Performance analysis and measurement of reconfigurable manufacturing systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

purpose-The purpose of this paper is to propose a new performance analysis and measurement regarding reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) taken into consideration new circumstances which include changes in the market demand, changes in a product design, and/or introduction of a new product. As the reconfiguration process is applied to a manufacturing system to improve the system's performance due to new circumstances, the RMS process has potential quantitative and qualitative measures.

Design/methodology/approach-The manufacturing system has a great impact on the performance measurement and the selection of the objectives to measure the performance is very important. These objectives include the critical requirements for a RMS and they are as follows: product cost, manufacturing response, system productivity, people behavior, inventory, and quality of the finished products. Because each criterion measure in a RMS is a potential source of evaluation, it should have a relative weight with respect to the other measures. First, each criterion will be measured individually. Second, these measures need to be evaluated through an aggregate quantitative metric because there is a lack of analytical techniques to analyze and evaluate both qualitative and quantitative measures.

Findings-Performance evaluation of a RMS from one circumstance to another is highly desired by using the new quantitative metric regarding updating (upgrading) the system for the next period based on the previous one. The results show that the applicable of using this new technique in evaluating the RMS. The results also support the new quantitative metric.

Originality/value-The suggestion of a new aggregate performance measurement metric including the all potential objectives is highly considered. This paper provides an insight into each objective individually to measure it. It is also used from 0 to 1 as range of measure to evaluate the potential and aggregate metrics toward next reconfiguration with respect to the existing one.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-957
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2014

Fingerprint

Reconfigurable manufacturing system
Performance measurement
Performance analysis
Product design
Productivity
Reconfiguration
Manufacturing systems
Costs
Inventory behavior
Analytical techniques
Relative weight
Design methodology
Evaluation
Performance evaluation
Product cost
New products
Market demand
Upgrading
Manufacturing

Keywords

  • Flexibility
  • Manufacturing flexibility
  • Manufacturing systems
  • Performance measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Performance analysis and measurement of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. / Garbie, Ibrahim.

In: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.08.2014, p. 934-957.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc25d5a2f6bf4d49a35376799ac0e8b4,
title = "Performance analysis and measurement of reconfigurable manufacturing systems",
abstract = "purpose-The purpose of this paper is to propose a new performance analysis and measurement regarding reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) taken into consideration new circumstances which include changes in the market demand, changes in a product design, and/or introduction of a new product. As the reconfiguration process is applied to a manufacturing system to improve the system's performance due to new circumstances, the RMS process has potential quantitative and qualitative measures.Design/methodology/approach-The manufacturing system has a great impact on the performance measurement and the selection of the objectives to measure the performance is very important. These objectives include the critical requirements for a RMS and they are as follows: product cost, manufacturing response, system productivity, people behavior, inventory, and quality of the finished products. Because each criterion measure in a RMS is a potential source of evaluation, it should have a relative weight with respect to the other measures. First, each criterion will be measured individually. Second, these measures need to be evaluated through an aggregate quantitative metric because there is a lack of analytical techniques to analyze and evaluate both qualitative and quantitative measures.Findings-Performance evaluation of a RMS from one circumstance to another is highly desired by using the new quantitative metric regarding updating (upgrading) the system for the next period based on the previous one. The results show that the applicable of using this new technique in evaluating the RMS. The results also support the new quantitative metric.Originality/value-The suggestion of a new aggregate performance measurement metric including the all potential objectives is highly considered. This paper provides an insight into each objective individually to measure it. It is also used from 0 to 1 as range of measure to evaluate the potential and aggregate metrics toward next reconfiguration with respect to the existing one.",
keywords = "Flexibility, Manufacturing flexibility, Manufacturing systems, Performance measurement",
author = "Ibrahim Garbie",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JMTM-07-2011-0070",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "934--957",
journal = "Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management",
issn = "1741-038X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance analysis and measurement of reconfigurable manufacturing systems

AU - Garbie, Ibrahim

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - purpose-The purpose of this paper is to propose a new performance analysis and measurement regarding reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) taken into consideration new circumstances which include changes in the market demand, changes in a product design, and/or introduction of a new product. As the reconfiguration process is applied to a manufacturing system to improve the system's performance due to new circumstances, the RMS process has potential quantitative and qualitative measures.Design/methodology/approach-The manufacturing system has a great impact on the performance measurement and the selection of the objectives to measure the performance is very important. These objectives include the critical requirements for a RMS and they are as follows: product cost, manufacturing response, system productivity, people behavior, inventory, and quality of the finished products. Because each criterion measure in a RMS is a potential source of evaluation, it should have a relative weight with respect to the other measures. First, each criterion will be measured individually. Second, these measures need to be evaluated through an aggregate quantitative metric because there is a lack of analytical techniques to analyze and evaluate both qualitative and quantitative measures.Findings-Performance evaluation of a RMS from one circumstance to another is highly desired by using the new quantitative metric regarding updating (upgrading) the system for the next period based on the previous one. The results show that the applicable of using this new technique in evaluating the RMS. The results also support the new quantitative metric.Originality/value-The suggestion of a new aggregate performance measurement metric including the all potential objectives is highly considered. This paper provides an insight into each objective individually to measure it. It is also used from 0 to 1 as range of measure to evaluate the potential and aggregate metrics toward next reconfiguration with respect to the existing one.

AB - purpose-The purpose of this paper is to propose a new performance analysis and measurement regarding reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) taken into consideration new circumstances which include changes in the market demand, changes in a product design, and/or introduction of a new product. As the reconfiguration process is applied to a manufacturing system to improve the system's performance due to new circumstances, the RMS process has potential quantitative and qualitative measures.Design/methodology/approach-The manufacturing system has a great impact on the performance measurement and the selection of the objectives to measure the performance is very important. These objectives include the critical requirements for a RMS and they are as follows: product cost, manufacturing response, system productivity, people behavior, inventory, and quality of the finished products. Because each criterion measure in a RMS is a potential source of evaluation, it should have a relative weight with respect to the other measures. First, each criterion will be measured individually. Second, these measures need to be evaluated through an aggregate quantitative metric because there is a lack of analytical techniques to analyze and evaluate both qualitative and quantitative measures.Findings-Performance evaluation of a RMS from one circumstance to another is highly desired by using the new quantitative metric regarding updating (upgrading) the system for the next period based on the previous one. The results show that the applicable of using this new technique in evaluating the RMS. The results also support the new quantitative metric.Originality/value-The suggestion of a new aggregate performance measurement metric including the all potential objectives is highly considered. This paper provides an insight into each objective individually to measure it. It is also used from 0 to 1 as range of measure to evaluate the potential and aggregate metrics toward next reconfiguration with respect to the existing one.

KW - Flexibility

KW - Manufacturing flexibility

KW - Manufacturing systems

KW - Performance measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908398566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908398566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JMTM-07-2011-0070

DO - 10.1108/JMTM-07-2011-0070

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908398566

VL - 25

SP - 934

EP - 957

JO - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

JF - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

SN - 1741-038X

IS - 7

ER -