Reduced-input agricultural systems: Rationale and prospects

Frederick H. Buttel, Gilbert W. Gillespie, Rhonda Janke, Brian Caldwell, Marianne Sarrantonio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many respects the long standing and vigorous debates over alternative agriculture and organic farming are becoming less strident and less polarized. However, despite the mounting evidence that key elements of both the conventional and alternative agricultural communities are beginning to “build bridges” to each other, and to establish formal institutional programs and arrangements for improved communication and program development, important differences continue to separate the proponents and opponents of alternative agriculture. In part, these lingering differences result from the lack of adequate and reliable data, misinformation, and faulty data analyses. In order to clarify those issues which continue to divide the critics and advocates of alternative agriculture, this reappraisal of the debate begins with a methodological critique of comparison studies of conventional and organic farms. Also included is an assessment of fertilizer and pesticide use in American agriculture, the environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-input systems, the relationship between alternative agriculture and efforts to save the family farmer, and the prospects for increased public sector research on reduced-input farming systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-64
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1986

Fingerprint

alternative farming
Agriculture
Organic Agriculture
misinformation
public sector
program planning
communication (human)
organic production
Communication
environmental impact
Program Development
pesticides
farming systems
Public Sector
Fertilizers
fertilizers
farmers
agriculture
Pesticides
farms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reduced-input agricultural systems : Rationale and prospects. / Buttel, Frederick H.; Gillespie, Gilbert W.; Janke, Rhonda; Caldwell, Brian; Sarrantonio, Marianne.

In: American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1986, p. 58-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buttel, Frederick H. ; Gillespie, Gilbert W. ; Janke, Rhonda ; Caldwell, Brian ; Sarrantonio, Marianne. / Reduced-input agricultural systems : Rationale and prospects. In: American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 1986 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 58-64.
@article{90a9520b6b5041c0b4f617f7cb3b5b53,
title = "Reduced-input agricultural systems: Rationale and prospects",
abstract = "In many respects the long standing and vigorous debates over alternative agriculture and organic farming are becoming less strident and less polarized. However, despite the mounting evidence that key elements of both the conventional and alternative agricultural communities are beginning to “build bridges” to each other, and to establish formal institutional programs and arrangements for improved communication and program development, important differences continue to separate the proponents and opponents of alternative agriculture. In part, these lingering differences result from the lack of adequate and reliable data, misinformation, and faulty data analyses. In order to clarify those issues which continue to divide the critics and advocates of alternative agriculture, this reappraisal of the debate begins with a methodological critique of comparison studies of conventional and organic farms. Also included is an assessment of fertilizer and pesticide use in American agriculture, the environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-input systems, the relationship between alternative agriculture and efforts to save the family farmer, and the prospects for increased public sector research on reduced-input farming systems.",
author = "Buttel, {Frederick H.} and Gillespie, {Gilbert W.} and Rhonda Janke and Brian Caldwell and Marianne Sarrantonio",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1017/S0889189300000898",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "58--64",
journal = "Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems",
issn = "1742-1705",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reduced-input agricultural systems

T2 - Rationale and prospects

AU - Buttel, Frederick H.

AU - Gillespie, Gilbert W.

AU - Janke, Rhonda

AU - Caldwell, Brian

AU - Sarrantonio, Marianne

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - In many respects the long standing and vigorous debates over alternative agriculture and organic farming are becoming less strident and less polarized. However, despite the mounting evidence that key elements of both the conventional and alternative agricultural communities are beginning to “build bridges” to each other, and to establish formal institutional programs and arrangements for improved communication and program development, important differences continue to separate the proponents and opponents of alternative agriculture. In part, these lingering differences result from the lack of adequate and reliable data, misinformation, and faulty data analyses. In order to clarify those issues which continue to divide the critics and advocates of alternative agriculture, this reappraisal of the debate begins with a methodological critique of comparison studies of conventional and organic farms. Also included is an assessment of fertilizer and pesticide use in American agriculture, the environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-input systems, the relationship between alternative agriculture and efforts to save the family farmer, and the prospects for increased public sector research on reduced-input farming systems.

AB - In many respects the long standing and vigorous debates over alternative agriculture and organic farming are becoming less strident and less polarized. However, despite the mounting evidence that key elements of both the conventional and alternative agricultural communities are beginning to “build bridges” to each other, and to establish formal institutional programs and arrangements for improved communication and program development, important differences continue to separate the proponents and opponents of alternative agriculture. In part, these lingering differences result from the lack of adequate and reliable data, misinformation, and faulty data analyses. In order to clarify those issues which continue to divide the critics and advocates of alternative agriculture, this reappraisal of the debate begins with a methodological critique of comparison studies of conventional and organic farms. Also included is an assessment of fertilizer and pesticide use in American agriculture, the environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-input systems, the relationship between alternative agriculture and efforts to save the family farmer, and the prospects for increased public sector research on reduced-input farming systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007655394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007655394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0889189300000898

DO - 10.1017/S0889189300000898

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007655394

VL - 1

SP - 58

EP - 64

JO - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

JF - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

SN - 1742-1705

IS - 2

ER -