Nipping an education myth in the bud: Poh's brain activity during lectures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The debate around the value of lectures is raging strongly, and new empirical data arguing against the value of lectures comes from a chart showing student brain activity during lectures. The evidence from the chart, however, suffers from crucial problems. These include a small and unspecific sample, mislabeling of the student activities, and a misinterpretation of the type of measurement. This chart has appeared on the Internet, in education conferences and journals, and recently at a medical education conference. For medical education to be taken seriously, it is crucial that researchers apply the same standards that they would to clinical research. As a result, this chart should be avoided in the debate on the value of lectures before it has a chance to follow a pattern in medical education set by other myths.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)732-735
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Medical Education
myth
brain
Education
Brain
Students
education
Values
Internet
Research Personnel
student
Research
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Nipping an education myth in the bud : Poh's brain activity during lectures. / Masters, Ken.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2014, p. 732-735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{374875c27a6d494e8cb27b401ee471af,
title = "Nipping an education myth in the bud: Poh's brain activity during lectures",
abstract = "The debate around the value of lectures is raging strongly, and new empirical data arguing against the value of lectures comes from a chart showing student brain activity during lectures. The evidence from the chart, however, suffers from crucial problems. These include a small and unspecific sample, mislabeling of the student activities, and a misinterpretation of the type of measurement. This chart has appeared on the Internet, in education conferences and journals, and recently at a medical education conference. For medical education to be taken seriously, it is crucial that researchers apply the same standards that they would to clinical research. As a result, this chart should be avoided in the debate on the value of lectures before it has a chance to follow a pattern in medical education set by other myths.",
author = "Ken Masters",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2014.916785",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "732--735",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nipping an education myth in the bud

T2 - Poh's brain activity during lectures

AU - Masters, Ken

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The debate around the value of lectures is raging strongly, and new empirical data arguing against the value of lectures comes from a chart showing student brain activity during lectures. The evidence from the chart, however, suffers from crucial problems. These include a small and unspecific sample, mislabeling of the student activities, and a misinterpretation of the type of measurement. This chart has appeared on the Internet, in education conferences and journals, and recently at a medical education conference. For medical education to be taken seriously, it is crucial that researchers apply the same standards that they would to clinical research. As a result, this chart should be avoided in the debate on the value of lectures before it has a chance to follow a pattern in medical education set by other myths.

AB - The debate around the value of lectures is raging strongly, and new empirical data arguing against the value of lectures comes from a chart showing student brain activity during lectures. The evidence from the chart, however, suffers from crucial problems. These include a small and unspecific sample, mislabeling of the student activities, and a misinterpretation of the type of measurement. This chart has appeared on the Internet, in education conferences and journals, and recently at a medical education conference. For medical education to be taken seriously, it is crucial that researchers apply the same standards that they would to clinical research. As a result, this chart should be avoided in the debate on the value of lectures before it has a chance to follow a pattern in medical education set by other myths.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903949941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903949941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.916785

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.916785

M3 - Article

C2 - 24965519

AN - SCOPUS:84903949941

VL - 36

SP - 732

EP - 735

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 8

ER -