TY - JOUR
T1 - Public Diplomacy Of Oman
AU - Yenigun, M. Cuneyt
AU - Yari, Houchang
AU - Al Maani, Abdullah
N1 - 1. Amirbek, A., & Ydyrys, K. (2014). Education and Soft Power: Analysis as an Instrument of Foreign Policy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.428 2. Ayhan, K. J. (2019). Boundaries of Public Diplomacy and Nonstate Actors: A Taxonomy of Perspectives. International Studies Perspectives, 20 (1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky010 3. Craig Hayden. (2012). The Rhetoric of Soft Power : Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. 4. Golan, G. J., & Viatchaninova, E. (2013). Government Social Responsibility in Public Diplomacy: Russia’s strategic use of advertorials. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 403– 405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.09.011 5. Ingenhoff, D., & Marschlich, S. (2019). Corporate diplomacy and political CSR: Similarities, differences and theoretical implications. Public Relations Review, 45(2), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.01.002 6. Kim, J. (2016). Public relations and public diplomacy in cultural and educational exchange programs: A coorientational approach to the Humphrey Program. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.008 7. Mogensen, K. (2017). From public relations to corporate public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011 8. National Center for Statistics and Information (NCSI), Oman, 2020. https://data.gov.om/OMEDCT2016/education?accesskey=ocuudye&lang=en
9. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699 10. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2009). Get Smart- Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs, 88(4), 160–163. 11. Oman Diwan of Royal Court, Sultan Qaboos Higher Centre for Culture and Science, https://sqhccs.gov.om/affiliates/index/16?lang=english 12. Oman Observer, “Oman Centre for Arabic Language and Culture opens in Belarus”, 19.04.2018. https://www.omanobserver.om/oman-centre-for-arabic-language-andculture-opens-in-belarus/ 13. Pacher, A. (2018). The ritual creation of political symbols: International exchanges in public diplomacy. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 20(4), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118786043 14. Pajtinka, Erik. (2016). Military Diplomacy and Its Present Functions. Security Dimensions. International and National Studies, 9(3), 179-194. 15. Park Se Jung & Lim Yon Soo (2014) Information networks and social media use in public diplomacy: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Japan, Asian Journal of Communication, 24:1, 79-98, DOI: 10.1080/01292986.2013.851724 16. Simons, G. (2014). Russian public diplomacy in the 21st century: Structure, means and message. Public Relations Review, 40 (3), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.03.002 17. Sultan Qaboos Cultural Center (SQCC) , Washington, USA. https://www.sqcc.org/ 18. UNESCO (2013). New Agencies, Their Structure and Operation, UN. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000073446 19. Weber, F., & Larsson-Olaison, U. (2017). Corporate social responsibility accounting for arising issues. Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 370–383. https:// doi.org/10.1108/jcom-02-2017-0028. 20. Wiseman, G. (2015). Isolate or Engage : Adversarial States, US Foreign Policy, and Public Diplomacy. Stanford University Press. 21. Yenigun, C., Baig, S., (2021) Omani Renaissance in International Relations and Political Economy, Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications (BBRC), Special Issue, 13(15), 79-87. https://bbrc.in/ 22. Yenigun, C., Yari, H., Al Maani A., (2021) New Public Diplomacy in the New Millennium, Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, (CIBG),27(2), 6272-6282. https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.616 23. Yenigun, C., Basoos H., Hassan, G., (2020) Negotiation level between EU and the GCC, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(11), 65-75. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_11/141107_Yenigun_2020_E1_R.pdf 24. Yenigun, C. (2013) Gulf Security, NATO and the ICI, International Conference on NATO’s Approach to the Gulf Cooperation. Dubai, UAE, 33-48. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/CueneytYeniguen/publication/281408904_Gulf_Security_NATO_and_ICI_Two_and_a_Half/link s/55e5d33808aec74dbe74db39/Gulf-Security-NATO-and-ICI-Two-and-a-Half.pdf 25. Zaharna, R. S., & Uysal, N. (2016). Going for the jugular in public diplomacy: How adversarial publics using social media are challenging state legitimacy. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.006
Zhang, J., & Swartz, B. C. (2009). Toward a model of NGO media diplomacy in the Internet age: Case study of Washington Profile. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.018
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Oman is an under-studied country in scholarly circles despite its unique and exclusive role in the arduous fields of international conflict mediation and resolution. The present study seeks to an unassuming manner fill this gap a little in the field of Oman’s foreign policy. The new and diverse instruments of public diplomacy are increasing their influence and relevancy as well as in the world. Today, the range of new at the disposal of public diplomacy has been growing exponentially. These are the diaspora, relations with IGOs, infomercials, news agencies, scholarships, social media tools, cultural centers, cooking, music, different types of exchange programs, etc. The number of these public diplomacy tools that we updated in this research is 37. Those instruments are used to study the implementation of public diplomacy in Oman. The paper focuses on how Oman practices its public diplomacy with new instruments in the region and beyond. It first examines rhetoric’s practical applications. It then analysis some 431 responses to our electronic and physical surveys carried out in 63 countries by the aim of understanding the level of appreciation of Oman's public diplomacy worldwide. After a careful analysis of the results of the survey, it became clear that Oman needs a modern set of tools and strong strategies if she hopes to successfully implement and achieve the goals of its public diplomacy.
AB - Oman is an under-studied country in scholarly circles despite its unique and exclusive role in the arduous fields of international conflict mediation and resolution. The present study seeks to an unassuming manner fill this gap a little in the field of Oman’s foreign policy. The new and diverse instruments of public diplomacy are increasing their influence and relevancy as well as in the world. Today, the range of new at the disposal of public diplomacy has been growing exponentially. These are the diaspora, relations with IGOs, infomercials, news agencies, scholarships, social media tools, cultural centers, cooking, music, different types of exchange programs, etc. The number of these public diplomacy tools that we updated in this research is 37. Those instruments are used to study the implementation of public diplomacy in Oman. The paper focuses on how Oman practices its public diplomacy with new instruments in the region and beyond. It first examines rhetoric’s practical applications. It then analysis some 431 responses to our electronic and physical surveys carried out in 63 countries by the aim of understanding the level of appreciation of Oman's public diplomacy worldwide. After a careful analysis of the results of the survey, it became clear that Oman needs a modern set of tools and strong strategies if she hopes to successfully implement and achieve the goals of its public diplomacy.
UR - https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/803/255
M3 - Article
SN - 1309-6591
VL - 12
SP - 680
EP - 690
JO - Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry
JF - Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry
IS - 3
ER -