TY - JOUR
T1 - Process development and policy implications for large scale deployment of solar-driven electrolysis-based renewable methanol production
AU - Abbas, Abiha
AU - Qadeer, Kinza
AU - Al-Hinai, Amer
AU - Tarar, Muhammad Hazim
AU - Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
AU - Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H.
AU - Abri, Rashid Al
AU - Lee, Moonyong
AU - Dickson, Rofice
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Sultan Qaboos University through the research grant (IG/DVC/SERC/20/01). This research was also supported by Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) through the research grant (STG174-LUMS-CHE) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C1092152) and by Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2014R1A6A1031189).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Using fossil fuels to meet energy demands has led to immense CO2 emissions, resulting in global warming. Efforts to capture CO2 and find renewable energy fuels have been a rapidly evolving field of science. Methanol has been widely investigated as a promising renewable fuel. In this study, three cases of renewable methanol production were evaluated to investigate the possibility of using methanol as a way of mitigating CO2 and simultaneously reducing the dependence on depleting fossil fuel resources. A rigorous techno-economic analysis of the three cases was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and risk involved in the production of renewable methanol by considering the market price of non-renewable methanol as a benchmark. Overall, the results indicate that considering the current market price ($ 560 per Mt) of methanol, renewable methanol production is not cost-effective. Risk analysis results further indicate that the economic risk associated with the investigated designs is between 96-100%. However, a comparison based on environmental performance reveals that the base and integrated designs are 17.5-51.3% better than the non-renewable methanol. In contrast, a 100% renewable design produces zero direct emissions. Hydrogen production price and plant scale are identified as the two crucial parameters for determining the feasibility of the process. Although the production of renewable methanol involves high risk, policy implications are discussed in this regard to pave the way for future improvements.
AB - Using fossil fuels to meet energy demands has led to immense CO2 emissions, resulting in global warming. Efforts to capture CO2 and find renewable energy fuels have been a rapidly evolving field of science. Methanol has been widely investigated as a promising renewable fuel. In this study, three cases of renewable methanol production were evaluated to investigate the possibility of using methanol as a way of mitigating CO2 and simultaneously reducing the dependence on depleting fossil fuel resources. A rigorous techno-economic analysis of the three cases was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and risk involved in the production of renewable methanol by considering the market price of non-renewable methanol as a benchmark. Overall, the results indicate that considering the current market price ($ 560 per Mt) of methanol, renewable methanol production is not cost-effective. Risk analysis results further indicate that the economic risk associated with the investigated designs is between 96-100%. However, a comparison based on environmental performance reveals that the base and integrated designs are 17.5-51.3% better than the non-renewable methanol. In contrast, a 100% renewable design produces zero direct emissions. Hydrogen production price and plant scale are identified as the two crucial parameters for determining the feasibility of the process. Although the production of renewable methanol involves high risk, policy implications are discussed in this regard to pave the way for future improvements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140085724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140085724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d2gc01993k
DO - 10.1039/d2gc01993k
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140085724
SN - 1463-9262
JO - Green Chemistry
JF - Green Chemistry
ER -