Performance measurement methods at academic libraries in Oman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate measurement methods that are in use in various aspects of academic libraries in Oman. Design/methodology/approach: The framework of the research was built to explore various steps of conceptualizing, collecting, analyzing data, and reporting results. Data gathered through in-depth interviews with participants represented different management levels. The analysis process utilized content analysis to shape the relationship between categories that were subjected to formulate knowledge. Findings: Results show that all libraries have used one method or more in evaluating the progress of their services, and the performance of their staff members. These include: surveys; reports; KPIs; statistics; and interviews, in addition to appraisal forms which are used for staff evaluation. Alongside internal evaluation by librarians, an external evaluation by OAC and other international bodies took place in some libraries. Research limitations/implications: The research was challenged by great differences in history, size, and infrastructure between the institutions, which had affected the selection of the research population. Moreover, reports and statistics which existed in some libraries could not provide the necessary data, which forced the researcher to depend on the data gathered from respondents in building the research knowledge. Originality/value: This study aims to fill part of the gap which exists in measurement processes of information services, as it is the first study shedding light on evaluation methods in academic libraries in Oman.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-196
Number of pages14
JournalPerformance Measurement and Metrics
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

measurement method
Oman
performance measurement
evaluation
statistics
staff
process analysis
interview
information service
content analysis
librarian
Academic Libraries
Evaluation
Performance Measurement
infrastructure
methodology
history
management
performance
Values

Keywords

  • Academic libraries
  • Information services
  • Key performance indicators
  • Measurement methods
  • Performance measures
  • Sultanate of Oman

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Performance measurement methods at academic libraries in Oman. / Hijji, Khalfan Zahran Al; Cox, Andrew M.

In: Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 11.2012, p. 183-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da5d4d03a3f94f8a84431528b82aff53,
title = "Performance measurement methods at academic libraries in Oman",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate measurement methods that are in use in various aspects of academic libraries in Oman. Design/methodology/approach: The framework of the research was built to explore various steps of conceptualizing, collecting, analyzing data, and reporting results. Data gathered through in-depth interviews with participants represented different management levels. The analysis process utilized content analysis to shape the relationship between categories that were subjected to formulate knowledge. Findings: Results show that all libraries have used one method or more in evaluating the progress of their services, and the performance of their staff members. These include: surveys; reports; KPIs; statistics; and interviews, in addition to appraisal forms which are used for staff evaluation. Alongside internal evaluation by librarians, an external evaluation by OAC and other international bodies took place in some libraries. Research limitations/implications: The research was challenged by great differences in history, size, and infrastructure between the institutions, which had affected the selection of the research population. Moreover, reports and statistics which existed in some libraries could not provide the necessary data, which forced the researcher to depend on the data gathered from respondents in building the research knowledge. Originality/value: This study aims to fill part of the gap which exists in measurement processes of information services, as it is the first study shedding light on evaluation methods in academic libraries in Oman.",
keywords = "Academic libraries, Information services, Key performance indicators, Measurement methods, Performance measures, Sultanate of Oman",
author = "Hijji, {Khalfan Zahran Al} and Cox, {Andrew M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1108/14678041211284722",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "183--196",
journal = "Performance Measurement and Metrics",
issn = "1467-8047",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance measurement methods at academic libraries in Oman

AU - Hijji, Khalfan Zahran Al

AU - Cox, Andrew M.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate measurement methods that are in use in various aspects of academic libraries in Oman. Design/methodology/approach: The framework of the research was built to explore various steps of conceptualizing, collecting, analyzing data, and reporting results. Data gathered through in-depth interviews with participants represented different management levels. The analysis process utilized content analysis to shape the relationship between categories that were subjected to formulate knowledge. Findings: Results show that all libraries have used one method or more in evaluating the progress of their services, and the performance of their staff members. These include: surveys; reports; KPIs; statistics; and interviews, in addition to appraisal forms which are used for staff evaluation. Alongside internal evaluation by librarians, an external evaluation by OAC and other international bodies took place in some libraries. Research limitations/implications: The research was challenged by great differences in history, size, and infrastructure between the institutions, which had affected the selection of the research population. Moreover, reports and statistics which existed in some libraries could not provide the necessary data, which forced the researcher to depend on the data gathered from respondents in building the research knowledge. Originality/value: This study aims to fill part of the gap which exists in measurement processes of information services, as it is the first study shedding light on evaluation methods in academic libraries in Oman.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate measurement methods that are in use in various aspects of academic libraries in Oman. Design/methodology/approach: The framework of the research was built to explore various steps of conceptualizing, collecting, analyzing data, and reporting results. Data gathered through in-depth interviews with participants represented different management levels. The analysis process utilized content analysis to shape the relationship between categories that were subjected to formulate knowledge. Findings: Results show that all libraries have used one method or more in evaluating the progress of their services, and the performance of their staff members. These include: surveys; reports; KPIs; statistics; and interviews, in addition to appraisal forms which are used for staff evaluation. Alongside internal evaluation by librarians, an external evaluation by OAC and other international bodies took place in some libraries. Research limitations/implications: The research was challenged by great differences in history, size, and infrastructure between the institutions, which had affected the selection of the research population. Moreover, reports and statistics which existed in some libraries could not provide the necessary data, which forced the researcher to depend on the data gathered from respondents in building the research knowledge. Originality/value: This study aims to fill part of the gap which exists in measurement processes of information services, as it is the first study shedding light on evaluation methods in academic libraries in Oman.

KW - Academic libraries

KW - Information services

KW - Key performance indicators

KW - Measurement methods

KW - Performance measures

KW - Sultanate of Oman

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870164629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870164629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14678041211284722

DO - 10.1108/14678041211284722

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 183

EP - 196

JO - Performance Measurement and Metrics

JF - Performance Measurement and Metrics

SN - 1467-8047

IS - 3

ER -