More-stable owner-contractor relationships

P. Dozzi, F. Hartman, N. Tidsbury, R. Ashrafi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents an updated and enhanced version of a study conducted by the task force of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) on 'More-Stable Contractor Relationships.' The purpose of the study was to explore the current contracting philosophies, strategies, methods of execution, tendering processes, and techniques. The purpose of the study was also to identify the problem areas and determinants of success in the execution of projects, and to share these findings with the industry for further improvement. We have found that the industry is somewhat complacent and appears reluctant to embrace change. There is a preoccupation with contract award on the basis of lowest lump-sum bid although most recognize that this often results in a higher end price for the product. There is a need for improvement in the areas of life-cycle costing, contracting process, risk management, teamwork, trust, and cooperation, as well as communication and the use of quality management principles. There are ample opportunities to be more progressive. The survey and subsequent evaluation concluded that any initiatives to formulate more stable contractor relationships must come from construction owners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-35
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume122
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Contractors
Quality management
Risk management
Life cycle
Industry
Communication
Contracting
Owners
Team work
Strategy method
Life cycle costing
Evaluation
Bid
Tendering
Task force

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

More-stable owner-contractor relationships. / Dozzi, P.; Hartman, F.; Tidsbury, N.; Ashrafi, R.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 122, No. 1, 1996, p. 30-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dozzi, P. ; Hartman, F. ; Tidsbury, N. ; Ashrafi, R. / More-stable owner-contractor relationships. In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1996 ; Vol. 122, No. 1. pp. 30-35.
@article{3f6da839f194494fa705646f26904714,
title = "More-stable owner-contractor relationships",
abstract = "This paper presents an updated and enhanced version of a study conducted by the task force of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) on 'More-Stable Contractor Relationships.' The purpose of the study was to explore the current contracting philosophies, strategies, methods of execution, tendering processes, and techniques. The purpose of the study was also to identify the problem areas and determinants of success in the execution of projects, and to share these findings with the industry for further improvement. We have found that the industry is somewhat complacent and appears reluctant to embrace change. There is a preoccupation with contract award on the basis of lowest lump-sum bid although most recognize that this often results in a higher end price for the product. There is a need for improvement in the areas of life-cycle costing, contracting process, risk management, teamwork, trust, and cooperation, as well as communication and the use of quality management principles. There are ample opportunities to be more progressive. The survey and subsequent evaluation concluded that any initiatives to formulate more stable contractor relationships must come from construction owners.",
author = "P. Dozzi and F. Hartman and N. Tidsbury and R. Ashrafi",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(30)",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "30--35",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More-stable owner-contractor relationships

AU - Dozzi, P.

AU - Hartman, F.

AU - Tidsbury, N.

AU - Ashrafi, R.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - This paper presents an updated and enhanced version of a study conducted by the task force of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) on 'More-Stable Contractor Relationships.' The purpose of the study was to explore the current contracting philosophies, strategies, methods of execution, tendering processes, and techniques. The purpose of the study was also to identify the problem areas and determinants of success in the execution of projects, and to share these findings with the industry for further improvement. We have found that the industry is somewhat complacent and appears reluctant to embrace change. There is a preoccupation with contract award on the basis of lowest lump-sum bid although most recognize that this often results in a higher end price for the product. There is a need for improvement in the areas of life-cycle costing, contracting process, risk management, teamwork, trust, and cooperation, as well as communication and the use of quality management principles. There are ample opportunities to be more progressive. The survey and subsequent evaluation concluded that any initiatives to formulate more stable contractor relationships must come from construction owners.

AB - This paper presents an updated and enhanced version of a study conducted by the task force of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) on 'More-Stable Contractor Relationships.' The purpose of the study was to explore the current contracting philosophies, strategies, methods of execution, tendering processes, and techniques. The purpose of the study was also to identify the problem areas and determinants of success in the execution of projects, and to share these findings with the industry for further improvement. We have found that the industry is somewhat complacent and appears reluctant to embrace change. There is a preoccupation with contract award on the basis of lowest lump-sum bid although most recognize that this often results in a higher end price for the product. There is a need for improvement in the areas of life-cycle costing, contracting process, risk management, teamwork, trust, and cooperation, as well as communication and the use of quality management principles. There are ample opportunities to be more progressive. The survey and subsequent evaluation concluded that any initiatives to formulate more stable contractor relationships must come from construction owners.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029773659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029773659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(30)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(30)

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 30

EP - 35

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 1

ER -