Optimization of the shape of a triangular unlined canal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Within the scope of the adopted model, the solution of the indicated optimization problems for triangular canals is unique. 2. The best angle of the side slopes in problems 1-3 is respectively equal to 38, 42, and 42.36°. 3. In a practically rather large interval of values of α the corresponding triangular canals are close in seepage losses to an optimal canal, and moreover the canals optimal in the sense of statements 1-3 are close in losses to each other. 4. On departing from the "fork" of optimal canals (for sufficiently large or small α) the corresponding canals differ in losses from optimal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-43
Number of pages3
JournalHydrotechnical Construction
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1985

Fingerprint

Canals
canal
Seepage
seepage
loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Energy(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Optimization of the shape of a triangular unlined canal. / Kasiraov, A. R.

In: Hydrotechnical Construction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.1985, p. 41-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{899d0f35997f45a4b067f42dc935291a,
title = "Optimization of the shape of a triangular unlined canal",
abstract = "1. Within the scope of the adopted model, the solution of the indicated optimization problems for triangular canals is unique. 2. The best angle of the side slopes in problems 1-3 is respectively equal to 38, 42, and 42.36°. 3. In a practically rather large interval of values of α the corresponding triangular canals are close in seepage losses to an optimal canal, and moreover the canals optimal in the sense of statements 1-3 are close in losses to each other. 4. On departing from the {"}fork{"} of optimal canals (for sufficiently large or small α) the corresponding canals differ in losses from optimal.",
author = "Kasiraov, {A. R.}",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01428940",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "41--43",
journal = "Power Technology and Engineering",
issn = "1570-145X",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimization of the shape of a triangular unlined canal

AU - Kasiraov, A. R.

PY - 1985/1

Y1 - 1985/1

N2 - 1. Within the scope of the adopted model, the solution of the indicated optimization problems for triangular canals is unique. 2. The best angle of the side slopes in problems 1-3 is respectively equal to 38, 42, and 42.36°. 3. In a practically rather large interval of values of α the corresponding triangular canals are close in seepage losses to an optimal canal, and moreover the canals optimal in the sense of statements 1-3 are close in losses to each other. 4. On departing from the "fork" of optimal canals (for sufficiently large or small α) the corresponding canals differ in losses from optimal.

AB - 1. Within the scope of the adopted model, the solution of the indicated optimization problems for triangular canals is unique. 2. The best angle of the side slopes in problems 1-3 is respectively equal to 38, 42, and 42.36°. 3. In a practically rather large interval of values of α the corresponding triangular canals are close in seepage losses to an optimal canal, and moreover the canals optimal in the sense of statements 1-3 are close in losses to each other. 4. On departing from the "fork" of optimal canals (for sufficiently large or small α) the corresponding canals differ in losses from optimal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021974425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021974425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01428940

DO - 10.1007/BF01428940

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0021974425

VL - 19

SP - 41

EP - 43

JO - Power Technology and Engineering

JF - Power Technology and Engineering

SN - 1570-145X

IS - 1

ER -