Patient safety culture assessment in Oman

Ahmed Al-Mandhari, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Moosa Al-Kindi, Jihane Tawilah, Atsu S S Dorvlo, Samir Al-Adawi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To illustrate the patient safety culture in Oman as gleaned via 12 indices of patient safety culture derived from the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) and to compare the average positive response rates in patient safety culture between Oman and the USA, Taiwan, and Lebanon. Methods: This was a cross-sectional research study employed to gauge the performance of HSPSC safety indices among health workers representing five secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the northern region of Oman. The participants (n=398) represented different professional designations of hospital staff. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Results: The overall average positive response rate for the 12 patient safety culture dimensions of the HSPSC survey in Oman was 58%. The indices from HSPSC that were endorsed the highest included 'organizational learning and continuous improvement' while conversely, 'non-punitive response to errors' was ranked the least. There were no significant differences in average positive response rates between Oman and the United States (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666), Taiwan (58% vs. 64%; p=0.386), and Lebanon (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666). Conclusion: This study provides the first empirical study on patient safety culture in Oman which is similar to those rates reported elsewhere. It highlights the specific strengths and weaknesses which may stem from the specific milieu prevailing in Oman.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-270
Number of pages7
JournalOman Medical Journal
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Oman
Safety Management
Patient Safety
Lebanon
Taiwan
Secondary Care
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Learning
Safety

Keywords

  • Health care surveys
  • Hospital administration
  • Oman
  • Organizational culture
  • Patient safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient safety culture assessment in Oman. / Al-Mandhari, Ahmed; Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim; Al-Kindi, Moosa; Tawilah, Jihane; Dorvlo, Atsu S S; Al-Adawi, Samir.

In: Oman Medical Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2014, p. 264-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Mandhari, Ahmed ; Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim ; Al-Kindi, Moosa ; Tawilah, Jihane ; Dorvlo, Atsu S S ; Al-Adawi, Samir. / Patient safety culture assessment in Oman. In: Oman Medical Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 264-270.
@article{74589ff6f6f24e42b7a78850bd3c91af,
title = "Patient safety culture assessment in Oman",
abstract = "Objective: To illustrate the patient safety culture in Oman as gleaned via 12 indices of patient safety culture derived from the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) and to compare the average positive response rates in patient safety culture between Oman and the USA, Taiwan, and Lebanon. Methods: This was a cross-sectional research study employed to gauge the performance of HSPSC safety indices among health workers representing five secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the northern region of Oman. The participants (n=398) represented different professional designations of hospital staff. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Results: The overall average positive response rate for the 12 patient safety culture dimensions of the HSPSC survey in Oman was 58{\%}. The indices from HSPSC that were endorsed the highest included 'organizational learning and continuous improvement' while conversely, 'non-punitive response to errors' was ranked the least. There were no significant differences in average positive response rates between Oman and the United States (58{\%} vs. 61{\%}; p=0.666), Taiwan (58{\%} vs. 64{\%}; p=0.386), and Lebanon (58{\%} vs. 61{\%}; p=0.666). Conclusion: This study provides the first empirical study on patient safety culture in Oman which is similar to those rates reported elsewhere. It highlights the specific strengths and weaknesses which may stem from the specific milieu prevailing in Oman.",
keywords = "Health care surveys, Hospital administration, Oman, Organizational culture, Patient safety",
author = "Ahmed Al-Mandhari and Ibrahim Al-Zakwani and Moosa Al-Kindi and Jihane Tawilah and Dorvlo, {Atsu S S} and Samir Al-Adawi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5001/omj.2014.70",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "264--270",
journal = "Oman Medical Journal",
issn = "1999-768X",
publisher = "Oman Medical Specialty Board",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety culture assessment in Oman

AU - Al-Mandhari, Ahmed

AU - Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim

AU - Al-Kindi, Moosa

AU - Tawilah, Jihane

AU - Dorvlo, Atsu S S

AU - Al-Adawi, Samir

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To illustrate the patient safety culture in Oman as gleaned via 12 indices of patient safety culture derived from the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) and to compare the average positive response rates in patient safety culture between Oman and the USA, Taiwan, and Lebanon. Methods: This was a cross-sectional research study employed to gauge the performance of HSPSC safety indices among health workers representing five secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the northern region of Oman. The participants (n=398) represented different professional designations of hospital staff. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Results: The overall average positive response rate for the 12 patient safety culture dimensions of the HSPSC survey in Oman was 58%. The indices from HSPSC that were endorsed the highest included 'organizational learning and continuous improvement' while conversely, 'non-punitive response to errors' was ranked the least. There were no significant differences in average positive response rates between Oman and the United States (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666), Taiwan (58% vs. 64%; p=0.386), and Lebanon (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666). Conclusion: This study provides the first empirical study on patient safety culture in Oman which is similar to those rates reported elsewhere. It highlights the specific strengths and weaknesses which may stem from the specific milieu prevailing in Oman.

AB - Objective: To illustrate the patient safety culture in Oman as gleaned via 12 indices of patient safety culture derived from the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) and to compare the average positive response rates in patient safety culture between Oman and the USA, Taiwan, and Lebanon. Methods: This was a cross-sectional research study employed to gauge the performance of HSPSC safety indices among health workers representing five secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the northern region of Oman. The participants (n=398) represented different professional designations of hospital staff. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Results: The overall average positive response rate for the 12 patient safety culture dimensions of the HSPSC survey in Oman was 58%. The indices from HSPSC that were endorsed the highest included 'organizational learning and continuous improvement' while conversely, 'non-punitive response to errors' was ranked the least. There were no significant differences in average positive response rates between Oman and the United States (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666), Taiwan (58% vs. 64%; p=0.386), and Lebanon (58% vs. 61%; p=0.666). Conclusion: This study provides the first empirical study on patient safety culture in Oman which is similar to those rates reported elsewhere. It highlights the specific strengths and weaknesses which may stem from the specific milieu prevailing in Oman.

KW - Health care surveys

KW - Hospital administration

KW - Oman

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905465535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905465535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5001/omj.2014.70

DO - 10.5001/omj.2014.70

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 264

EP - 270

JO - Oman Medical Journal

JF - Oman Medical Journal

SN - 1999-768X

IS - 4

ER -