Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research

Towards sociological economic analysis

Masudul Alam Choudhury, Mohammad Saleh Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question posed is whether the optimization methods of calculus that are often used in social and scientific analyses offer an appropriate analytical approach to analyze problems that are immersed in systemic complexity and its consequences. This paper refers to the portfolio of such complex problems belonging to social and scientific forces. We refer to such a complex combination by the term 'socio-scientific'. In the study of socio-scientific complexity, dynamic preferences, intricate decisions, and uncertain behavior, endogenous relations and systemic perturbations abound. The arguments presented in this paper establish that the methodological approach of optimization and steady-state equilibrium turns out to be nicety rather than objectivity in the presence of complexity. Complex situations of the socio-scientific universe cause perturbations in the variables; there explaining complexity formed by the social embedding of variables. Indeed, human individuals, institutions and governments, and society at large are complex interrelated entities. Therefore, complex interrelations caused by social embedding remain submerged in social perturbations. However, interactions arising from social embedding (the cause of interrelations between variables) also generate endogenous and complex relations. The contribution of this paper is in the area of endogenous learning in the wellbeing objective criterion function. The interrelationships between the emergent cognitive variables now cause interactive embedding, complexity, and social perturbations. Yet such perturbations are not altogether uncontrollable. They can be and need to be controlled for the purposes of social explanation-hence demanding predictability-even as the complex nature of evolutionary systemic learning proceeds. The controllability problem of extreme perturbations leads us to formalize a mathematical methodology to study controllable perturbations while avoiding extreme forms of perturbations in socio-scientific theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-217
Number of pages15
JournalMind and Society
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Economics
Learning
Calculi
Interpersonal Relations
Research
economics
cause
objectivity
learning
Perturbation
Economic analysis
methodology
interaction
Causes

Keywords

  • Behavioral economics; evolutionary endogenous learning
  • Complexity
  • Epistemology
  • Sociological economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • History

Cite this

Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research : Towards sociological economic analysis. / Choudhury, Masudul Alam; Ahmed, Mohammad Saleh.

In: Mind and Society, Vol. 12, No. 2, 11.2013, p. 203-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choudhury, Masudul Alam ; Ahmed, Mohammad Saleh. / Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research : Towards sociological economic analysis. In: Mind and Society. 2013 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 203-217.
@article{679a2afc06ef458289bb185661105e8f,
title = "Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research: Towards sociological economic analysis",
abstract = "The question posed is whether the optimization methods of calculus that are often used in social and scientific analyses offer an appropriate analytical approach to analyze problems that are immersed in systemic complexity and its consequences. This paper refers to the portfolio of such complex problems belonging to social and scientific forces. We refer to such a complex combination by the term 'socio-scientific'. In the study of socio-scientific complexity, dynamic preferences, intricate decisions, and uncertain behavior, endogenous relations and systemic perturbations abound. The arguments presented in this paper establish that the methodological approach of optimization and steady-state equilibrium turns out to be nicety rather than objectivity in the presence of complexity. Complex situations of the socio-scientific universe cause perturbations in the variables; there explaining complexity formed by the social embedding of variables. Indeed, human individuals, institutions and governments, and society at large are complex interrelated entities. Therefore, complex interrelations caused by social embedding remain submerged in social perturbations. However, interactions arising from social embedding (the cause of interrelations between variables) also generate endogenous and complex relations. The contribution of this paper is in the area of endogenous learning in the wellbeing objective criterion function. The interrelationships between the emergent cognitive variables now cause interactive embedding, complexity, and social perturbations. Yet such perturbations are not altogether uncontrollable. They can be and need to be controlled for the purposes of social explanation-hence demanding predictability-even as the complex nature of evolutionary systemic learning proceeds. The controllability problem of extreme perturbations leads us to formalize a mathematical methodology to study controllable perturbations while avoiding extreme forms of perturbations in socio-scientific theory.",
keywords = "Behavioral economics; evolutionary endogenous learning, Complexity, Epistemology, Sociological economics",
author = "Choudhury, {Masudul Alam} and Ahmed, {Mohammad Saleh}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11299-013-0115-7",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "203--217",
journal = "Mind and Society",
issn = "1593-7879",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perturbation theory in cognitive socio-scientific research

T2 - Towards sociological economic analysis

AU - Choudhury, Masudul Alam

AU - Ahmed, Mohammad Saleh

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - The question posed is whether the optimization methods of calculus that are often used in social and scientific analyses offer an appropriate analytical approach to analyze problems that are immersed in systemic complexity and its consequences. This paper refers to the portfolio of such complex problems belonging to social and scientific forces. We refer to such a complex combination by the term 'socio-scientific'. In the study of socio-scientific complexity, dynamic preferences, intricate decisions, and uncertain behavior, endogenous relations and systemic perturbations abound. The arguments presented in this paper establish that the methodological approach of optimization and steady-state equilibrium turns out to be nicety rather than objectivity in the presence of complexity. Complex situations of the socio-scientific universe cause perturbations in the variables; there explaining complexity formed by the social embedding of variables. Indeed, human individuals, institutions and governments, and society at large are complex interrelated entities. Therefore, complex interrelations caused by social embedding remain submerged in social perturbations. However, interactions arising from social embedding (the cause of interrelations between variables) also generate endogenous and complex relations. The contribution of this paper is in the area of endogenous learning in the wellbeing objective criterion function. The interrelationships between the emergent cognitive variables now cause interactive embedding, complexity, and social perturbations. Yet such perturbations are not altogether uncontrollable. They can be and need to be controlled for the purposes of social explanation-hence demanding predictability-even as the complex nature of evolutionary systemic learning proceeds. The controllability problem of extreme perturbations leads us to formalize a mathematical methodology to study controllable perturbations while avoiding extreme forms of perturbations in socio-scientific theory.

AB - The question posed is whether the optimization methods of calculus that are often used in social and scientific analyses offer an appropriate analytical approach to analyze problems that are immersed in systemic complexity and its consequences. This paper refers to the portfolio of such complex problems belonging to social and scientific forces. We refer to such a complex combination by the term 'socio-scientific'. In the study of socio-scientific complexity, dynamic preferences, intricate decisions, and uncertain behavior, endogenous relations and systemic perturbations abound. The arguments presented in this paper establish that the methodological approach of optimization and steady-state equilibrium turns out to be nicety rather than objectivity in the presence of complexity. Complex situations of the socio-scientific universe cause perturbations in the variables; there explaining complexity formed by the social embedding of variables. Indeed, human individuals, institutions and governments, and society at large are complex interrelated entities. Therefore, complex interrelations caused by social embedding remain submerged in social perturbations. However, interactions arising from social embedding (the cause of interrelations between variables) also generate endogenous and complex relations. The contribution of this paper is in the area of endogenous learning in the wellbeing objective criterion function. The interrelationships between the emergent cognitive variables now cause interactive embedding, complexity, and social perturbations. Yet such perturbations are not altogether uncontrollable. They can be and need to be controlled for the purposes of social explanation-hence demanding predictability-even as the complex nature of evolutionary systemic learning proceeds. The controllability problem of extreme perturbations leads us to formalize a mathematical methodology to study controllable perturbations while avoiding extreme forms of perturbations in socio-scientific theory.

KW - Behavioral economics; evolutionary endogenous learning

KW - Complexity

KW - Epistemology

KW - Sociological economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885864786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885864786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11299-013-0115-7

DO - 10.1007/s11299-013-0115-7

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 203

EP - 217

JO - Mind and Society

JF - Mind and Society

SN - 1593-7879

IS - 2

ER -