Phylogenetic model evaluation.

Lars Sommer Jermiin, Vivek Jayaswal, Faisal Ababneh, John Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Most phylogenetic methods are model-based and depend on Markov models designed to approximate the evolutionary rates between nucleotides or amino acids. When Markov models are selected for analysis of alignments of these characters, it is assumed that they are close approximations of the evolutionary processes that gave rise to the data. A variety of methods have been developed for estimating the fit of Markov models, and some of these methods are now frequently used for the selection of Markov models. In a growing number of cases, however, it appears that the investigators have used the model-selection methods without acknowledging their inherent shortcomings. This chapter reviews the issue of model selection and model evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-364
Number of pages34
JournalMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
Volume452
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Nucleotides
Research Personnel
Amino Acids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Jermiin, L. S., Jayaswal, V., Ababneh, F., & Robinson, J. (2008). Phylogenetic model evaluation. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 452, 331-364.

Phylogenetic model evaluation. / Jermiin, Lars Sommer; Jayaswal, Vivek; Ababneh, Faisal; Robinson, John.

In: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), Vol. 452, 2008, p. 331-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Jermiin, LS, Jayaswal, V, Ababneh, F & Robinson, J 2008, 'Phylogenetic model evaluation.', Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), vol. 452, pp. 331-364.
Jermiin, Lars Sommer ; Jayaswal, Vivek ; Ababneh, Faisal ; Robinson, John. / Phylogenetic model evaluation. In: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). 2008 ; Vol. 452. pp. 331-364.
@article{e2971f43fd30497a80682809131edcf2,
title = "Phylogenetic model evaluation.",
abstract = "Most phylogenetic methods are model-based and depend on Markov models designed to approximate the evolutionary rates between nucleotides or amino acids. When Markov models are selected for analysis of alignments of these characters, it is assumed that they are close approximations of the evolutionary processes that gave rise to the data. A variety of methods have been developed for estimating the fit of Markov models, and some of these methods are now frequently used for the selection of Markov models. In a growing number of cases, however, it appears that the investigators have used the model-selection methods without acknowledging their inherent shortcomings. This chapter reviews the issue of model selection and model evaluation.",
author = "Jermiin, {Lars Sommer} and Vivek Jayaswal and Faisal Ababneh and John Robinson",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "452",
pages = "331--364",
journal = "Methods in Molecular Biology",
issn = "1064-3745",
publisher = "Humana Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phylogenetic model evaluation.

AU - Jermiin, Lars Sommer

AU - Jayaswal, Vivek

AU - Ababneh, Faisal

AU - Robinson, John

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Most phylogenetic methods are model-based and depend on Markov models designed to approximate the evolutionary rates between nucleotides or amino acids. When Markov models are selected for analysis of alignments of these characters, it is assumed that they are close approximations of the evolutionary processes that gave rise to the data. A variety of methods have been developed for estimating the fit of Markov models, and some of these methods are now frequently used for the selection of Markov models. In a growing number of cases, however, it appears that the investigators have used the model-selection methods without acknowledging their inherent shortcomings. This chapter reviews the issue of model selection and model evaluation.

AB - Most phylogenetic methods are model-based and depend on Markov models designed to approximate the evolutionary rates between nucleotides or amino acids. When Markov models are selected for analysis of alignments of these characters, it is assumed that they are close approximations of the evolutionary processes that gave rise to the data. A variety of methods have been developed for estimating the fit of Markov models, and some of these methods are now frequently used for the selection of Markov models. In a growing number of cases, however, it appears that the investigators have used the model-selection methods without acknowledging their inherent shortcomings. This chapter reviews the issue of model selection and model evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46449107012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46449107012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 452

SP - 331

EP - 364

JO - Methods in Molecular Biology

JF - Methods in Molecular Biology

SN - 1064-3745

ER -