Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department

L. M. Lamki, T. P. Haynie, D. A. Podoloff, E. E. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the general principles of quality assurance (QA) in an imaging department, with emphasis on nuclear medicine. The various steps taken during the development of the QA program reflect the response of the QA committee as it came to a better understanding of the components of QA. Accrediting and regulatory bodies have had important roles in providing guidance. Quality control of instrumentation and radiopharmaceuticals opened the gateway to monitoring in high-volume, high-risk areas; however, QA expanded this concept into better generic and clinical monitoring. Encouragement of the use of quality of care referral forms resulted in greater participation by all members of the department. Examples of physicians' QA activities include double reading of images and sending of code cards. Experience with other forms of physician QA activities is also included. The QA committee provides a forum for five steps of QA: identify problems, assess the causes, implement action to prevent them, monitor effects of the actions, and document these activities. These steps should lead to improvement in the standards of patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-614
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume177
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Nuclear Medicine
Physicians
Radiopharmaceuticals
Quality of Health Care
Standard of Care
Quality Control
Reading
Patient Care
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • Radiology and radiologists, departmental management
  • Radionuclide imaging, quality assurance
  • State-of-art reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Lamki, L. M., Haynie, T. P., Podoloff, D. A., & Kim, E. E. (1990). Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department. Radiology, 177(3), 609-614.

Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department. / Lamki, L. M.; Haynie, T. P.; Podoloff, D. A.; Kim, E. E.

In: Radiology, Vol. 177, No. 3, 1990, p. 609-614.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lamki, LM, Haynie, TP, Podoloff, DA & Kim, EE 1990, 'Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department', Radiology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 609-614.
Lamki LM, Haynie TP, Podoloff DA, Kim EE. Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department. Radiology. 1990;177(3):609-614.
Lamki, L. M. ; Haynie, T. P. ; Podoloff, D. A. ; Kim, E. E. / Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department. In: Radiology. 1990 ; Vol. 177, No. 3. pp. 609-614.
@article{53f05c30c2b6424db0416640098daba6,
title = "Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department",
abstract = "This article reviews the general principles of quality assurance (QA) in an imaging department, with emphasis on nuclear medicine. The various steps taken during the development of the QA program reflect the response of the QA committee as it came to a better understanding of the components of QA. Accrediting and regulatory bodies have had important roles in providing guidance. Quality control of instrumentation and radiopharmaceuticals opened the gateway to monitoring in high-volume, high-risk areas; however, QA expanded this concept into better generic and clinical monitoring. Encouragement of the use of quality of care referral forms resulted in greater participation by all members of the department. Examples of physicians' QA activities include double reading of images and sending of code cards. Experience with other forms of physician QA activities is also included. The QA committee provides a forum for five steps of QA: identify problems, assess the causes, implement action to prevent them, monitor effects of the actions, and document these activities. These steps should lead to improvement in the standards of patient care.",
keywords = "Radiology and radiologists, departmental management, Radionuclide imaging, quality assurance, State-of-art reviews",
author = "Lamki, {L. M.} and Haynie, {T. P.} and Podoloff, {D. A.} and Kim, {E. E.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
pages = "609--614",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality assurance in a nuclear medicine department

AU - Lamki, L. M.

AU - Haynie, T. P.

AU - Podoloff, D. A.

AU - Kim, E. E.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - This article reviews the general principles of quality assurance (QA) in an imaging department, with emphasis on nuclear medicine. The various steps taken during the development of the QA program reflect the response of the QA committee as it came to a better understanding of the components of QA. Accrediting and regulatory bodies have had important roles in providing guidance. Quality control of instrumentation and radiopharmaceuticals opened the gateway to monitoring in high-volume, high-risk areas; however, QA expanded this concept into better generic and clinical monitoring. Encouragement of the use of quality of care referral forms resulted in greater participation by all members of the department. Examples of physicians' QA activities include double reading of images and sending of code cards. Experience with other forms of physician QA activities is also included. The QA committee provides a forum for five steps of QA: identify problems, assess the causes, implement action to prevent them, monitor effects of the actions, and document these activities. These steps should lead to improvement in the standards of patient care.

AB - This article reviews the general principles of quality assurance (QA) in an imaging department, with emphasis on nuclear medicine. The various steps taken during the development of the QA program reflect the response of the QA committee as it came to a better understanding of the components of QA. Accrediting and regulatory bodies have had important roles in providing guidance. Quality control of instrumentation and radiopharmaceuticals opened the gateway to monitoring in high-volume, high-risk areas; however, QA expanded this concept into better generic and clinical monitoring. Encouragement of the use of quality of care referral forms resulted in greater participation by all members of the department. Examples of physicians' QA activities include double reading of images and sending of code cards. Experience with other forms of physician QA activities is also included. The QA committee provides a forum for five steps of QA: identify problems, assess the causes, implement action to prevent them, monitor effects of the actions, and document these activities. These steps should lead to improvement in the standards of patient care.

KW - Radiology and radiologists, departmental management

KW - Radionuclide imaging, quality assurance

KW - State-of-art reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025258872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025258872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 177

SP - 609

EP - 614

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -