Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients

Comparison with thermodilution method

Arunodaya R. Gujjar, K. Muralidhar, Sanjay Banakal, Ratan Gupta, Talakad N. Sathyaprabha, P. S. Jairaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) cardiac output (CO) is being explored increasingly as a non-invasive alternative to the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). This study compared TEB-CO measured using a new instrument - NICOMON (Larsen & Toubro Ltd. India) with thermodilution (Td) CO in post-cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Postoperative cardiac surgical patients requiring a PAC for their management were studied. TEB-CO was measured by passing a 4 mA RMS alternating current across the chest and measuring the analog bioimpedence across the thorax. Kubicek equation was used to estimate TEB-CO. Td-CO was measured using a PAC. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare paired data. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven pairs of CO measurements were made by the two methods among 35 patients. Mean TEB-CO was 5.15 ± 1.27 l/min and mean Td-CO was 5.22 ± 1.28 l/min. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for these measurements was 0.856 (P <0.01), with bias -0.0651 l and precision: ±1.37 l/min. The percentage error of measurement of this precision was 26.44%. Cardiac index also correlated among the two methods (r = 0.789; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output compares favorably with thermodilution method among post-cardiac surgery patients. Further studies are indicated with this instrument to validate its efficacy in various clinical situations and utility in monitoring hemodynamic interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-180
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Thermodilution
Cardiac Output
Thoracic Surgery
Thorax
Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
India
Hemodynamics

Keywords

  • Bioimpedance cardiac output
  • Cardiac output
  • Noninvasive cardiac output
  • Thoracic electrical bioimpedance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients : Comparison with thermodilution method. / Gujjar, Arunodaya R.; Muralidhar, K.; Banakal, Sanjay; Gupta, Ratan; Sathyaprabha, Talakad N.; Jairaj, P. S.

In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Vol. 22, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 175-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gujjar, Arunodaya R. ; Muralidhar, K. ; Banakal, Sanjay ; Gupta, Ratan ; Sathyaprabha, Talakad N. ; Jairaj, P. S. / Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients : Comparison with thermodilution method. In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 175-180.
@article{e3dd2df367d149fba63b2ef59fa311ae,
title = "Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: Comparison with thermodilution method",
abstract = "Objective: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) cardiac output (CO) is being explored increasingly as a non-invasive alternative to the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). This study compared TEB-CO measured using a new instrument - NICOMON (Larsen & Toubro Ltd. India) with thermodilution (Td) CO in post-cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Postoperative cardiac surgical patients requiring a PAC for their management were studied. TEB-CO was measured by passing a 4 mA RMS alternating current across the chest and measuring the analog bioimpedence across the thorax. Kubicek equation was used to estimate TEB-CO. Td-CO was measured using a PAC. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare paired data. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven pairs of CO measurements were made by the two methods among 35 patients. Mean TEB-CO was 5.15 ± 1.27 l/min and mean Td-CO was 5.22 ± 1.28 l/min. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for these measurements was 0.856 (P <0.01), with bias -0.0651 l and precision: ±1.37 l/min. The percentage error of measurement of this precision was 26.44{\%}. Cardiac index also correlated among the two methods (r = 0.789; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output compares favorably with thermodilution method among post-cardiac surgery patients. Further studies are indicated with this instrument to validate its efficacy in various clinical situations and utility in monitoring hemodynamic interventions.",
keywords = "Bioimpedance cardiac output, Cardiac output, Noninvasive cardiac output, Thoracic electrical bioimpedance",
author = "Gujjar, {Arunodaya R.} and K. Muralidhar and Sanjay Banakal and Ratan Gupta and Sathyaprabha, {Talakad N.} and Jairaj, {P. S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10877-008-9119-y",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "175--180",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing",
issn = "1387-1307",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients

T2 - Comparison with thermodilution method

AU - Gujjar, Arunodaya R.

AU - Muralidhar, K.

AU - Banakal, Sanjay

AU - Gupta, Ratan

AU - Sathyaprabha, Talakad N.

AU - Jairaj, P. S.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Objective: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) cardiac output (CO) is being explored increasingly as a non-invasive alternative to the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). This study compared TEB-CO measured using a new instrument - NICOMON (Larsen & Toubro Ltd. India) with thermodilution (Td) CO in post-cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Postoperative cardiac surgical patients requiring a PAC for their management were studied. TEB-CO was measured by passing a 4 mA RMS alternating current across the chest and measuring the analog bioimpedence across the thorax. Kubicek equation was used to estimate TEB-CO. Td-CO was measured using a PAC. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare paired data. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven pairs of CO measurements were made by the two methods among 35 patients. Mean TEB-CO was 5.15 ± 1.27 l/min and mean Td-CO was 5.22 ± 1.28 l/min. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for these measurements was 0.856 (P <0.01), with bias -0.0651 l and precision: ±1.37 l/min. The percentage error of measurement of this precision was 26.44%. Cardiac index also correlated among the two methods (r = 0.789; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output compares favorably with thermodilution method among post-cardiac surgery patients. Further studies are indicated with this instrument to validate its efficacy in various clinical situations and utility in monitoring hemodynamic interventions.

AB - Objective: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) cardiac output (CO) is being explored increasingly as a non-invasive alternative to the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). This study compared TEB-CO measured using a new instrument - NICOMON (Larsen & Toubro Ltd. India) with thermodilution (Td) CO in post-cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Postoperative cardiac surgical patients requiring a PAC for their management were studied. TEB-CO was measured by passing a 4 mA RMS alternating current across the chest and measuring the analog bioimpedence across the thorax. Kubicek equation was used to estimate TEB-CO. Td-CO was measured using a PAC. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare paired data. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven pairs of CO measurements were made by the two methods among 35 patients. Mean TEB-CO was 5.15 ± 1.27 l/min and mean Td-CO was 5.22 ± 1.28 l/min. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for these measurements was 0.856 (P <0.01), with bias -0.0651 l and precision: ±1.37 l/min. The percentage error of measurement of this precision was 26.44%. Cardiac index also correlated among the two methods (r = 0.789; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output compares favorably with thermodilution method among post-cardiac surgery patients. Further studies are indicated with this instrument to validate its efficacy in various clinical situations and utility in monitoring hemodynamic interventions.

KW - Bioimpedance cardiac output

KW - Cardiac output

KW - Noninvasive cardiac output

KW - Thoracic electrical bioimpedance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45849152599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45849152599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10877-008-9119-y

DO - 10.1007/s10877-008-9119-y

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 175

EP - 180

JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

SN - 1387-1307

IS - 3

ER -