggests that agility requires other determinants of performance as coordination. Considering that field sports generally include sprints with change direction over short distance, MAT seems to be more specific than the T-test when assessing agility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1644-1651
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Body Mass Index
Weights and Measures
Sports
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Agility
  • Change direction
  • Field-testing
  • Speed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint. / Sassi, Radhouane Haj; Dardouri, Wajdi; Yahmed, Mohamed Haj; Gmada, Nabil; Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi; Gharbi, Zied.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.09.2009, p. 1644-1651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sassi, Radhouane Haj ; Dardouri, Wajdi ; Yahmed, Mohamed Haj ; Gmada, Nabil ; Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi ; Gharbi, Zied. / Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 1644-1651.
@article{4247afebeb2d41909447d05be5592903,
title = "Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint",
abstract = "The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a modified agility T-test (MAT) and to examine its relationship to the free countermovement jump (FCMJ) and the 10-m straight sprint (10mSS). In this new version, we preserved the same nature of displacement of the T-test but we reduced the total distance to cover. A total of 86 subjects (34 women: age = 22.6 ± 1.4 years; weight = 63.7 ± 10.2 kg; height =1.65 ± 0.05 m; body mass index = 23.3 ± 3.3 kg-m-2 and 52 men: age = 22.4 ± 1.5 years; weight = 68.7 ± 8.0 kg; height = 1.77 ± 0.06 m; body mass index = 22.0 ± 2.0 kg-m-2) performed MAT, T-test, FCMJ, and 10mSS. Our results showed no difference between test-retest MAT scores. Intraclass reliability of the MAT was greater than 0.90 across the trials (0.92 and 0.95 for women and men, respectively). The mean difference (bias) ± the 95{\%} limits of agreement was 0.03 ± 0.37 seconds for women and 0.03 ± 0.33 seconds for men. MAT was correlated to the T-test (r = 0.79, p < 0.001 and r = 0.75, p < 0.001 for women and men, respectively). Significant correlations were found between both MAT and FCMJ, and MAT and 10mSS for women (r = -0.47, p < 0.01 and r = 0.34, p < 0.05, respectively). No significant correlations were found between MAT and all other tests for men. These results indicate that MAT is a reliable test to assess agility. The weak relationship between MAT and strength and straight speed suggests that agility requires other determinants of performance as coordination. Considering that field sports generally include sprints with change direction over short distance, MAT seems to be more specific than the T-test when assessing agility.",
keywords = "Agility, Change direction, Field-testing, Speed",
author = "Sassi, {Radhouane Haj} and Wajdi Dardouri and Yahmed, {Mohamed Haj} and Nabil Gmada and Mahfoudhi, {Mohamed Elhedi} and Zied Gharbi",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b425d2",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1644--1651",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint

AU - Sassi, Radhouane Haj

AU - Dardouri, Wajdi

AU - Yahmed, Mohamed Haj

AU - Gmada, Nabil

AU - Mahfoudhi, Mohamed Elhedi

AU - Gharbi, Zied

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a modified agility T-test (MAT) and to examine its relationship to the free countermovement jump (FCMJ) and the 10-m straight sprint (10mSS). In this new version, we preserved the same nature of displacement of the T-test but we reduced the total distance to cover. A total of 86 subjects (34 women: age = 22.6 ± 1.4 years; weight = 63.7 ± 10.2 kg; height =1.65 ± 0.05 m; body mass index = 23.3 ± 3.3 kg-m-2 and 52 men: age = 22.4 ± 1.5 years; weight = 68.7 ± 8.0 kg; height = 1.77 ± 0.06 m; body mass index = 22.0 ± 2.0 kg-m-2) performed MAT, T-test, FCMJ, and 10mSS. Our results showed no difference between test-retest MAT scores. Intraclass reliability of the MAT was greater than 0.90 across the trials (0.92 and 0.95 for women and men, respectively). The mean difference (bias) ± the 95% limits of agreement was 0.03 ± 0.37 seconds for women and 0.03 ± 0.33 seconds for men. MAT was correlated to the T-test (r = 0.79, p < 0.001 and r = 0.75, p < 0.001 for women and men, respectively). Significant correlations were found between both MAT and FCMJ, and MAT and 10mSS for women (r = -0.47, p < 0.01 and r = 0.34, p < 0.05, respectively). No significant correlations were found between MAT and all other tests for men. These results indicate that MAT is a reliable test to assess agility. The weak relationship between MAT and strength and straight speed suggests that agility requires other determinants of performance as coordination. Considering that field sports generally include sprints with change direction over short distance, MAT seems to be more specific than the T-test when assessing agility.

AB - The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a modified agility T-test (MAT) and to examine its relationship to the free countermovement jump (FCMJ) and the 10-m straight sprint (10mSS). In this new version, we preserved the same nature of displacement of the T-test but we reduced the total distance to cover. A total of 86 subjects (34 women: age = 22.6 ± 1.4 years; weight = 63.7 ± 10.2 kg; height =1.65 ± 0.05 m; body mass index = 23.3 ± 3.3 kg-m-2 and 52 men: age = 22.4 ± 1.5 years; weight = 68.7 ± 8.0 kg; height = 1.77 ± 0.06 m; body mass index = 22.0 ± 2.0 kg-m-2) performed MAT, T-test, FCMJ, and 10mSS. Our results showed no difference between test-retest MAT scores. Intraclass reliability of the MAT was greater than 0.90 across the trials (0.92 and 0.95 for women and men, respectively). The mean difference (bias) ± the 95% limits of agreement was 0.03 ± 0.37 seconds for women and 0.03 ± 0.33 seconds for men. MAT was correlated to the T-test (r = 0.79, p < 0.001 and r = 0.75, p < 0.001 for women and men, respectively). Significant correlations were found between both MAT and FCMJ, and MAT and 10mSS for women (r = -0.47, p < 0.01 and r = 0.34, p < 0.05, respectively). No significant correlations were found between MAT and all other tests for men. These results indicate that MAT is a reliable test to assess agility. The weak relationship between MAT and strength and straight speed suggests that agility requires other determinants of performance as coordination. Considering that field sports generally include sprints with change direction over short distance, MAT seems to be more specific than the T-test when assessing agility.

KW - Agility

KW - Change direction

KW - Field-testing

KW - Speed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449334582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449334582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b425d2

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b425d2

M3 - Article

C2 - 19675502

AN - SCOPUS:70449334582

VL - 23

SP - 1644

EP - 1651

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 6

ER -